One Wireless Place

Smart Watch Mobile Video via One Wireless Place. Print; Radio; TV; PC; Cellular; #SocialMoney #5G Mobile; #IoT; #EHR #Ai Cloud #ADUNA API is revolutionary

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@realDonaldTrump Best President. Ever!

#DACA

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

$mmtlp
@directorpulte @annvandersteele
A vote for team Citadel-ByronDonalds is against retail shareholders and #MMTLP #GNS #MMAT

https://t.co/ckitElHAJF

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

https://t.co/ulQbQo97V1

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@TheBillionaireU $MMTLP Should the mmtlparmy express its collective opinion on the suitability of Ralph Norman attempt to replace the late Senator Graham, South Carolina

[Texas 🇺🇸 @MustangMan_TX]

Oh my word! I laughed way too hard! 🤣🤣🤣

This is just brilliant!

Any tweaks you would make?
I love that Trump is number 45/47! 😆

[WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️ @WWG1WGA_QQ]

🚨 OMG. A MASSIVE India H-1B visa fraud ring has just been busted...nearly 90% PERCENT of India's visa applications contain FRAUDULENT INFORMATION

100,000 THOUSAND counterfeit certificates have been seized 🤯

"Law enforcement in India claim it has uncovered a network of universities that produce fake degrees which were possibly used to obtain these high skilled H1B visas, including one school which allegedly stole over 36,000 fake degrees. It cost as little as $1,400 for one of those."

"And while these are supposed to be high skilled employees during almost all of Biden's time in office, 83% got junior or entry level positions."

This is INSANE! SHUT DOWN THE H-1B SCAM!

@KenPaxtonTX is now going after this in Texas 🔥

@kayleighmcenany @SatAmericaFNC

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass busybrands is an event planner, not political strategist. Kurtis ought to be the designated media spokesperson.
Each FOIA has the potential to save our investment.

[Stealth Medical @StealthMedical1]

This is from Chanel 12 News. If Israel didn’t see it the. Israel doesn’t need to follow them.

Canadas carney was given the MOU to review, Israel still hasn’t reviewed it.

In fact, new reporting says all members of the G7 saw the document.

----
Join the Open Source feed 👇
https://t.co/mq9WLwcagn

[David Albright @DAVIDHALBRIGHT1]

Only one main paragraph on nuclear in the MOU text that is circulating and has been published by both Bloomberg and CNN. These versions agree on a very dangerous, leaky opening sentence, “Iran reiterates that it will never produce nuclear weapons.” This commitment is incomplete from normal standards and experience, since it has giant loopholes that could allow an ever devious Iranian regime to continue working on developing nuclear weapons and building components, while insisting it is not producing nuclear weapons.

Perhaps, there is more, either in a newer version or a secret side deal. But at face value, this sentence needs serious amendment. It should immediately be changed to “never develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess nuclear weapons.“

This language would also include a ban on buying a nuclear weapon, something which Trump reportedly has pushed for, and as reported to be there in some German media.

The rest of the paragraph does not provide confidence that robust IAEA inspections will be established that allow the inspectors to verify the end of Iran’s nuclear weapon program, albeit greatly reduced in size and scope by the two wars. Iran has never agreed to the level of needed access to military sites and personnel. That is why the IAEA Board has found Iran in non-compliance with its obligations. So, does the phraseology of the rest of the paragraph, promising to address “all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues” exclude this highly contentious issue from further negotiations?

As a result, “mutually agreed” should be dropped from the paragraph, since the issues are well defined by UN Security Council Resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and IAEA safeguards reports. 

Full paragraph in MOU we have:
“The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates that it will never produce nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States have agreed that the fate of enriched material and the fate of all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues, including Iran’s nuclear needs, will be adequately addressed in a final agreement; the final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article.”

A second paragraph of the MOU mentions nuclear.  Reportedly, "The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States agree that, pending a final agreement, they will maintain the status quo: Iran will maintain the status quo on its nuclear program, and the United States will not impose new sanctions on Iran or strengthen its forces in the region."  What is the status quo of Iran's program, given it has undeclared nuclear material it refuses to admit to and has worked on nuclear weapons? Moreover, who will verify it?

[Stealth Medical @StealthMedical1]

The administration needs to adress this immediately

@SebGorka @Doranimated @JDVance @jaredkushner @SteveWitkoff

Only one main paragraph on nuclear in the MOU text that is circulating and has been published by both Bloomberg and CNN. These versions agree on a very dangerous, leaky opening sentence, “Iran reiterates that it will never produce nuclear weapons.” This commitment is incomplete from normal standards and experience, since it has giant loopholes that could allow an ever devious Iranian regime to continue working on developing nuclear weapons and building components, while insisting it is not producing nuclear weapons.

Perhaps, there is more, either in a newer version or a secret side deal. But at face value, this sentence needs serious amendment. It should immediately be changed to “never develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess nuclear weapons.“

This language would also include a ban on buying a nuclear weapon, something which Trump reportedly has pushed for, and as reported to be there in some German media.

The rest of the paragraph does not provide confidence that robust IAEA inspections will be established that allow the inspectors to verify the end of Iran’s nuclear weapon program, albeit greatly reduced in size and scope by the two wars. Iran has never agreed to the level of needed access to military sites and personnel. That is why the IAEA Board has found Iran in non-compliance with its obligations. So, does the phraseology of the rest of the paragraph, promising to address “all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues” exclude this highly contentious issue from further negotiations?

As a result, “mutually agreed” should be dropped from the paragraph, since the issues are well defined by UN Security Council Resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and IAEA safeguards reports. 

Full paragraph in MOU we have:
“The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates that it will never produce nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States have agreed that the fate of enriched material and the fate of all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues, including Iran’s nuclear needs, will be adequately addressed in a final agreement; the final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article.”

A second paragraph of the MOU mentions nuclear.  Reportedly, "The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States agree that, pending a final agreement, they will maintain the status quo: Iran will maintain the status quo on its nuclear program, and the United States will not impose new sanctions on Iran or strengthen its forces in the region."  What is the status quo of Iran's program, given it has undeclared nuclear material it refuses to admit to and has worked on nuclear weapons? Moreover, who will verify it?

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass GG, not a word on @Greenhills303 performance?IMHO both Spears and Traudt were agile as both admirably responded as the Judge deliberately changed topics

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass John Brda sold at $10. A tout. Officer of Corp. Shareholder's held the fort.

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass
4500 is thereabout GG
#MMTLP

FBR party too (2)

SBF - ‘serve’ 2.5 yrs on @DOGE files ?

#mmtlp #pulte #clayton #sec

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass Whois our lead in Maine?
Is Susan Collins a signatory

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

$MMTLP former SEC Chair, highly respected Jay Clayton, ought to be willing to fully address national security questioning during his senate confirmation process. #MMTLPfraud #MMTLParmy

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@marcorubio Next President of USA
trusted, experienced, vetted, pragmatic, humanitarian

Secretary Marco Rubio Remarks at Munich Security Conference - YouTube

#mmtlp

[Champion-NBH @ChampionNBH]

Our Gov't gets it. The country needs to operate in the benefit to those that built it ..not the Parasites. Blood sucking leaches...deport them.

[ArtBurn @ArtburnDesigns]

🚨 NEW SEC FOIA RESPONSE 🚨
FOIA 26-00651-FOIA

This one matters.

This FOIA requested records showing communications/referrals between SEC Corporation Finance and SEC Trading & Markets regarding Next Bridge Hydrocarbons’ S-1 activity.

The response shows something important:

Once FIF entered the discussion, the tone and substance appear to shift.

Before FIF:
SEC / NBH S-1 communications were largely about registration mechanics, eligibility, disclosure, and process.

After FIF steps in:
The discussion turns to operational market-structure concerns:

• shares on loan
• lending broker-dealers unable to recover shares
• customer protections under SEC Rule 15c3-3
• IRA/tax consequences
• transfer-agent capacity
• whether shareholders should be forced out of bank/broker/nominee holding

One FIF point is especially hard to ignore:

“Because of the prior FINRA trading halt, there are shares on loan that lending broker-dealers cannot recover.”

That is not retail speculation.

That is an industry group raising operational concerns to the SEC about the Next Bridge S-1 process.

And FIF’s recommendation?

Do not force participating customers out of bank, broker-dealer, or nominee custody — because preserving that structure would allow for “future reconciliation of outstanding stock loans.”

Read that again.

Future reconciliation of outstanding stock loans.

This FOIA does not prove every theory.

But it does prove the S-1 issue was not just routine paperwork.

It involved broker-held shares, loaned shares, customer protections, transfer mechanics, and reconciliation concerns.

That is exactly why MMTLP shareholders have been asking questions for years.

#MMTLP #MMAT #NextBridge #FOIA #SEC #FINRA

[Michael A.M.E. @MindandEmotion7]

https://t.co/HqL42espCH

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass the most significant FOIA response was the April 2023 sent to Howard. My initial thought was; Aprils fool ?

[One Wireless Place @PokePlay]

@Giftsonglass how about a billboard-sized ad campaign at the May 6th , Stewart FL event.
Somebody have the event marketing or coordinator contacts?