@FarzaTV Incredible onbaording, stuck though cant enable voice and can't open app to learn commands etc. Cant open app to enable settings not sure if bug or not.
What “dual agency” actually means
Dual agency happens when one agent represents both sides of a transaction (most commonly in real estate, but the logic applies anywhere with negotiated interests).
In theory, it’s supposed to:
Reduce friction
Speed up the deal
Keep everyone aligned
In practice, it creates irreconcilable conflicts of interest.
Why dual agency is usually a bad idea
1. The conflict is structural, not behavioral
An agent cannot:
Advocate for the highest price and the lowest price
Push for aggressive terms and concessions
Reveal leverage to both sides without harming one
Even a well-intentioned person is forced to withhold information.
This isn’t about bad actors—it’s about impossible incentives.
2. You lose real advocacy
In dual agency, the agent becomes a process manager, not an advocate.
That means:
No strong negotiating on your behalf
No “hard truths” shared
No pushing back on the other side
If things get tense, the agent’s priority becomes:
“Don’t blow up the deal”
—not “get you the best outcome.”
3. Information asymmetry gets dangerous
Dual agents often say:
“I can’t share that due to dual agency rules.”
That’s not protecting you—that’s neutering your position.
You’re effectively negotiating blind.
4. When it fails, it feels like betrayal
This is important given what you shared earlier.
People who’ve been burned by dual agency almost always describe it as:
“I was steered”
“I wasn’t fully informed”
“They cared more about closing than me”
That emotional damage is real—and hard to undo.
When dual agency can make sense (rare cases)
There are narrow situations where it’s acceptable:
Extremely low-stakes deals
Two highly sophisticated parties
Price and terms are effectively fixed
Both sides already want the deal exactly as-is
Even then, it’s less “good” and more “tolerable.”
A better alternative (highly recommended)
Designated agency
Same brokerage
Different agents
Clear fiduciary duty on both sides
You get:
Real advocacy
Cleaner incentives
Less legal and emotional risk
Bottom line
Dual agency optimizes for closing, not for you.
If you:
Care about leverage
Want honest advice
Have been treated poorly before
Or value trust and alignment
👉 Avoid it.
If you want, tell me the context (real estate, business deal, partnership, something else), and I’ll tell you exactly how risky dual agency is in that specific situation and what structure protects you best.
here is some AI slop for you since you are informing every one to do dual agency.