Philip John Adams

69 year old Marxist/Anarchist vegan, retired veterinarian, proud of my Romany heritage, Support JC, Assange ChrisWilliamson Ken Livingston Jaqueline Walker

[Mrs Galilee | Taghrid Al‑Mawed (تغريد الموعد) @TaghridAlMawed]

The British Museum has removed the word “Palestine” from its Ancient Middle East displays — despite the term appearing in Herodotus, Roman records, medieval maps, Ottoman sources, and even Shakespeare.

Erasing a word erases a people.

I’ve written about why this matters, and what we can do next. 👇
https://t.co/fBLQtOFNei

#HistoryIncludesPalestine

@21WIRE @AsaWinstanley @s_m_marandi @alon_mizrahi @FranceskAlbs @guychristensen_

[Richard @ricwe123]

While the EU President is spewing her usual bullshit crap about Russia keep in mind Alexei Navalny wanted to strip Chechens, Dargins, and all other nations in the Caucasus of their Russian citizenship and compared them to cockroaches and flies...

[Anatomy of Truth 🇨🇦 @e_l_g_c_a]

I can’t claim to know toxicology well but this is so absurd that I had to go check if I was remembering the basics correctly. Turns out it isn’t just absurd, it’s insanely sloppy and actually quite hilarious. Of all the things to pick, why pick something so implausible.

First, I checked what his circle claimed to be his symptomatology in 2024. The most prominent reported symptom in his final hours was sharp, severe abdominal pain plus vomiting and collapse. Epibatidine’s defining property is extreme analgesia, 100–200× more potent than morphine. It binds to neuronal nicotinic receptors (α4β2 subtype) to produce profound pain suppression and full-body numbness. Victims would become insensitive to pain, not hypersensitive. No literature in either animal or analog studies describes acute gastrointestinal agony as a hallmark. If anything, early nicotinic stimulation might cause mild nausea salivation, but the dominant effect is pain erasure. A dying victim screaming from stomach pain is the opposite of what epibatidine does.

This is boring but important, natural occurrence is actively disputed. Original 1970s samples yielded <1 mg from thousands of frogs; later collections from the same species found zero epibatidine. Apparently, frogs don’t synthesize it, they sequester it from wild diet in specific microhabitats. Captive or non-specific populations produce none. Harvesting a lethal dose (LD₅₀ ~2–14 μg/kg) naturally would require processing thousands of protected wild frogs from remote Ecuador. How would this be possible without anyone noticing? Framing it as frog poison is pure theatre.

Did they smuggle old post-mortem samples two years after death / cremation or was it earlier? Epibatidine is a small, non-persistent molecule. In vitro studies suggest it’s minimally metabolized, but no data exists on long-term stability in embalmed/cremated remains or degraded tissue. There is no precedent I could find for detecting epibatidine in any human poisoning, ever. Labs would have to extrapolate from rodent models and synthetic standards, how can they have “conclusive” proof?

Epibatidine has never been documented as a homicide agent. Why would Russia who supposedly has sophisticated domestic agents switch to an obscure, hyper-potent nicotinic agonist especially on a “high profile” prisoner? It’s a prison colony, I’m sure that there are far less complex options to cause a prisoner’s untimely demise. Also the poison frog experts (I didn’t know it was a thing lol) call it “very surprising” as a weapon choice, no military or intelligence program has ever pursued it.

Also, how did they pull off the logistics for administering this in a remote arctic colony? Did the FSB agents fly in with ready-made injections when drug trials failed to make any headway with synthetics for years? I can add another 10 “also”s but this seems like a good starting point.

Any toxicologists or poison frog experts feel like weighing in?

[David Miller @Tracking_Power]

2,000 baby killer British citizens. They walk amongst us.

Remember that the figure of 2,000 is a snap shot of ‘current’ members of the genocidal occupation forces. There are likely thousands more, even if we only consider those involved in war crimes since the launch of Al Aqsa Flood on 7 October 2023.

Every one needs tracked down and bought to justice.

#DismantleZionism

[Dr Rahmeh Aladwan @doctor_rahmeh]

Convicted fraudster and zionist jew 'Sir' Gerald Ronson is the founder of the UK's flagship 'anti-Semitism' watchdog, the Community Security Trust (CST).

Ronson appears in the Epstein files. He is listed among individuals a potential cooperating witness believes had 'some involvement or contact with GM and JE.'

He is also named in leaked documents as a funder of war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu's political campaigns—alongside Leslie Wexner, co-conspirator of convicted paedophile and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Ronson's business empire (Heron International) spans property, petrol stations, and finance. He has family in 'israel'.

Timeline:
1990: Ronson is convicted for his role in the Guinness scandal, one of Britain's most high-profile white-collar crime cases. He serves 6 of 12 months and pays a £5 million fine.

2012: Ronson is awarded CBE.

2024: Ronson is knighted. He is now 'Sir' Gerald Ronson.

Between his conviction and knighthood, in 1994, Ronson founded CST—ostensibly to 'protect UK jewish communities' from 'Anti-Semitism'.

The reality: CST is a Mossad-linked lobby group with deep government and police ties. It has over 2,000 trained volunteers/personnel and works closely with police nationally/regional/local levels (including joint patrols and data sharing). It also collaborates with Shomrim—the UK jewish police.

CST's chief executive has referred to Shomrim as 'friends' alongside groups like Hatzola (jewish ambulance).

In February 2024, the British government announced a £72 million funding package for 'protective security' for the jewish community, administered through CST. Emergency top-ups have followed, including £10 million in October 2025—the largest dedicated allocation for any UK community group facing 'hate crime threats'.

Two days ago, CST published its 'antisemitic incidents' report for 2025. Over 50% of the incidents recorded were related to Palestine and the genocide. This is the 'hate crime' they receive funding for.

Let that sink in.

A pro-'israel' British jew convicted fraudster turned knight, with documented links to Epstein and Netanyahu, receives millions in British taxpayer money—via an organisation he founded—to police British citizens and attack civil liberties and free speech for opposing a foreign entity. An entity committing genocide.

This is institutional capture.
This is occupied Britain.

[Craig Murray @CraigMurrayOrg]

The Jewish communities. What about the Palestinian community you racists?

And how dare you conflate support for the Palestinians and protest against Genocide with antisemitism.

[Philip John Adams @PhilipJohnAdam1]

Sobering thoughts from Craig Murray. I have to say that after the scandalous decision to replace the judge, the outcome of the case did seem rather too good to be true!

[Craig Murray @CraigMurrayOrg]

Postpone The Celebrations - On the face of it the English High Court ruling that the Palestine Action proscription is unlawful makes the decision that the proscription remains in place pending appeal utterly illogical. But what if the High Court ruling is https://t.co/bEAoIk8PRx

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

In America, the oligarchs do not fight the president—they fund him.

They do not hide. They sit in the front row.
They donate, they lobby, they dine in the White House.
Then they return to their corporations and write policy like their own personal diary.

The revolving door never stops spinning.
Regulators become executives.
Generals become board members.
Senators become lobbyists.
It is not corruption—it is the system.
It is not a scandal—it is the design.

In Russia, there was a different story.
In the 1990s, the oligarchs owned the country.
They took factories, oil, gas, media.
They sat above the law. They chose presidents from menus.

Then Putin arrived.

He did not negotiate. He did not compromise.
He looked at the men who had swallowed Russia and said: enough.
Some fled. Some surrendered. Some never made it to the airport.
The Kremlin was no longer for rent.
The oligarchs were put back in their cages—
free to make money,
but forbidden to touch the state.

They still have yachts. They still have London mansions.
But they do not command armies. They do not write laws.
They do not sit in Parliament and vote themselves immunities.
The leash is short. The hand on it is steady.

China went further.

Here, oligarchs were never born.
Here, the state did not wait for thieves to accumulate power—
it locked the door before they arrived.
Business exists to serve the nation, not capture it.
Wealth is permitted. Empire is not.

A Chinese businessman does not sit beside the President at dinner and whisper policy into his ear.
He does not fund political campaigns. There are no campaigns to fund.
He does not own television networks to shape public opinion.
He does not place his sons in ministries and his daughters on central bank boards.

The separation is not polite—it is absolute.
Money and power breathe the same air, but they do not sleep in the same bed.
The Party watches. The law watches. The people watch.

In the West, this is called authoritarian.
Perhaps they should look at their own reflection.
Who really lives under authoritarianism?
The citizen who must obey?
Or the billionaire who owns the politician who owns the law?

In America, a man with enough money can buy a senator.
In Russia, a man with too much ambition can lose everything.
In China, a man with wealth never imagines owning power—
because he knows, from the first dollar,
that is not how this country works.

So the West lectures.
But the West's oligarchs still roam free.
Still funding elections. Still shaping courts. Still owning truth.
Still untouched. Still untouchable.

Russia caged its beasts.
China never allowed them in the room.
The West still feeds them at the table.
And calls it democracy.

[Zarah Sultana MP @zarahsultana]

A billionaire worth £17,000,000,000 who moved to Monaco to dodge £4,000,000,000 in tax is now blaming immigrants for Britain’s problems.

If parasitic billionaires like Jim Ratcliffe paid what they owe — and politicians weren’t in their pockets — our NHS, schools and public services wouldn’t be on their knees.

It is textbook divide and rule. The real enemy of the working class travels by private jet, not migrant dinghy.

[Abier @abierkhatib]

British citizen Paddy Friend, a 25 yo law student, faces up to 14 years in prison for organizing a Defend Our Juries protest, where he suggested on Zoom that participants hold placards supporting Palestine Action.

Now read that again

[Tehran Tadhg @TadhgHickey]

A video I made over a year ago in support of Lebanese human rights has just been removed from YouTube and deemed 'unsafe'. We're now entering the 'retrospective censorship' stage of tech totalitarianism.

[Asa Winstanley @AsaWinstanley]

Israel's Auschwitz law.

[Jonathan Cook @Jonathan_K_Cook]

Emergency crews in Gaza report identifying nearly 3,000 Palestinians "evaporated" by Israeli fireball bombs supplied by the US. There are likely to be many more they could find no trace of at all.

This is on top of those killed by ordinary bombs, those crushed under the rubble, those starved to death and those killed by Israel's destruction of Gaza's entire medical sector.

More here:
https://t.co/N3eSqGzMxK

[Craig Murray @CraigMurrayOrg]

This is ridiculous.
I have 215k followers.
After 20 mins this has 300 views.

[Caitlin Johnstone @caitoz]

Our leaders are not going to fix the worst problems in our world. They couldn’t if they wanted to. And they don’t want to.

Our leaders are not wise or insightful. They’re not even particularly intelligent. Our society is led by plutocrats who only know how to make more money, by unelected empire managers who only know how to dominate and control, and by elected politicians who only know how to say the right words and make the right bargains in order to get themselves elected.

These people are not capable of curing our civilization of its dysfunction. They don’t have the necessary skills or attributes. Even if they weren’t a bunch of evil sociopaths who are only in the positions they’re in because of their willingness to collaborate with the agendas of oligarchy, war, militarism, imperialism, ecocide, exploitation, oppression and planetary domination, they don’t even have the personal characteristics necessary to do things like end poverty, rescue our biosphere, bring about world peace or give rise to human thriving. They’d have no idea where to start.

I say this because as I watch Americans and Australians falling all over themselves to justify the recent police brutality in our respective nations, I am struck by how many people still believe our society is run by leaders who more or less know what they are doing and will guide us to more or less where we need to be. They view their government as a wise and beneficent father who knows what’s best for all of us, and they believe anyone who disagrees with Daddy is being naughty.

That’s really all it is. They’ll make up all sorts of justifications and excuses, but ultimately their police apologia arises from an infantile worldview which believes the authorities are right for no other reason than because they are in authority. They begin with their tongue on the boot of power, and then they make up reasons for why their tongue needs to be there.

That’s the worldview that gets a lot of people through their day. Believing our society is basically just and decent, and that we don’t need to concern ourselves with the world’s problems because we’ve got highly qualified leaders working hard at fixing them.

Believing our society is just and decent allows one to relax under the assumption that they deserve all the comforts they have in life and that the system will never turn against them. If someone is killed by police, or is impoverished or imprisoned or homeless, then it’s because they did something wrong and immoral, and all you need to do to avoid the same fate is follow the rules and make ethical choices. Under a just and decent system, good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people, so all you need to do is be good and you’ll be fine, and if things are going badly for you it’s because you deserve it.

Believing we’ve got highly qualified leaders working on our world’s problems allows one to relax under the assumption that everything’s taken care of. There’s no need to concern ourselves with all the information which tells us we’re plunging deeper and deeper into tyrannical dystopia on a collision course with environmental catastrophe under a globe-spanning empire that is fueled by human blood, because Daddy’s got it all taken care of.

Really these are just juvenile fairy tales designed to help us psychologically compartmentalize away from uncomfortable realities; no grown adult has any business believing them. But a lot of people would do anything to avoid internal discomfort. Entire psychological universes are constructed around the unconscious agenda of not feeling unpleasant feelings.

Daddy’s not gonna save us, kiddos. Daddy’s a serial killer with dead bodies in the attic, and many important parts of his brain are missing. Our problems aren’t going to get fixed until we get rid of Daddy. Getting rid of Daddy means forcibly getting rid of the entire system under which we live and replacing it with something that serves the interests of ordinary human beings.

Bootlickers hate revolutionary politics, because it is diametrically opposed to their infantile worldview of paternalistic government deities. But things aren’t going to get better until we find a way to get the steering wheel of our world out of the hands of the people who are currently in charge. Until then, everything’s just going to keep getting worse.

[Canary @TheCanaryUK]

Australian police beat a 69 year old woman at an anti-genocide protest so badly that they've broken her spine in FOUR places

By @skwawkbox

https://t.co/FuankqxmQJ

[Jonathan Cook @Jonathan_K_Cook]

The four main takeaways from Channel 4's documentary on Palestine Action last night:

1. It reminded us that the Starmer government's proscription of the group as a terrorist organisation was done at the behest of Elbit Systems – the Israeli arms firm making killer drones used in Gaza targeted by Palestine Action.

Government officials regularly met with Elbit. A 2023 internal Home Office email, two years before proscription, states: "Reassure Elbit Systems UK and the wider sector affected by Palestine Action that the government cares about the harm the group is causing the private sector [arms industries]."

2. A senior official told the film-makers there was widespread belief among Home Office staff that the government was "wrong" to proscribe Palestine Action, and there was "disquiet" that the government was using Palestine Action as a way to curtail rights to protest and speech more generally.

3. The government's terrorism adviser, Jonathan Hall KC, made clear that there was zero evidence of any links between Palestine Action and Iran – a claim leaked to the press by government officials on the same day Palestine Action was proscribed. Private Eye had already reported in November that the claim was concocted by a PR firm for Elbit Systems.

4. Additionally, Lord Walney, the government's former "independent" adviser on political violence, who has been at the forefront of demanding even more draconian legislation to ban protest in relation to Israel and its genocide, struggled through his interview.

It was only too clear that his views on the subject had nothing to do with the public good but were shaped by his ties to the arms industries and his role as an Israel lobbyist.

What the programme made clear was that Starmer's government made the unprecedented decision to declare Palestine Action a terrorist organisation not because the group is a terrorist organisation but because large corporations – arms firms like Elbit – have captured the UK government.

[Caitlin Johnstone @caitoz]

In Australia the police beat you up for opposing genocide.

Australian authorities were fully aware that inviting Israel’s president for a visit was going to ignite unrest and furious opposition. They invited him anyway, and sent in the police to assault the protesters.

I saw a video of two cops pinning a kid in a keffiyeh face down on the ground and proceeding to punch him over and over again long after he’d been subdued.

I saw another video of police repeatedly punching a middle-aged man who was holding his hands in the air until he fell to the ground.

I saw another video of police repeatedly pepper spraying a demonstrator directly in the face as he was visibly complying with their demands to move and providing no resistance whatsoever.

I saw another video of police manhandling Muslim men who were literally on their knees praying, presenting no possible threat of any kind.

That’s right kids, welcome to Australia, where the government invites the head of a genocidal apartheid state for a happy cuddle party and then beats the shit out of anyone who opposes this.

It’s a testament to the courage and vitality of the pro-Palestine movement in Australia that people keep showing up to anti-genocide protests even as authorities do everything they can to create a chilling effect on them.

After all, this happens as the state of Queensland moves to make it illegal to utter the pro-Palestine phrases “from the river to the sea” or “globalise the intifada”, with violations punishable by two years in prison. This is easily the single most bat shit insane speech suppression legislation in Australian history, and that’s an extremely high bar.

To be clear, not one person sincerely believes that “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is a genocidal or antisemitic statement. This is one of those many, many instances in which Israel supporters are pretending to believe something they do not actually believe in order to further outlaw criticism of Israel.

They’re trying to make it so that nobody feels comfortable opposing Israel’s abuses without first consulting with a lawyer about what exactly they are legally permitted to say in that moment, thereby throwing a chilling effect on pro-Palestine activism throughout the nation.

This comes weeks after the Australian government passed frightening new “hate speech” laws in the name of “combatting antisemitism” which will make it much easier to designate activist groups as “hate groups”. Australian officials have conspicuously refused to say that the new laws will not be used to ban groups for speech that is critical of Israel, which tells you all you need to know about the real intentions at work here.

This also comes as the state of New South Wales cracks down on protests with extreme aggression, banning protests in certain areas and seeking to outlaw the use of the phrase “globalise the intifada” to appease Australia’s obscenely powerful Israel lobby. Premier Chris Minns is presently defending the actions of the police he sent in to crack skulls at the Herzog protests on Monday.

Just two months ago a prominent member of the Australian Israel lobby publicly announced that he wants a total ban on pro-Palestine protests throughout the nation, and said it is criticism of Israel that is the problem, not just hatred toward Jews. Joel Burnie, Executive Manager of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), explicitly said that what he wants is “No more protests! No more protests!” in Australia.

“I for one as a Jewish leader will no long talk about antisemitism in isolation from Israel, because it’s the rhetoric and language on Israel that motivates the people to come and kill us,” Burnie said during a video conference, later adding that “ language on Israel invading all of our social spaces in Australia have made this country a very unsafe space and place for Jews.”

Increment by increment, Joel Burnie and his ilk have been getting their wish ever since. Australian civil rights are indeed being disintegrated to protect the information interests of a genocidal apartheid state.

As I often remind readers, Australia is the only so-called democracy in the world which has no national charter or bill of rights of any kind. A tremendous amount of faith has been placed in state and federal legislators to simply do the right thing, which has proved foolish and ineffective. Professor George Williams wrote for the Melbourne University Law Review in 2006:

“Australia is now the only democratic nation in the world without a national bill of rights. Some comprehensive form of legal protection for basic rights is otherwise seen as an essential check and balance in democratic governance around the world. Indeed, I can find no example of a democratic nation that has gained a new Constitution or legal system in recent decades that has not included some form of a bill of rights, nor am I aware of any such nation that has done away with a bill of rights once it has been put in place.”

This system plainly does not work. Australians desperately need speech protections enshrined in our Constitution, because we cannot trust our leaders to resist efforts to silence us whenever our speech becomes inconvenient to powerful people and influential lobbying groups.

The more aggressively they fight to silence us, the louder we need to become. It is more necessary to oppose Israel and its supporters than ever before, because now they’re coming after us and our rights. It’s not just about opposing genocide, war and apartheid anymore. It’s about fighting for our own rights and our own future.

[Dr Rahmeh Aladwan @doctor_rahmeh]

Wesley Streeting destroyed my career as a Palestinian NHS doctor for speaking out against genocide, 'israel', and jewish supremacy.

Now he publishes his messages with Peter Mandelson—a close associate of 'israeli' spy, paedophile, and convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

In those messages, Streeting explicitly states: '"israel" is committing war crimes before our eyes... ethnic cleansing... calculated brutality.' He calls it 'rogue state behaviour.'

Yet he declares: 'I've never been a shrinking violent [violet] on Israel. I've supported LFI for over 20 years.'

This is 'Britain's' HEALTH Secretary.

He knows a genocide is happening, but his 20-year loyalty is to the lobby representing the perpetrator, not to the law, the British people, or to his duty to stop atrocities.

The same lobby that demanded my suspension. The same networks entangled with Epstein. The same minister who corruptly interfered in my tribunal.

Remember: after I won my tribunal, streeting threatened the 'independent' medical regulator (@gmcuk) and tribunal (@the_mpts) with lawfare PENDING the outcome of my retrial. A retrial initiated by his public comments and threats as well as legal threats from the 'israeli' jewish lobby. His interference led to my suspension for 15 months.

Streeting also introduced the IHRA definition into the NHS to silence all healthcare workers.

@wesstreeting must resign and be held accountable for betraying the UK's constitutional principles: the independence of regulators, the rule of law, and ministerial conduct free from foreign political interference.

Every treacherous MP and official whose loyaly lies with this lobby must be exposed and removed.

Most importantly, the 'israeli' jewish lobby must be shut down and banned.

[Jared Kimpton @jared_kimpton]

@allconnected8 @DavidShoebridge Someone caught it on camera.