So @Disney and @EpicGames have just brought Hercules to @Fortnite! Which is crazy awesome. It's a match made in Olympus!
If a half-god laying waste to armies with lightning uzis and fighting a nuclear kaiju/hydra sounds Epic, click the link for details.
https://t.co/4VDgv9s0iN
@lbrahXS Pretty sure the blur wasn't the glitch being called out, it was the way the app library quickly snapped down into place at the 7 second mark rather than already being in the same position as the front screen as it opened.
Very rarely does AI capture the visual in my mind. Often I'll see glimpses across multiple prompts and will sometimes photo bash a mood board or maybe some color reference but yeah, I don't want to compromise by accepting something that may look ok but doesn't represent my vision.
What I have seen from a lot of non-artists, is that they are willing to accept whatever looks good to them versus what they had truly envisioned for their characters. I am aware of the financial commitment and burden that writers face when needing to create visuals for their works, which is why I understand how they might accept AI as is but at the same time they'd surely balk at an artist replacing their writing with prompted works.
I think it can have its place in the creative process but I'm not interested in seeing AI drive the majority of a project's style or final output.
Say I do a daytime scene but I get a direction change to try multiple times of day, I'd consider generating alternative lighting and then head into my preferred medium to update the piece with the final selection.