Olivia
Online
PieInTheSkyNews
@PieInTheSkyNews
Breaking news from the world’s most unreliable source. Reporting satirical stories that shouldn’t be true — but somehow are
UK
Joined April 2026
43 Following
66 Followers
627 Posts
@KEdge23 https://t.co/fQHiF3yV1h
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@emilyhewertson https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@David90shaw https://t.co/fQHiF3yV1h
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@GBPolitcs https://t.co/fQHiF3yV1h
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@reformparty_uk https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@Councillorsuzie https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@reformparty_uk https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
Labour wants to make it easier to commit voting fraud.
They are making a mockery of democracy.
@Nigel_Farage https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@BasilTheGreat https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@GHWTowler https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@Artemisfornow https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@GoodwinMJ https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@BasilTheGreat https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@darrengrimes https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@drchrisnewton https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@JournoMaddie https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@WasAcop https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@Britains_rights https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
@dshensmith https://t.co/fQHiF3ynbJ
LABOUR GOVERNMENT PUBLICLY ADMIT BEING OKAY WITH VOTER FRAUD..... as long as they win
Taking time away from developing phone apps, the Labour PM, Andy Bumham, has made a bold step towards making democracy as accessible as ordering a Deliveroo at 1 a.m., the government has decided that a non-photo bank card is now sufficient proof of identity to vote. Photo ID, previously required under those quaint 2023 rules, is apparently far too much hassle for something as trivial as choosing the next Prime Minister. A bank statement will do nicely—preferably one that shows a healthy overdraft, just to confirm how committed you are to spending cash you don't have, just like our government.
Critics have pointed out that this might make electoral fraud slightly easier. Nonsense. If someone is determined enough to impersonate you at the polling station using your debit card, they have already earned the right to cast your ballot. Besides, local heroes such as Andy are already racing to implement the changes, just in case an early election is called and we need maximum turnout from people who left their ID in their life vest.
The contrast with everyday life is, of course, stark. Consider the many vital activities for which Britain still demands rigorous photographic proof of identity:
Buying an energy drink, because a tired 16-year-old might otherwise destabilise the entire economy.
Buying a lottery ticket, especially if buy for a syndicate of 17 year olds.
Buying beer because a 17 year old enjoying a summer night in a park is higher risk than choosing the next government.
Renting a sunbed, joining a gym, buying a firework, or proving you are old enough to watch a film containing mild peril.
Voting, by comparison, is a low-stakes administrative formality. After all, once the ballots are counted, the result is merely the temporary administration of the country. Far more important is ensuring that no one under 18 purchases a four-pack of lager or wins the lottery.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
حائیفہ
Seen from Pakistan
_adios_o_mefui_ • Te sigue
Seen from United States
king
Seen from Bahrain
Aimee Martin
Seen from United States
Pecinta yang GEDE
Seen from Indonesia
VManiak Jilbab
Seen from Singapore
deadrose12
Seen from Indonesia
Beach on the Sex
Seen from Thailand
missmichelle
Seen from Singapore
HARUMI TERRACE
Seen from United States
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.9M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers