Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧

In the age of stupid, the writing is on the wall. 🇬🇧
The responsibility for your actions rests with you.
FSU. Reposts ≠ Endorsement. #LeaveECHR

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

The Muslim Brotherhood has opened a gateway into politics and our institutions.

Banned/Terrorist organisation in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kazakhstan, Syria, Jordan

Hamas is a Palestinian branch tied to the Brotherhood...

You'd think we'd listen.

🇬🇧 is sitting duck

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@konshtok @PositivFuturist https://t.co/9qw5KUunoS

[Miss Jo @therealmissjo]

In France there is a new activity that the Left is getting their knickers in a twist about.

Le Canon Français is running massive banquets. For about £70 you can have great food and drinks and spend time singing patriotic songs.

The “Far Left” is furious.

LFI says it has evidence of racist chanting, and of immigrant staff being insulted. With pork regularly on the menu, they say the feasts are purposely designed to exclude Muslims and vegetarians.

Meanwhile, everyday people who love France, love food and beer are having the time of their lives.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@raelbrav It really isn't about stopping Reform at all. Patriots will vote for whoever they think is the best fit for their vision.

If they align with Restore, they can't possibly vote Reform in good conscience, even if it means another Labour failure is voted into office.

[Charlie Downes @cfdownes_]

What does "restoration" mean?

It means recognising that Britain was once great, has fallen into disrepair, but can be great again if we have the will.

There is no turning back the clock - but we can take the principles that built this nation and bring them forward with us.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@cfdownes_ Perfect.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@BasilTheGreat So, DEI recruitment dealing with asylum claims? 🤔

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

I didn't renew my @reformparty_uk membership last year.

I joined @RestoreBritain this year and will be voting for them when I have the opportunity.

Restore is not Reform's vassal.

[Steve Miller @StevenJonMiller]

🚨NEW 👉If we wake up on 19th June and see Andy Burnham has won, I wonder if RESTORE BRITAIN fans will be celebrating?

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@Artemisfornow Yet again, the system is failing British people.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@Neccccy They now loathe each other.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@ThatAlexWoman Capital punishment is definitely an option for the future.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@justdavenow89 "Every single Brit...."

Lie.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@ArchRose90 It's all about the fiscal rules... for buses. 😶

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@AndrewHWestern What specifically has he said that you think is racist?

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@perayahmet Did they say they were voting for Restore?

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@elliehodges62 Because Tarquin would never approve.

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@Robbie_Reasons Yes

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@Chamaerion @implausibleblog They did, but not the ones she's thinking of...

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@arusbridger The comparison is wrong at so many levels, and yet you can't see it.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨 Well done taxpayers, you’re funding discrimination in government.

The UN’s Agenda 2030 goals of “Reduced Inequalities”, “Gender Equality” and “Leave No One Behind” are being used to justify opportunities based on identity rather than merit. You did NOT vote for this!

▪️ National Audit Office – excludes most white men from an internship.

▪️ MI5, MI6 & GCHQ – internship schemes restricted by ethnicity.

▪️ Transport for London – placements reserved for specific demographic groups.

▪️ House of Commons, House of Lords & Senedd – internships limited to BAME applicants.

▪️ Bank of England – previously ran an internship excluding white candidates.

The UN pursues equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity, where people are judged by their race, sex and background instead of their ability.

Read my book 🔥

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

@Ethno_Nat Indeed. 10,000 diverse people involved in deciding whether more diverse people can stay. What could possibly go wrong?

[Pigs & Proles 🇬🇧 @PigsandProles]

10,000 more civil servants for an "Asylum Group".

Marvellous... just what we need. 😬

Imagine lawmakers doing their job and changing the law so the UK can actually deport people.

I know. Shocking, right? 🤷‍♂️

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.

Some extracts from our report…

“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”

“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”

“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”

“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”

“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”

“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”

“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”

“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”

“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”

“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”

“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”

“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”

But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...

It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.

And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.

Funded by us, of course.

How about improving data-linking systems?

The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.

And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?

“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”

The numbers…

£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal

All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.

And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.

Want more?

At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.

Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.

Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?

Us.

And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?

The Home Office isn’t sure.

It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.

Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…

And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?

“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”

The result?

“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”

Astounding incompetence.

But there’s more good news...

The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.

In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.

This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”

“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.

I have a better idea. My own view?

Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.

And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…

And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.

It isn’t. And it never will be.

It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.

A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.

Deport them all.