Phil Crisp

Lack of words for the insanity unfolding around us

[Marhelm @MarhelmData]

Gibson - The VLCC orderbook has gone from 5% of the fleet in 2024 to 35% today

[🏴‍☠️ @calvinfroedge]

I actually can't wait until oil specs are at an all-time low and the strait is still closed

A market with nobody long is a market that can squeeze like crazy

[Phil Crisp @PhilCrisp2]

@TheDavidWeck From Feldenkreis to modern science - none of the movement pioneers was able to transfer his insights into real performance gains - until David Weck gave us the tools! Ignore him at your own detriment!

[Metabolic Uncle @MetabolicUncle]

COFFEE RECHARGES YOUR MITOCHONDRIA: THE BIOCHEMISTRY BEHIND A DAILY METABOLIC BOOST

Coffee triggers changes inside your cells that go far beyond a temporary jolt of alertness. The popular narrative that caffeine wears down your adrenal glands relies on a misunderstanding of stress signals. Your glands adapt to regular intake, and the real story happens deep inside the mitochondria.

Adenosine molecules build up as your cells work, acting like a brake on energy metabolism. Caffeine fits into the same receptors without activating them, effectively removing that brake. Cyclic AMP levels then rise, protein kinases switch on, and your body begins mobilizing glucose and fatty acids for fuel.

Regular coffee consumption improves insulin sensitivity and helps the liver restock glycogen more efficiently. Habitual drinkers clear glucose better, indicating an adaptive upgrade. Long-term data show the opposite of depletion.

Caffeine also sensitizes calcium channels on internal cell membranes. At normal dietary doses it does not force a flood of calcium. It lowers the threshold for a small, self-limiting pulse to enter the mitochondria, where it activates rate-limiting enzymes in the Krebs cycle. NADH and FADH2 production accelerates, feeding the electron transport chain more effectively.

A protein called p27 gets shuttled directly into the mitochondria when caffeine is present. Once inside, p27 enhances respiration and ATP synthesis. This is a genuine upgrade to the energy-producing machinery.

The hormonal reshuffling further explains coffee's metabolic benefits. By blocking adenosine receptors, caffeine improves dopamine signaling, which lowers prolactin. Prolactin acts as a stress signal that suppresses thyroid output, so reducing it removes a brake on metabolic rate and energy production.

Coffee also makes your cells more sensitive to thyroid hormones. The sustained cAMP activity preserves a kinase that phosphorylates nuclear coactivators and the thyroid receptor itself. That increases the receptor's affinity for active T3 and ramps up local conversion of T4 to T3. Large population studies show coffee drinkers tend to have lower TSH while maintaining stable thyroid hormone levels, pointing to improved receptor sensitivity rather than glandular suppression.

A fascinating bonus involves oxygen delivery. Shifting metabolism toward glucose oxidation generates more carbon dioxide. The extra CO2 lowers local pH in tissues, forcing hemoglobin to release more oxygen. Your cells get more oxygen per breath.

The historical fear around coffee stemmed from confounded data. Heavy coffee drinkers were also more likely to smoke, drink alcohol, and eat processed foods rich in unstable seed oils. Those polyunsaturated fats damage mitochondrial cardiolipin and drive insulin resistance. Once researchers controlled for smoking, the link between coffee and mortality vanished.

Long-term studies now show robust protection. Each additional cup daily associates with a reduction in type 2 diabetes risk, a lower chance of Parkinson's, a sharp drop in late-life dementia risk, and a significant decrease in liver cirrhosis.

Coffee's benefits depend on the metabolic environment you provide. Without adequate fuel and mineral support, the body can respond to the metabolic acceleration with a temporary stress reaction. Drinking coffee on an empty stomach can drop blood glucose quickly, prompting a cortisol release. That response is a predictable sign of a fuel deficit, easily prevented by eating alongside your coffee.

The solution involves simple nutritional steps. Pairing coffee with easily digestible carbohydrates, replenishing the minerals your cells consume at a faster rate, and choosing clean, uncontaminated beans transforms the experience.

The detailed practical application of these strategies appears in Part 2, and a bulleted action cheat sheet in Part 3.

[Satya Nadella @satyanadella]

https://t.co/vLmiBKTtX3

[🏴‍☠️ @calvinfroedge]

And you're short Braskem

[Metabolic Uncle @MetabolicUncle]

HOW FEAR OF DAIRY CALCIFIES YOUR ARTERIES

The body treats the calcium in your blood like a nonnegotiable life raft. A severe drop in serum calcium causes fatal muscle spasms.

So evolution built a hair-trigger hormonal system that sacrifices everything else to keep that raft afloat.

At the center of this system sit four tiny parathyroid glands tucked behind your thyroid. They constantly sample the blood for ionized calcium.

The moment they sense a shortfall, they release parathyroid hormone (PTH), the body’s calcium emergency signal.

THE HORMONE THAT STRIPS BONE

PTH does not politely request more dietary calcium.
It orders osteoclasts, the bone-dissolving cells, to break down your skeleton.

Calcium floods out of bone and into the bloodstream.

A modern diet that excludes dairy often starves the body of calcium while overloading it with phosphorus from meat, grains, nuts, and seeds.

When the calcium-to-phosphorus ratio tips too low, the PTH alarm never fully shuts off. You enter a chronic state of secondary hyperparathyroidism, quietly peeing out your skeleton.

HOW ARTERIES TURN TO BONE

A persistently high PTH signal forces open the gates for calcium entry into cells that have no business holding it.

The most dangerous destination is the smooth muscle inside artery walls. These cells are meant to contract and relax, not store calcium.

Under the relentless pressure of PTH, they undergo a phenotypic switch. They stop expressing muscle proteins and start activating bone-building genes.

Your arterial wall begins to biologically lay down calcium-phosphate crystals, an active process that turns vessel into bone.

THE MITOCHONDRIAL COLLAPSE

Inside the arterial cell, the excess calcium creates a metabolic catastrophe. Mitochondria, the cellular power plants, take up the calcium as a short-term buffer.

But the flood depolarizes their inner membranes, stalling ATP production and eventually opening the mitochondrial permeability transition pore.

The mitochondria swell, rupture, and cellular respiration ceases. Energy production grinds to a halt, and carbon dioxide output plummets. This collapse of CO2 production is a hidden accelerator of calcification.

THE CO2 CONNECTION

We think of CO2 as a waste gas, but in blood it acts as the critical solubility partner for calcium. It helps keep calcium safely dissolved as soluble calcium bicarbonate. When CO2 drops, calcium phosphate precipitates out of solution as insoluble crystals.

Those crystals are the same material that stuffs kidney stones, stiffens joints, and hardens arteries.

Every breath you take influences your ability to keep calcium in its harmless, dissolved form. Without adequate CO2 production, calcification proceeds unchecked.

THE RIPPLE EFFECTS: MAGNESIUM, THYROID, AND THE GUT

PTH is a hormonal network hub, and it drags other systems down with it. It stimulates aldosterone from the adrenal glands, causing magnesium wasting in the kidneys.

Every ATP molecule needs magnesium to function, so you lose the very cofactor required to clear calcium from cells.

Aldosterone also promotes vascular stiffening and, adding insult to injury, loops back to stimulate even more PTH release.

Simultaneously, PTH triggers prolactin, which blocks the conversion of T4 into active T3 thyroid hormone, particularly in the liver. The result is a suppressed metabolic rate and slowed gut motility.

A sluggish gut breeds more bacterial endotoxins that leak into the bloodstream. Those endotoxins further impair the liver’s ability to activate thyroid hormone.

The entire hormonal web tightens around a low-calcium, high-phosphorus dietary pattern.

WHAT THE DATA ACTUALLY SHOWS

The observational studies that once linked dairy to heart disease failed to account for serum PTH. When you ignore PTH, dairy gets blamed for the arterial damage caused by a parathyroid system running wild in its absence.

The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) found that dietary calcium from food protected against vascular calcification.

Synthetic calcium supplements, by contrast, increased calcification risk. The CARDIA study added another layer: whole-fat dairy intake was linked to a 24% lower risk of coronary artery calcification.

Low-fat dairy, stripped of its fat-soluble vitamins, offered no such protection.

The fear-driven avoidance of whole milk sets off a cascade that mineralizes arteries and dissolves bone.

The problem was never the saturated fat. It was the hormonal void left by a missing mineral, a void that PTH fills with destructive force.

The detailed practical remedies, and a bullet-point action cheat sheet, are in Parts 2 and 3 below.

[Marhelm @MarhelmData]

LNG shortages are doing what climate policy couldn't.

APAC thermal coal demand is projected to surge from ~440 Mt to ~500 Mt in 2026 (+60 Mt).

Japan, South Korea and Taiwan alone add ~37 Mt.

When gas disappears, coal comes back.

[Dalton (Analyze & Optimize) @Outdoctrination]

Why VINEGAR is a metabolic hack:

Vinegar's primary component is acetic acid, also known as acetate.

Acetate has a unique metabolism in comparison to other fuels, disproportionately increasing the AMP/ATP ratio in the cytosol of cells.

This turns on a master kinase known as AMPK, which:

➜ Ramps up metabolic enzymes
➜ Turns down fat production
➜ Increases uptake of glucose
➜ Reduces inflammation
➜ Enhances mitochondrial function

and other protective effects.

This means your cells are primed to take up more glucose and burn it properly - resulting in better insulin sensitivity.

AMPK is actually a primary target of the blockbuster diabetes drug metformin.

Vinegar does it and also doesn't inhibit your mitochondria in the process like metformin does.

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

This is a really fascinating paper that everyone interested in China's industrial policy should read.

It destroys so many myths (see below), and is written by deeply credible people who conducted over three years of fieldwork in China and interviewed 60+ Chinese officials, entrepreneurs, and engineers. When it comes to China studies, it literally doesn't get more rigorous than this.

First myth it destroys: contrary to popular belief, Beijing's industrial policy didn't build the companies that became China's EV champions. They rose largely **despite** it, through its cracks.

For sure, Beijing did favor EVs as an industry and pushed hard for it but their big bet was SOEs (State Owned Enterprises): research grants, pilot programs, licenses, cheap credit - virtually all of it flowed to state firms.

The result? China's actual EV champions - BYD, Geely, NIO, XPeng, Li Auto, etc. - are overwhelmingly private firms that succeeded despite Beijing favoring their SOE competitors.

How so? Because, when favoring SOEs, the central government didn't just pick winning companies, it picked winning cities, each SOE being anchored in a specific city: Shanghai (SAIC), Changchun (FAW), Wuhan-Shiyan (Dongfeng), etc.

Which means that every city not on the list, that wanted a piece of the auto boom, had only one option left: team up with private entrepreneurs who were equally excluded from central government favor.

That's what truly fueled China's EV miracle: an alliance of the excluded, between local private entrepreneurs and local mayors.

This is the biggest misconception this paper destroys: the reality is that the "Chinese state capitalism" that many in the West think powered the EV boom actually tried to block many of these companies from existing. In effect, it was closer to an obstacle course that local actors (mayors and provinces) learned to game.

Geely - now the third largest automaker in China - is a fantastic example of this.

First of all, it started off illegal since, to build passenger cars, you had to have a central government license and they couldn't get one. Zhejiang Province told them to go ahead regardless because the province had hundreds of auto parts suppliers but no carmaker of its own.

It's only a couple of years later, recognizing the fait-accompli that Geely was producing cars and was competitive, that the central government admitted them to the National Sedan Catalog - effectively legalizing them retroactively because there were facts on the ground.

Then there was the Volvo acquisition in 2010, which is fair to say - looking back - proved to be the most strategically valuable acquisition in Chinese automotive history. Despite it being presented at the time (and still described this way today) as "China buying Volvo", all 3 major state-backed banks in China (Export-Import Bank, China Development Bank, Bank of China) refused to finance the deal. The only state-bank money Geely managed to get was a $200 million loan from a provincial branch of China Construction Bank - a tiny fraction of what the deal required.

Geely actually did the deal with Goldman Sachs money via Hong Kong plus loans and equity from four local governments (Chengdu, Zhangjiakou, Daqing, Shanghai's Jiading district), each of which bought in by securing a Volvo plant or headquarters for itself.

In effect, the doors that Beijing controlled were largely closed to Geely, but it made it because the doors subnational actors controlled were opened.

Which all means this paper destroys another very common myth: the big merit of the central government in all this was to be relatively chill about it, to NOT be dictatorial.

I just imagine if that had happened in France and you had - say - the mayor of Lyon or Marseilles open, fund and promote an unlicensed carmaker against Renault: the préfet would shut it down within weeks, and the mayor would be lucky to escape prosecution.

That's the irony: on industrial policy, the supposedly "totalitarian" Chinese state proved more tolerant of local defiance than most Western liberal democracies would be. Beijing's greatest contribution to the EV miracle wasn't the plan - it was looking the other way while the plan was being violated.

To be sure, the paper doesn't hide the costs of this system: ferocious local competition also produced what's known today in China as "involution" (内卷-Neijuan, basically a hypercompetitive price war), as well as some spectacular failures. For instance one county lost 6.6 billion yuan on a carmaker that never really made cars.

But that's precisely the point: this is a high-risk, high-reward model of decentralized experimentation, the very opposite of the careful central planning Westerners imagine.

I've repeated this countless times but it bears repeating again: the single greatest misconception people have about China is - probably because we wrongly associate communism with centralized control - that it is a monolith run from Beijing. Some even say it's run by "one man."

The reality is the exact opposite: China is, in practice, one of the most decentralized countries on earth. Roughly 85% of government spending in China happens at the subnational level - against about 30% in the average OECD country (and even less in France, which is actually one of the most centrally controlled countries on earth). A Chinese mayor commands fiscal resources, land, investment funds and policy latitude that virtually no Western mayor could dream of.

Last but not least, I'd be remiss not to mention what the paper has to say on the positive legacy of Mao and its role in the rise of EVs (given I myself wrote an article titled "Mao's economic record wasn't bad, actually": https://t.co/1NZgHqBHwg).

When it comes to China myths, none is more entrenched than the idea that Mao left behind nothing but ruins.

This paper confirms a key argument of my article: Mao's deliberate dispersal of industry across China (during the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution decentralizations) left dozens of cities with their own small auto works. Inefficient, yes - but these scattered factories survived into the 1990s and became the seed stock of everything that followed: the industrial base, the engineers, and the production licenses that EV startups would use to enter the market.

The paper even says it outright: the fragmentation that industrial policy "sought to eradicate" is "precisely" what "ironically enabled" the EV sector's rapid rise.

This is exactly the mechanism I described in my Mao article: structures built in the Mao era - communes becoming township governments, commune enterprises becoming TVEs, Third Front factories seeding interior industrialization - became load-bearing foundations of the reform miracle.

Fittingly, the spark for China's first municipal carmaker adventure was literally a TVE (Township and Village Enterprise), the institutional descendants of Mao's commune enterprises: Tongbao, a kit-car maker in Wuhu whose success stunned local officials into building what became Chery (one of China's biggest carmakers today). You can't tell the story of China's EV miracle without crediting the legacy of Mao.

What's the biggest lesson in all this for Western policymakers?

The obvious one is that the part of industrial policy that most people assume China does and that they sometimes want to copy - i.e. the state picking winners - is actually the part that failed.

The part that did succeed is the China nobody in the West believes exists: a radically decentralized system with a high degree of tolerance for disobedience and experimentation.

We imagine China as a country where nothing happens without Beijing's approval when the reality is closer to the opposite: China's EV miracle happened precisely because localities asked for forgiveness rather than permission.

All in all, and this is the lesson I often come back to, this is yet another illustration of the importance of understanding China for what it is as opposed to the caricature we've built of it. This matters whichever "camp" you're in. If you see China as a rival, you can't compete with someone you don't understand. If you see them as a source of lessons, you can't emulate what you've misunderstood. Whatever you want from China - to compete with it or learn from it - the entry fee is the same: genuinely understanding it.

[Simon Dixon @SimonDixonTwitt]

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Most important point in the reported 14-point deal, because it explains the rest:

The US and its allies would support reconstruction plans for Iran worth at least $300 billion.

That tells you almost everything you need to know.

Combined with sanctions relief, it helps explain why a deal could be reached in exchange for Iran and the GCC allowing the Financial Industrial Complex (FIC) to profit from normalization, reconstruction, investment flows, and regional integration, while simultaneously negotiating an exit from a Military Industrial Complex (MIC) forever-war framework with China & BRICS.

The rest was execution.

The on-again, off-again negotiations look less like failed diplomacy and more like checkpoints along a broader process.

There will be more checkpoints to come.

The war was not separate from the negotiations.

The war was part of the negotiations.

Israel was MIC bad cop.

US was FIC good cop.

IRGC was negotiation resistance.

If you’ve been following my work for years, you’ll know exactly why this matters and how it fits into the larger thesis I’ve been discussing since 2023.

And it’s no surprise that this happened today either.

SpaceX needs a pump.

The drama does not end here, but the direction will be the same in my opinion.

Follow the money.

See you on my live show tonight.

[Mark Kaplan @markkaplan20]

I used to wonder why doctors fight so hard to defend LDL and ApoB.

Then I understood.

Imagine you are a cardiologist. You have spent 30 years prescribing statins. You have told thousands of patients their cholesterol is the problem. Your guidelines say it. Your training says it. Your colleagues say it.

Now imagine a study proves it was never the main driver.

What do you do with that?

Dugani et al. JAMA Cardiology. 2021. 28,024 women. 21.4 years. 50+ biomarkers ranked by heart disease risk.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

I accidentally discovered how to read a complete book in 30 minutes.

A Harvard student showed me the workflow. Here's exactly what he does.

He doesn't open a book and start reading from page one.

He said that's the slowest, most inefficient way to absorb a book ever invented. You read linearly, your brain has no context for what matters, and by chapter four you've already forgotten chapter one.

He does something different.

He uploads the entire book into NotebookLM first.

Then he runs one prompt before touching a single page.

"What is the single central argument this book is making? What does the author believe that most people don't? And what are the 5 most important ideas I need to understand before everything else makes sense?"

That prompt does something most people don't realize. It gives your brain a skeleton before the flesh goes on. You are no longer reading to discover what the book is about. You already know. Now every page you read is confirming, extending, or challenging something you already hold in your head.

That is a completely different cognitive experience.

The second prompt is the one that saves the most time.

"Which chapters or sections contain the core ideas? Which ones are examples, case studies, or repetition of things already said?"

Most nonfiction books are 60 to 70 percent padding. Not because the authors are dishonest. Because publishers want 250 pages, not 80. The actual argument usually lives in four or five chapters. The rest is illustration.

NotebookLM tells him exactly which four chapters to read. He reads those. He skips the rest.

He is not missing anything. He is cutting everything that was never the point.

The third prompt is what separates this from summarizing.

After reading the core chapters, he goes back and asks: "What questions does this book not answer? What would a hostile critic say is wrong with the central argument? Where does the evidence feel weakest?"

This is the move that most people never make. They read. They absorb. They move on. They have opinions given to them by the author and they carry those opinions around as if they built them themselves.

He stress-tests the book before he closes it. He knows where it holds and where it doesn't. That is not reading. That is thinking with the book as a sparring partner.

The final prompt is the one I use every time now.

"If I had to explain this book's core idea to a smart 14-year-old in three sentences, what would I say? And what is the single most actionable thing the author wants the reader to do differently after finishing?"

That prompt forces compression. And compression forces understanding. You cannot compress what you do not actually understand.

I read four books last month this way.

I retained more from each one than I have from any book I read cover to cover in the last two years.

The average person reads a 300-page book in six hours and forgets most of it within a week. He reads the same book in 30 minutes and can still argue its central thesis six months later.

The book didn't change. The interface did.

Most people are reading books the way they were designed to be sold.

He reads them the way they were designed to be understood.

[Metabolic Uncle @MetabolicUncle]

YOUR LIVER DOESN'T NEED A CLEANSE. IT NEEDS ATP.

The wellness industry profits from the idea that your body is dirty and must be scrubbed with juices, herbs, and binders. The underlying biology tells a quieter but far more practical story.

Your liver's detoxification system is not a passive filter that you flush. It is an active, energy-hungry assembly line that depends on ATP and specific raw materials to operate.

Think of the liver's machinery as a three-step production line. Step one (Phase I) uses enzymes to attach a chemical handle to a fat-soluble toxin, making it more water-reactive. You might picture this as tagging a package for export.

Step two (Phase II) clips different water-loving molecules onto that handle so the toxin becomes easy to dissolve and eliminate. Step three (Phase III) actively shoves the finished product into bile or blood for removal.

Every single step costs energy. The liver burns through glucose and ATP to run these reactions.

Glucuronidation, one of the major Phase II pathways, draws directly from glycogen stores. Sulfation consumes two ATP molecules for every sulfate activation. Amino acid conjugation gobbles up mitochondrial ATP and coenzyme A.

When you do a juice cleanse or fast, you drain the glycogen tanks these pathways rely on. Energy production drops. Thyroid hormone conversion, which governs metabolism, slows down.

The assembly line stalls. And a stalled line is worse than a slow one.

Phase I often churns out intermediates that are more chemically aggressive than the original toxin. If Phase II cannot keep pace because the liver is starved, those reactive fragments pile up.

They attack cardiolipin in the mitochondrial membrane, disrupting the cell's power plants and deepening the energy crisis. You haven't cleansed anything. You have jammed the machinery.

The popular binders, activated charcoal, zeolite, chlorella, make this worse in a different way. Wellness culture presents them as magnets that selectively grab toxins from the gut. The physical chemistry is far less discriminating.

These substances adsorb or chelate things based on size, charge, and chemical structure. They snag magnesium, zinc, copper, and selenium right alongside any heavy metals.

Mineral depletion hits antioxidant defenses hard. Copper and zinc are essential for superoxide dismutase, the enzyme that neutralizes superoxide radicals. Selenium is the core of glutathione peroxidase, which quenches hydrogen peroxide and lipid damage.

Magnesium acts as an obligatory cofactor for the enzyme that builds glutathione. Without enough magnesium, glutathione synthesis collapses.

So while someone believes they are pulling toxins out, their own frontline protection against toxin-induced damage gets dismantled. The system left behind is more vulnerable, not less.

The provoked urine testing trap deserves a clear look. An alternative clinic gives you a chelator like DMPS or DMSA, then measures urinary metals. Even very low, harmless levels of lead or mercury stored in tissues get mobilized and create a sharp spike on the test.

The clinic compares that spike to a normal baseline and diagnoses chronic toxicity. The test itself manufactures the abnormal result.

Research has shown a positive predictive value of just over four percent. That means ninety-six out of a hundred people flagged by this test do not have true metal toxicity.

Expert medical bodies have warned against post-chelator challenge testing for years because of these numbers and because the chelators themselves can damage kidneys and deplete electrolytes.

Aggressive chelation poses a redistribution danger. Metal-chelator complexes can fall apart in the bloodstream. Once freed, reactive metals travel.

Mercury hitches a ride on a cysteine molecule that mimics the amino acid methionine. The brain's transport system mistakes this complex for the real thing and carries mercury straight into neural tissue, where it latches onto structural proteins and antioxidant enzymes.

Lead and cadmium, similarly released, head to the kidneys and accumulate in mitochondria. The procedure intended to heal can end up doing the damage.

Your body has other exit routes that bypass the liver's energy bottleneck. The lymphatic system clears macromolecules and debris from the spaces between cells. It has no central pump.

Instead, smooth muscle cells in the vessel walls contract spontaneously to push fluid along. But these contractions are exquisitely sensitive to the local chemical environment.

When cells rely on anaerobic metabolism and produce lactic acid, lymph pumping can fall by seventy to ninety percent. Healthy aerobic metabolism, by contrast, produces carbon dioxide and supports a pH that keeps the lymphatic vessels squeezing.

Simple habits can keep this system moving. Diaphragmatic breathing creates pressure gradients in the chest that pull lymph through the main duct.

Walking engages the calf muscles and the gentle twisting of the spine to compress deeper lymph channels. These activities stimulate clearance without spiking cortisol, which itself can suppress thyroid function and metabolism.

Skin-based elimination through sweating offers another path. Lipophilic chemicals like bisphenol A and phthalates get stuck in fat tissue and resist being urinated out. Infrared heat can penetrate and warm subcutaneous fat, mobilizing those compounds.

Heat also triggers sympathetic nerves to activate sweat glands. Heavy metals and other unwanted substances exit through the sweat, bypassing the liver altogether. This neatly sidesteps the problem of enterohepatic recirculation, where gut bacteria can break the bonds that tag toxins for removal and send them back into the bloodstream.

The real path forward is consistent daily support for the existing detox pathways. That means supplying the right fuel, protecting mineral status, and engaging natural clearance routes without provoking inflammation or depletion.

The detailed practical application of these remedies follows in Part 2, along with a quick-reference bullet cheat sheet in Part 3.

[Gavin (humanist/acc) @GavMcCracken]

I bought $JOY.TO today and the new stock I mentioned in my last article.

Fuck this oil market, the strait is still fuckin' closed

[Daniel Tawfik @dantawfik]

Creatine is known for building muscle and improving athletic performance. A new UCLA study just found it does something completely different—it powers the immune cells that direct your body's cancer-fighting response.

Researchers published the findings in iScience after studying both mouse models and human cells. The discovery builds on earlier work showing creatine fuels killer T cells that attack tumors directly. Now they've found creatine also energizes dendritic cells—the immune cells that capture tumor fragments and train T cells where to strike.

Most cancer immunotherapies target killer T cells directly, but only 20-40% of patients respond. The limitation isn't the T cells themselves. It's the dendritic cells upstream that activate and direct them.

The research team started by examining which metabolic genes were most active in dendritic cells that had infiltrated tumors in mice. One gene stood out: the creatine transporter, which pulls creatine into cells. It was markedly elevated in tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells compared to those in healthy tissue.

To test whether this mattered, they engineered dendritic cells that couldn't transport creatine. These cells showed impaired survival, reduced activation, and weakened ability to prime T cells for tumor response. When grown alongside T cells in a lab dish, those T cells divided less and produced fewer cancer-fighting signaling molecules.

Then they tested the opposite intervention—increasing creatine instead of removing it. Daily creatine injections in melanoma-bearing mice significantly slowed tumor growth and boosted both the number and activation of dendritic cells infiltrating tumors. The creatine-treated dendritic cells produced higher levels of chemical signals that recruit additional immune cells to the tumor site.

Metabolomics analysis revealed the mechanism: creatine supplementation raised intracellular ATP levels in dendritic cells. ATP is the energy currency cells use to power nearly every function. Creatine acts like a battery—storing and releasing energy on demand, helping dendritic cells maintain stable energy levels even when competing with fast-growing tumor cells for nutrients.

The effect extended to human cells. Creatine treatment enhanced activation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells—the type often used in dendritic cell cancer vaccines—and improved their ability to stimulate human T cells against cancer-associated targets.

The findings suggest incorporating creatine during manufacturing of dendritic cell vaccines may boost their therapeutic potency. More broadly, they reveal that creatine doesn't just help the immune cells fighting cancer directly—it energizes the infrastructure that supports and guides them.

Immuotherapy works for some patients but fails for most. The difference may come down to whether dendritic cells can maintain enough energy to properly activate the T cell response. Creatine supplementation addresses that metabolic constraint.

A supplement taken by millions for muscle growth and athletic performance turns out to support immune cell function at a fundamental metabolic level—powering both the killer T cells that attack tumors and the dendritic cells that train them where to go.

[🏴‍☠️ @calvinfroedge]

Even if Hormuz opened tomorrow, you don't have enough ships positioned for a reopening

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A German psychologist spent her career proving that the embarrassing habit of talking to your dog is one of the most powerful stress-regulation tools the human nervous system has, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Andrea Beetz.

She works at the University of Rostock in northern Germany, in the Department of Special Education.

In 2012 she co-authored a paper in Frontiers in Psychology with three other European researchers, and the finding inside it should have changed how every doctor on Earth thinks about loneliness, stress, and the strange habit human beings have of narrating their lives to animals who cannot speak back.

The paper was not a single experiment. It was a review of 69 separate peer-reviewed studies on what happens inside the human body during interactions with pets, all of which met strict criteria for sample size, research design, and scientific rigor.

Her co-authors were not minor names either. Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg is the Swedish physician who spent decades mapping how oxytocin works in the human bloodstream. Kurt Kotrschal runs the Wolf Science Center in Austria and is one of the most respected animal cognition researchers in Europe. Henri Julius studies attachment between humans and animals. Together they assembled the cleanest summary of what science actually knows about why being around a pet changes a person.

The results across the 69 studies were almost embarrassingly consistent. When a human being interacts with an animal they have any bond with, the same physiological cascade happens almost every time. Cortisol drops, which is the primary stress hormone in the bloodstream. Blood pressure drops, both systolic and diastolic. Heart rate slows. Self-reported anxiety decreases. Mood improves measurably on standardized scales.

And underneath all of it, the hormone called oxytocin rises in the human bloodstream.

Oxytocin is the molecule that floods a mother's body during childbirth and breastfeeding. It is the same chemical released during orgasm, during a long hug with someone you love, during the deep eye contact between a parent and a newborn.

It is the hormone the human body uses to mark another living being as safe, familiar, and worth bonding with. It widens the blood vessels, slows the heart, suppresses the production of cortisol, and quietly tells the nervous system that the threat level in the environment is low enough that the body can repair itself instead of bracing for danger.

The 69 studies the team reviewed found that the same molecule rises in the human bloodstream when you pet your dog, hold your cat, watch your fish, or talk softly to a parrot that does not understand a single word you are saying.

The strangest finding in the whole paper is that the animal does not have to understand you for the system to work. The mechanism is not based on actual comprehension.

It is based on the act of directing social attention toward a living presence and feeling, on some level, that the presence is paying attention back. The brain only requires perceived reciprocity. It does not require real reciprocity.

In 2015, a Japanese research team led by Miho Nagasawa published a study in the journal Science that pushed the finding even further. They measured oxytocin levels in 30 dog and owner pairs before and after the dogs and owners interacted for 30 minutes.

When dogs and owners exchanged long periods of eye contact, oxytocin rose in both species. Not just in the human. In the dog too. And the longer the gaze, the bigger the spike on both sides of the leash. The same study tried the experiment with hand-raised wolves and got nothing. The loop was specific to the bond that domestic dogs and humans had spent 15,000 years building together.

What Beetz and her team had identified through 69 studies, Nagasawa proved with direct hormone measurements in a controlled lab. The act of looking into your dog's eyes and talking to it is running the same neurochemical program that a mother runs with her newborn baby. The brain treats the interaction as social bonding because, biologically, it is.

The implication is the part that should change how you live. People who narrate their day to their dog are not lonely or strange. They are using one of the oldest stress-regulation systems the human nervous system has ever built. The habit looks embarrassing from the outside and feels completely natural from the inside because it is doing exactly what the body evolved to do when a safe presence is nearby.

The research was clean enough that the entire field of Animal-Assisted Therapy was built on top of it. Therapy dogs now work in hospitals, psychiatric wards, schools for children with autism, prisons, hospice care, and disaster relief sites across more than 30 countries. The protocols are formal. The interventions are measurable. The science behind why a dog in the room lowers a patient's blood pressure during chemotherapy is the same science Beetz and her team summarized in 2012.

The most haunting line in the paper is the one near the end where the authors point out that the oxytocin pathway evolved long before language did. The system was already in place when our ancestors lived in caves and the first wild dogs started circling human fires. The hormone never required words. It just required a body next to a body.

When you talk to your cat about your day, the words are doing almost nothing. The animal hearing your voice while you direct attention toward it is doing almost everything.

You can run the experiment yourself the next time you feel your nervous system tightening up. Stop scrolling, put the phone down, and sit on the floor with whatever animal is in your house. Talk to it. Look at it. Pet it. Let your shoulders drop.

The hormone the rest of the world is selling in podcasts and supplements is already inside you, waiting for the signal.

[Marhelm @MarhelmData]

Strategic oil releases set to fall off a cliff at the end of June