Austin is reducing residential new construction review timelines by nearly 50% solely by changing the expected response date internally.
This is awesome.
These skyscrapers on the train station in Oakland were 100% illegal before state housing law
Several YIMBY laws are helping, but AB2923 in particular gave BART control of its own zoning
BART is a state corporation just like a city--now they can zone their own land like a city
American anti-data-center populism is a tool of the CCP.
If you’re a politician in the middle of a political fight about data centers, pick a side. Do your duty as a leader and as an American!
But this the tragic thing about wealth creation in San Francisco. In any other city this would be true. But in San Francisco, it just means: a bunch of dumpy tuck-under townhouses in the Sunset get a lot more expensive.
Two reasons we build sprawl rather than infill:
1) Construction costs. It depends on the market, but it's easily 2-3X more on $/SF basis to build infill as it does to build suburban sprawl homes. And the housing crisis is where Americans are saying "I just don't have any more money!" not "I wish the housing was better, I'd gladly pay more!"
2) Schools. Very few families who currently live in and can afford the $/SF of homes in dense areas can *also* afford private schools. The falling quality, and rising cost per student in the cities pushes them to look out to the suburbs
Pinal County just approved 3 separate data center projects in one meeting. La Osa near Eloy: 3,374 acres, $33B, 3 GW capacity. The Phoenix-Tucson corridor is coming for Northern Virginia's crown. 🔗 https://t.co/Ep87UL6VtV
Nothing here is crazy…
- moderate density
- simple, classical proportions
- narrow streets
- mixed-use
- human focused walkable infrastructure
We know how to do this, but we’ve made it illegal in 90% of America. To rebuild, we must first repeal the laws stopping us.