Celtic board still no wanting to spend money then ๐ฅฐ
Hearts splashing ๐ธ left, right and centre
14 players out of contract at Vartic, still no manager
Massive rebuild for Vartic
Hearts have 3 in the door, with another 5-8 lined up
Just took Calvin Miller from them โ๏ธ
You cheating huns and hun lovers know all about cheating. You have the sectarian SFA and the freemason referee's all helping you out. SCOTTISH FOOTBALL CORRUPT TO THE CORE ALL TO HELP THE CHEATING HUNS ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ
Regarding the SFA's KMI panel: I have had a lot of people claim my numbers are wrong. The full CSV is available for download below with a record of all KMI panel verdicts this season. Every incident can be verified against the SFA website.๐
Scottish FA KMI Panel, 2025-26 season summary
I've scraped every KMI panel report the Scottish FA has published for 2025-26, all 39 PDFs, 354 individual incidents from August through May, and tallied which clubs the panel ruled for and against. Sick of seeing stats that are basically made up. These are the facts.
This is based entirely on the SFA's own published verdicts and is entirely in the public domain. Checks welcome
Reading the table:
Rangers are the only one of the three with a positive net-correct balance. Upheld on-field calls in their matches went their way more often than against.
Celtic sit at -8. Most upheld decisions in their games went against them.
Hearts are essentially neutral.
On errors specifically (where the panel ruled the ref got it wrong), all three clubs net BENEFIT โ Rangers +4, Celtic +2, Hearts +1.
Season-wide: 92.7% of on-field decisions ruled correct by the panel, 7.3% ruled errors.
Definitions:
"Correct FOR" = on-field call went the club's way AND panel agreed
"Correct AGAINST" = call went against the club AND panel agreed
"Errors FOR" = panel found a wrongful call that hurt the club
"Errors AGAINST" = panel found a wrongful call that helped the club
Source: https://t.co/eqWjHmuKVt