⚕️ serpent ⚕️

( Not every repost means I support it—this account is just my notepad. )

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

No surprise, in the name of God or sector of metaphors, they isolated all forms of obstructive ideas that makes them a retarded pseudo intellectual

Greatest philosopher are hedge fund manager, detective or mostly lawyers

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

No surprise, in the name of God or sector of metaphors, they isolated all forms of obstructive ideas that makes them a retarded pseudo intellectual

Greatest philosopher are hedge fund manager, detective or mostly lawyers

[Anna K. Winters @tenshi_anna]

Okay here is the formal announcement and conceptual itinerary for my forthcoming essay due February 1st, which will be for paid subscribers to my Substack only (see my pinned post for the link). The working title is “The Rationalist Ideology & the Xenosystem of Confessional Dialectic.”

My methodology, in drawing out a response to Reza Negarestani’s polemic against @xenocosmography, will be to draw heavily on David Gray Carlson’s unique (and uniquely ambitious) psychoanalytic-diagrammatic interpretation of Hegel’s Science of Logic (as well as A. Kiarina Kordela’s critique of Wittgenstein; we shall return to this) to try to argue why Hegel effectively “reterritorializes” Kantian transcendental reason into what I will describe as an insuperable “confessional dialectic” through which Christianity neutralizes all possible opposition on the most fundamental ontological level of the concrete dialogical kenosis of “the self’s place,” as Jean-Luc Marion puts it in his reading of St. Augustine (of course there is also a Lacanian topological interpretation of this).

This “confessional dialectic” can be traced through the entire history of what became known by the time of Kant as the “ontological proof” of God’s existence, passing through the visionary medieval Scholastic work of St. Anselm of Canterbury and St. Bonaventure to its subjectively mediated radicalization at the dawn of modernity by René Descartes. I will proceed to a “deconstructive” reading of Reza Negarestani’s Intelligence & Spirit alongside Nick Land’s Xenosystems, in a sort of re-Hegelianization of Jacques Derrida’s anti-Hegelian style in Glas, showing both how Negarestani fails to be genuinely Hegelian and how Land fails to be genuinely anti-Hegelian.

I will conclude with a re-interpretation of A. Kiarina Kordela’s criminally overlooked, highly visionary text “$urplus: Spinoza, Lacan.” In this book, she quite convincingly makes the case that the theological essence of what she calls “secular capitalist modernity” inheres in the Spinozist ontological deformation of Cartesianism, in which the priority of final causality, or divine providence, is entirely suspended as a genuine philosophical methodology in favor of an overwriting of the very Godhead Himself in the naturalizing terms of Aristotelian efficient causality.

Kordela turns to Lacan in recognizing that final causality continues to be effective regardless, specifically on the level of the unconscious, complicating Spinoza’s methodological reduction. In the course of this argument, she also takes Wittgenstein to task (which implicates also all of Sellarsianism through to Negarestani) for confusing, in his distinction of causes and reasons, the genuine register of the interpretation of the allegedly “imaginary” effect of forms of finality in the constitution of the subject with an inert cultural horizon in which a formalization of justificatory “reasons” for behavior (always ex post facto, unlike final causes) parallels a similarly ego-projective account of ontological “causes” on precisely this model of fictional ex post facto subjective rationality.

In precisely this way, Sellars’ Wittgensteinian scientific realism entirely falls to Quentin Meillassoux’s critique of “correlationism” in After Finitude. I will argue that the only thing that doesn’t is, in fact, the ontological principle formalized in Roman Catholic thought as the “analogia entis,” which exists as a systematic apophatic technique of qualification over all univocal terms of rational explanation which would reduce the divine “outside” to a conceptually graspable idol.

It’s high time for the speculative frontiers of contemporary continental philosophy, stumbling blindly in nihilistic confusion, to confront the radical “Catholicity of Reason” which they have wrongly scorned. To quote @Grimezsz in “Artificial Angels”: this is what it feels like to be hunted by something smarter than you.”

https://t.co/jUJMKJrNBH

[Actaeon Press @SchattigeDer]

"This word finance is a slave word; it is unknown in the City."
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau

[Uchē @Retouchevisuals]

Throwback to when Cristiano Ronaldo
Live steamed himself naked

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

Both carry the same meaning..
If you look more deeply

[Alexander 𖤓 Nietzschean Vitalist @UbermenschMind]

Sensitive young men will rule the world again

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

This is a very bleak form of understanding spirituality ...

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

To get this vedic one is pretty rare to be honest

[DKAstrology 🇭🇺🇯🇲🙏✨ @DKAstrology]

Literally.
Word by word🤣🥴

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

Ecological condition is not great

[Aishwarya @AishwaryaBaddie]

We all know the potential of indian men ✨️

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

Kinetic ai

[Opera Neon @opera_neon_]

Most AI users still don't have a proper workflow.

They open ChatGPT, get an answer. Open Claude, ask something else. Repeat across 4 tools.

Here's how a multi-model workflow actually works.

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

47

[Nornal Guy 🧙‍♂️ @theralkia]

Most difficult numerology life path number?

[Nornal Guy 🧙‍♂️ @theralkia]

Most difficult numerology life path number?

[Thomas OSullivan @OsullivanThomas]

@Pulcys Starring in the digital native version of Ash Wednesday.

[Abacus.AI @abacusai]

ChatLLM - Use The Best AI For Your Use Case

Front-end coding - Opus 4.7
Back-end coding - GPT 5.5 xHigh
Visual understanding- Flash 3.5
Cheap - DeepSeek Flash
Video - Seedance 2.0
Image - GPT Image-2.0
Voice - Flash Live
Writing - Gemini 3.1 Pro
Real Time - Grok 4.3

ALL IN ONE PLACE

[indic mawnteé @indicmawntee]

all that ass-licking done by ASIANS (Koreans / Japanese) of WHlTE people still ends up in them facing so many racist attacks by WHlTES 🥀

here this woman got harassed so much by some WHlTE boys that she was literally crying while filming them

[𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 🌞ॐ࿗ @rian_vlbt]

Funny enough, Indian philosophy anticipated a remarkably contemporary epistemological debate. Several classical Indian schools defended the view that truth is the natural condition of cognition, whereas error requires the intervention of some specific defect (doṣa) whether a malfunction of the sense faculties (indriyadoṣa), a failure of memory (smṛti), or some other distorting factor. The classic formulation of this position is the svataḥ-prāmāṇyavāda (the doctrine of the intrinsic validity of cognition) developed by the Pūrva-Mīmāṃsā tradition.

What is particularly striking is how widely influential this intuition became. Abhinavagupta, for instance, broadly accepts the same underlying principle, even while reinterpreting it through the lens of Trika Śaivism and an absolute idealist metaphysics rather than the realist framework of the Bhāṭṭa Mīmāṃsakas. More generally, much of the Indian literature on error (khyātivāda) operates within this assumption that cognition is prima facie trustworthy and that falsity requires a special explanatory burden.

For all practical purposes, this resembles a family of positions that both modern and contemporary analytic epistemologists have been attempting to articulate through different conceptual frameworks in recent years. One finds echoes of it in Michael Huemer's Phenomenal Conservatism, according to which appearances confer immediate justification unless defeated; in John Bengson's work on quasi-perceptual justification and intellectual seemings; in Thomas Reid's doctrine of common sense and the default trustworthiness of our faculties; in William Alston's epistemology of doxastic practices; and even, in a more modest form, in contemporary anti-skeptical positions that assign a defeasible but intrinsic justificatory status to ordinary cognition.

The convergence is fascinating itself: centuries before the emergence of analytic epistemology, Indian philosophers were already asking whether cognition is innocent until proven guilty - or guilty until proven innocent.

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

@SHIGOW__SAN @soulrambler_ Aesthetics does matter but what you said is true

It carries the weight

[⚕️ serpent ⚕️ @PlatipusRound]

@FidelCacheFlow @clippedszn It does not matter.

To be honest Miami is the worst spot to get most procedures. Beverly Hills is likewise overvalued. Oregon has one of the top facial surgeons, which most people don't know about... That feels like coping, but it's not