PlasmaFuzer

Came for the Grok, stayed for the memes. Save the Frogs!! ∫_∂Ω{ ω } = ∫_Ω{ dω } ... z_(i+1) = z_i^2 + c

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

Strawman.

The average person isn't asking you to stop being jewish. We have an issue with a foreign state dragging us into armed conflicts that don't serve our interests.

People used to be asleep. No so much anymore.

I'm sorry for jews that catch flak in the crossfire. There are many jews, including rabbis even, who ALSO agree that many of the policies Israel pursues are damaging to jews the world over.

Perhaps the ham fisted deflections, framing all criticism as anti-semitism, is to blame? Just like calling everyone racist for observing the issues in the black community as if they don't exist.

If you tell someone they just hate jews long enough, you might jedi-mind trick them into defiantly agreeing.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

There are instances where it works. Say for instance, you have two peoole who were married, had kids, and got divorced. They both go back out dating, find each other, get married again.

I think that can work. Both parties had families, they know the score, they HOPEFULLY learned what can go right and what can go wrong.

This can absolutely work.

What is very likely NOT going to work, is a single-mom trying to use her beta orbiters as a fallback plan.

She will not respect him. She will grow to resent him. Her kid with another man will always come first.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

Depends on the circumstances. But as the OP prompted, this guy is just taking on the baggage of a women who previously wouldn't even give him the time of day.

She CLEARLY expressed she wasn't interested in the past. This makes her current intetions suspect.

This should be obvious.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@RealPostFolder Smart man. Probably won't die alone either.

He knows what we all know. He will ALWAYS be the backup plan. She's only "interested" in him as a parachute for her bad choices.

What is it women always say? If she didn't want him at his worst, she doesn't deserve him at his best.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

Thise cops should be brought up on charges and publicly tarred and feathered. They are almost equally culpable in Nowak's murder.

At a minimum they failed to provide aid in a RECKLESS DISREGARD FOR HIS LIFE!

The parents can't say it because Britain is a totalitarian police state straight out if V for Vendetta. But across the pond, we haven't given up that right yet.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@marklevinshow Because they are drawing us deeper into a foreign entanglement. The type our foundinng fathers warned us against.

You would know this if you weren't blinded by your first allegiance. The one you hold BEFORE America.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@SailorQueenJo @andrewilliamsus @tariqnasheed Ah yes. Because, "students cannot enforce rules," therefore it was perfectly legitimate to stab a kid in the heart with a knife, he shouldn't have had, over an argument.

Because a tent on a HS track provides cover from tornadoes or whatever.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@tariqnasheed Victim blaming. Pathetic.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@ItsLulu_7 Typical leftist. How do you not understand the difference between VOLUNTARY and INVOLUNTARY.

Of course you do, you're just being purposely obtuse.

[A Gene Robinson @AlBuffalo2nite]

The reason this meme resonates with me is that it captures a common tactic in public democrat debate. Someone points to a broad trend and instead of discussing whether the trend is real, the conversation immediately shifts to an exception.

Mention fatherlessness and someone brings up a successful person raised without a father. Mention failing schools and someone points to a student who excelled. Mention crime and someone finds a neighborhood that remains safe. The exception is treated as though it disproves the pattern.

The problem is that exceptions do not erase trends. Nobody is claiming every circle is red.

They will call me a outlier... An exception.... an anomaly.

The point is that when most of the circles are red, focusing exclusively on the blue one prevents an honest discussion about what the overall picture actually shows. Serious analysis begins with patterns, not exceptions.

That is why so many conversations about public democrat policy go nowhere. Instead of asking why a problem exists, people spend all their energy trying to prove the problem doesn’t exist because they found a single exception.

Reality doesn’t work that way. If most of the circles are red, then the responsible thing to do is explain why.

#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@marklevinshow Israel can do whatever it wants. What I don't understand is why we are we obligated to cosign all of their policies. Seems like our interests have diverged and it's long past due to have some healthy boundaries.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@rolandsmartin @MattWalshBlog You've overused the word and it is now meaningless.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@OwenShroyer1776 Yea that was pretty funny

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@AntiWokeMemes Has/Been

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@JasonBassler1 Cool and all, but what does this really accomplish?

But if they happen to come across a felled flock camera with a used sawzall blade conspicuously laying at the stump, "oh no, thats tewwible!"

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@DelusionPosting Good lord people are retarded nowadays. And the left likes to pretend the Dept of Ed was a good thing?

These people vote!

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

Was he under threat of grevious physical harm? If the answer is no, then using lethal force is unjustified. Hence AT A MINIMUM it's reckless indifference which is manslaughter.

However, bringing a knife onto school grounds demonstrates intent at some level. At a minimum he knows he is likely the only one who is armed.

Going into the opposing side's tent, is a provocation. Perhaps not intentional provocation, but provocation nonetheless.

He isn't entitled to be under the tent and being asked to leave and refusing solidifies the provocation. He is now intentionally staying escalating the situation further.

No one was fighting or stabbing anyone before he arrived. If he had punched Austin for allegedly shoving him, instead of murdering, I probably would be defending him. Assuming we even heard about the case that is.

But no. Instead, he pulled out a knife he WASNT supposed to have and murdered Austin for the sake of his ego. Guilty.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

Facts. You walked away because you were raised correctly.

People who aren't, who have a chip on their shoulder, who get a bruised ego and start getting all into their feelings, feeling a certain type of way, THEY are the ones that lash out and do horrible things.

Probably didn't even mean it. But the kid is dead anyways.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

@Lor_blueeyes @realAFLF Actually retarded take at the end there.

[PlasmaFuzer @PlasmaFuzer]

Fair point. So since you're hung up on the trespassing charge, how about we unredact these clearly pertinent school records to put this whole thing to bed then?

I mean you sure would have some egg on your face if you defended a pyscho who was suspended for brining a weapon to school previously. Especially if it was the same weapon he ultimately ended up using to murder someone when he returned to the school he was allegedly suspended from.

I'm sure the justice minded individuals would be glad to have this information come out. To be sure of the character of the person they defend.

Hypothetically, if the judge blocked this information from coming out for some reason, It certainly would explain why prosecutors DIDN'T included trespassing charges.

Harder to establish beyond a reasonable doubt and would distract from the core crime in the incident. Murdering someone over a shove. Total lack of proportionality.