🚨 BREAKING: BOMBSHELL Minnesota auditor report just dropped and it confirms Tim Walz's Department of Human Services FABRICATED RECORDS and did not verify grant recipients, tried COVERING THEIR TRACKS, enabling massive fraud
It just got 10,000X worse. WALZ MUST RESIGN.
"Perhaps the most EXPLOSIVE revelation is that managers within DHS tried to cover their tracks by backdating and creating NEW DOCUMENTS." 🤯
"Sent millions of dollars out the door in grants without making proper checks into who was receiving them. And that is not even the most jaw-dropping finding!"
"One outrageous example, the auditors found a grantee that was paid $672,000 for one month of work WITHOUT ANY INFO on what they do!"
"And the audit says the grant manager who paid it then left DHS a couple days later and became a paid consultant for that company!"
"TO ME, THAT'S CRIMINAL."
"During the audit multiple DHS managers backdated or created new documents to try to cover their tracks."
WOW. THIS IS BAD.
BAM!! 💯💯💯
Wat Alice Weidel hier zegt geldt ook voor B,NL en andere EU lidstaten. Deel maximaal. Draag de boodschap uit. Voor onze toekomst en deze van onze kinderen.
Horrifying...
Michelle Worton was a nationally recognized dental professional. She sat on the College of Dental Hygienists in BC. She took the COVID shots because she was mandated to as a regulated healthcare professional.
Within an hour of dose 1: racing heart, erratic blood pressure, chest tightness.
Within 48 hours of dose 2: severe neurological onset - double vision, tunnel vision, tinnitus, incontinence, dizziness, inability to regulate temperature.
Her first doctor blamed it on menopause.
Since then:
→ 8+ white matter brain lesions
→ Cystic masses in her liver, pancreas, cervix, breasts, and BRAIN
→ A brain cyst so large it was compressing her skull - Canada wouldn't operate
→ She sold her dental practice, drained savings, crowdfunded $148K USD for private brain surgery in the US
→ Over $300K spent on medical care to date
→ Denied plasmapheresis in Canada in July
→ Told to hide her vaccine injury to even get a referral accepted
→ Stroke discovered in 2024 - never told
→ Spends 90% of her time in bed
→ Her children became her caregivers
→ She does not know how long she will live
She was told the shots were safe and effective. She was coerced. Coercion is not consent. And when she was injured, she was abandoned, gaslit, mocked, and censored.
Millions took the shot because they were mandated - to keep their jobs, their licenses, their livelihoods. Millions more took it because they believed the mantra: "safe and effective."
They did what society told them to do. To abandon them when they're injured is a betrayal. To gaslight them, dismiss them, and deny them care is morally wrong. You don't get to mandate something and then pretend the casualties don't exist.
Michelle Worton deserves care. Every vaccine-injured person deserves care. "No one left behind" was the promise. It was a lie.
Nous en sommes EXACTEMENT LÀ... 🤬🤬🤬
"La prophétie la plus troublante de toutes"
Il y a 70 ans, une vision fut gravée dans les mots, décrivant avec une effrayante précision ce que nous vivons aujourd’hui.
Le 2 février 1905, à Saint-Pétersbourg, naissait une âme qui allait marquer la pensée et les lettres : Alissa Zinovievna Rosenbaum, plus connue sous le nom d’Ayn Rand. Philosophe et écrivaine américaine d’origine russe, elle laissa derrière elle des mots qui résonnent encore, comme un écho prophétique dans les tumultes de notre époque.
Elle écrivit ces paroles :
« Lorsque vous réalisez que, pour produire, vous devez obtenir l’autorisation de ceux qui ne produisent rien… Lorsque vous voyez l’argent couler non pas vers ceux qui créent des biens, mais vers ceux qui trafiquent en faveurs… Lorsque vous comprenez que certains s’enrichissent davantage par la corruption et l’influence que par le labeur, et que les lois ne vous protègent plus d’eux mais, au contraire, les protègent contre vous… Lorsque vous découvrez que la corruption est récompensée tandis que l’honnêteté devient un sacrifice, alors vous saurez, sans le moindre doute, que votre société est condamnée. »
Un avertissement gravé dans le marbre de la pensée, un miroir tendu à un monde vacillant.
Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet
Sept 20\26
My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering.
I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering.
The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM)
I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure
The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options).
The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield.
The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity.
The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM).
II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122)
Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person.
The Evidence:
Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5).
The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public.
Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard.
III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121)
This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings.
The Strategy:
We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm.
IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element)
To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity.
The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO).
The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship."
Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield).
Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office.
V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea)
The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below:
Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind."
The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes.
This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket."
CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada)
TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
DATE: February 13, 2026
I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION
This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034.
The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure.
Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay.
Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition).
III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA)
COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122)
The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings.
Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest.
COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c))
The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada.
Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject.
IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP
To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders:
Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals.
Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen.
Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements.
V. CONCLUSION
The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold.
I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026.
In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings.
The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis
Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals)
These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions.
The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status.
Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return).
The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts.
Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals)
This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office.
The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF.
Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push.
Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals)
A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program.
Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario.
The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities.
Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals
If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless.
Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals.
If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following;
1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post.
2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP.
3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement.
4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.
For all the sunshine patriots quick to find fault and impatiently sitting on the sidelines, shut up and pass the ammunition. Or better yet, get into the fight yourself.
@smith_john86285@realDonaldTrump Imagine that. Even Obama. The whites are the majority population in the United States. I’m not white and see no issue so why don’t you get over it? CRT much?
The missing links of the pre pandemic decade behind the development of mRNA “vaccine” encoding for the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
https://t.co/XBFKXbN1Nt
🚨 UPDATE: In May, the Gates Foundation and Anthropic launched a $200M partnership covering global health and life sciences.
On Sept 17, Anthropic loosened its safeguards for biology work.
On Sept 18, Reuters revealed it quietly built a physical biology lab. It won't say what it's for.
Three dates. Four months. One company.
MAY 14, 2026 — Anthropic and the Gates Foundation announce a four-year, $200 million partnership. The Gates Foundation grants funds. Anthropic contributes Claude usage credits and staff support. The stated scope: global health, life sciences, education, economic mobility.
SEPT 17, 2026 — Anthropic introduces the Life Sciences Verification Program. Verified life-science professionals get access to its Mythos, Opus, and Sonnet models under what Anthropic's own announcement calls "a refined set of safeguards MORE PERMISSIVE for biology-related work." It is the first time Mythos has been opened this way.
SEPT 18, 2026 — Reuters reports Anthropic has quietly built a wet lab — a facility for physical biological experiments. Its head of life sciences, Eric Kauderer-Abrams, confirms it on the record: "We believe that to do biology, the final test is still and will be for a while in real lab work."
Then a spokesperson told Reuters the lab is "not for drug discovery specifically" — and declined to elaborate.
Read that again. The company confirmed the lab exists, then declined to say what it does, offering only what it isn't.
One person familiar with the work told Reuters that Anthropic wants Claude to "direct robotic units to carry out science experiments with limited human intervention." Anthropic's spokesperson says human oversight remains essential for safety. Both statements are in the same article.
Here is why this matters.
The entire regulatory case being built right now — the Sanders bill, the UK superintelligence bill, the closed Senate briefings — rests on the premise that frontier AI could help someone engineer a pathogen. That is the load-bearing argument. It is why safeguards on biology exist in the first place.
On September 17, the company that has done more than any other to advance that argument made its biology safeguards more permissive.
On September 18, we learned it had built a lab to do physical biology.
Safeguards for you. A wet lab for them.
This is the pattern I documented in my investigation of the Gates AI paradox: the same capital advances the capability and funds the alarm about the capability, and the rules that follow land on everyone except the people who wrote them.
I did not expect the next data point to arrive within twenty-four hours.
WHAT I AM NOT CLAIMING: I am not claiming the Gates Foundation funded this laboratory. The May partnership commits funds to programs implemented with outside partners, not to Anthropic's internal facilities. I am not claiming Anthropic is developing biological weapons, or that its lab is unlawful, or that anyone coordinated these three announcements. Every fact above is on the record and linked below.
What I am claiming is that a company whose public safety argument centers on biological risk quietly built a biology lab, loosened its biology restrictions the day before that became public, and will not say what the lab is for.
That is not a conspiracy theory. That is a press release, an announcement page, and a Reuters interview.
My investigation into who funds both sides of the AI safety debate below.
RFK Jr. is sounding the alarm on what he calls the greatest urgency in the world: the autism epidemic.
The numbers:
In 1970, the biggest epidemiological study at the time looked at 900,000 kids in Wisconsin. Researchers knew exactly what autism looked like and what they were looking for. The result? An incidence rate of 0.8 per 10,000 - less than 1 in 10,000.
Today, according to his agency, it's 1 in every 31 kids. In California, 1 in 19. Among boys, 1 in 12.5.
This is not just better diagnosis:
The industry talking point for years has been "we're just noticing it more." RFK Jr. rejects that. He was raised in the movement for rights for people with intellectual disabilities, working at Camp Shriver (which became Special Olympics) from age 8, and at Wassaic State School in high school. He never saw anyone with full-blown autism.
He points out that people his age - 70-year-old men - do not have profound autism. Non-verbal, non-toilet trained, stimming, toe walking, head banging. He's never seen it in his generation. But we see it in kids every day.
The epidemic is real:
Peer-reviewed studies confirm it. One commissioned by the California State Legislature and led by Irva Hertz-Picciotto at UC Davis MIND Institute — all of them say the epidemic is real. You don't even need the science. Common sense tells you.
The 1989 red line:
Congress asked the EPA in 2009 to identify when the epidemic began. In 2010, EPA scientists published a study pointing to a red line: 1989. Something happened. They recommended government agencies drop everything and investigate.
RFK Jr.'s logic: Genes do not cause epidemics. They may provide vulnerability. You need an environmental toxin - something that became ubiquitous around 1989 and the early 90s across all demographics, from Cubans in Key Biscayne to Inuit in Alaska. That list is finite. It's easy science. Identify the culprits and eliminate them.
Why it hasn't been done:
It was a taboo. You weren't allowed to study it. Scientists who did couldn't publish. When publications slipped by the gatekeepers, they were retracted. His agency wouldn't fund the studies.
No sacred cows:
Everything must be looked at. Especially vaccines. Especially after Poul Thorsen, the lead researcher on the Danish vaccine-autism studies, was proven to be a fraud. The gatekeepers buried this. That ends now.
🚨 BREAKING: Michele Tafoya just dropped a new ad calling out Peggy Flanagan for allowing fraudsters to steal hundreds of millions.
Not a single person was fired over it, and now she wants a promotion?
Vote Michele Tafoya!
The Greenland resolution is the best outcome for United States.
The Greenland drama ended the only way it should have ended. Greenland keeps its internal life. Denmark keeps the flag and the legal shell. The United States keeps, and now hardens, the one thing that actually mattered: exclusive security rights on the island that sits between North America and the Arctic approaches.
Permanent access. Bases. Overflight. A veto on Chinese and Russian bases and “sensitive” investment. No transfer of sovereignty. No cartoon annexation. A 1951 Cold War arrangement dragged into the present and locked so it survives even if Greenland someday becomes independent from Denmark.
That is not a humiliation of Greenlanders. It is the adult version of what they and Copenhagen said was available from the start. Thule air base did not become Pituffik space base because United States needed a souvenir. It became an advanced base because the North Atlantic and the GIUK gap do not care about press conferences.
The United States once staffed a real presence there, then treated the collapse of the USSR like a permission slip to go home. China and Russia noticed. Mineral maps and dual-use ports are not folklore and the error was not wanting Greenland in the Western security system. The error was pretending 1991 canceled geography. Russian threat never went away.
The ugly part was the theater. Threatening the sovereignty of a NATO ally is not strength. It is a gift to every European who wants to call America a predator instead of a patron. Stephen Miller and that whole annexation carnival overstepped. It made the United States look like it was shaking down Denmark for a colony. That is bad strategy and worse optics. Alliances rot when the junior partner has to explain to its own public why Washington sounds like a landlord with a gun.
Trump still closed it the way he often closes Republican messes: take the maximal noise, then settle on the instrument that actually works. He did not need the title deed. He needed a pact with no expiry date, Greenland in the room as a party, and language that keeps adversaries off the land.
Denmark and Greenland can say sovereignty and self-determination without lying. United States can start building without inventing a new war. That is the WWII-to-Cold-War policy restored, not abandoned because a flag changed in Moscow.
Greenland stays Greenland. America stays on the ridge line. The people who wanted a purchase ceremony can sit down. The map did not change. The security architecture did, and that was the only part worth the fight. God bless America. 🇺🇸
🚨 WE ARE WATCHING AN EXTRAORDINARY PSYCHOLOGICAL BATTLE OVER PERCEPTION.
Turn on the media and you'd think EVERYTHING is dramatically worse under President Trump.
Then look at the numbers.
Compared with the same stage of Biden's presidency, the figures being circulated show:
INFLATION
🟦 Biden: +12.3%
🟥 Trump: +4.3%
GROCERIES
🟦 Biden: +15.8%
🟥 Trump: +3.3%
GAS
🟦 Biden: +69%
🟥 Trump: +12%
RENT
🟦 Biden: +7.7%
🟥 Trump: +4.5%
ELECTRICITY
🟦 Biden: +19.1%
🟥 Trump: +8.4%
NEW & USED CARS
🟦 Biden: +23.9%
🟥 Trump: −1.2%
That doesn't mean Americans aren't feeling real affordability pressure. They ARE.
But during Biden's term, I REMEMBER the media making it feel like everything was fine but the opposite was felt by Americans in the real world.
Today, it seems to be the opposite. People's conditions are improving but the perception is that life is worse.
That's exactly why you have to separate how people feel, what they're being told, and what the underlying data actually show.
We're heading toward the 2026 midterms.
QUESTION EVERYTHING. CHECK THE NUMBERS YOURSELF. 🇺🇸
In a stunning political move, the chief judge of the Minneapolis federal bench disclosed the behind the scenes collaboration between all judges to thwart legal proceedings related to immigration cases this year.
Patrick Schiltz, who admitted his longtime involvement in a pro-migrant nonprofit, reveals how judges remained on their cell phones nonstop to halt deportation proceedings. And rather than evaluate each case individually—as is required—the judges developed pro forma orders (as I predicted) to immediately stop cases in their tracks.
This is something:
Schiltz: “Some judges built templates of legal orders so they could respond quickly to some of the detention issues that were arising again and again.”
Why Greenland and Trumps Greenland deal is so important
-Arctic sealanes
-Golden dome
-Critical resources like rare earth minerals
◾️on the map you can see the retreating icecap has opened shippinglanes for periods of the year. Greenland offers a place to monitor and restrict Russian and Chinese naval and submarine movements through the strategic North Atlantic sea corridor (known as the GIUK gap). And it complements Alaska to exert strategic control of the Arctic waters.
◾️The map also shows why Greenland is crucial for Trumps golden dome project, Us missile shield.
▶️Polar Flight Path: Sits directly under the shortest trajectory incoming missiles would take over the North Pole to hit the U.S.
▶️Safe Interception: Allows intercepting missiles in space so toxic debris falls over Arctic ice instead of American cities.
▶️Satellite Tracking Hub: Offers frequent, direct communication with polar-orbiting satellites tracking incoming threats.
▶️Perfect Laser Conditions: Features cold, dry, ultra-clear air that optimizes advanced laser and sensor tracking.
▶️Existing Radar Base: Leverages the Pituffik Space Base to feed early-warning radar data straight into the defense shield.
◾️Greenland holds some of the world's largest untapped reserves of rare earth minerals, including critical metals like lithium, titanium, cobalt, and nickel.These minerals are vital for advanced electronics, electric vehicle batteries, and defense technology. Acquiring influence over these reserves reduces U.S. reliance on China, which currently dominates the global supply chain.
This historic deal is a huge win for the United States and the American people. Thanks to President Trump’s vision and leadership, this historic agreement permanently guarantees U.S. security interests in the Arctic at zero cost to the U.S. taxpayer.
Greenland will forever be part of the strategic defense area of North America and exclude any adversary from it and the surrounding area.
This deal permanently and completely addresses our national security concerns in Greenland.
NEW DATA: COVID VACCINE INJURY US MILITARY
"I am currently tasked with investigating the 55,000 vaccine adverse event reports filed on individuals identified as members of the U.S. Armed Forces, this includes 2544 deaths."
"I had one servicemember die of rapid onset and progression of esophageal cancer after COVID vaccination and one in which a student pilot who had never been COVID positive, who experienced sudden cardiac death at the controls of a helicopter during a training flight."
"I have first hand knowledge of over 29 deaths of service members after vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccines."
"While establishing definitive causation in every case is complex, the existence of these safety signals, combined with known risks such as myocarditis in young males, means that claims of vaccine-related harm cannot be dismissed as having no medical basis."
July 2026 Affidavit, Theresa M. Long
M.D., LTC, U.S. ARMY MEDICAL CORPS
Senior Medical Military Advisor to the HHS Secretary
The affidavit was filed as part of an 80 page motion seeking summary judgment in long standing litigation over claims about COVID vaccinations and vaccine injury in the US military.
Long's testimony in support @IvanRaiklin is part of a defamation lawsuit brought by Dr. Terry Adirim who had been a senior Pentagon health official advising on the COVID mandate.
Critics call the claims "dubious" and "unsubstantiated."
Researchers gave office workers who lived under LEDs a 60W incandescent desk lamp. Two weeks later, every one of them had their color vision improve by 25%.
The government banned those bulbs in 2022 for "wasting" energy as infrared.
But that "waste" is actually one of the most important nutrients our bodies depend upon, and the improvement lasted for weeks after the lamps were taken away (while nothing changed in the controls).
Decades of forgotten research show the artificial light we replaced it with is a root cause of many inexplicable illnesses (e.g., insomnia, obesity, cancer, and hyperactivity in children). Here I show what that research found and how a bill now before the Senate can bring these bulbs back.🧵 https://t.co/lyYVvZrtnS
Shocking...
Dr. James Thorp, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist and former OBGYN board examiner, dropped testimony that should be headline news everywhere.
Here is what he revealed:
1. The Data Manipulation
Canada and US databases counted COVID vaccine injuries and deaths as "unvaccinated" for 2-3 weeks after the jab. Those killed or injured by the vaccine were erased from the statistics.
2. Pfizer 5.3.6 Data (Legally Mandated)
• 42,086 casualties in just 70 days
• 1,223 dead
• 25% died on day one
• Injured-to-killed ratio: 33.4 (wars are less than 10)
• They cut the data off at 70 days instead of the required 90
• They tried to hide this for 75 years
3. Miscarriage Data
• Pfizer 5.3.6: 81% miscarriage rate
• Shimabukuro raw data: 82%
• Dr. Naomi Wolf (independent): 82%
• The NEJM study was "ghostwritten" and diluted the denominator by including 700 women who got the shot after 28 weeks (when miscarriage is impossible). Real rate: 82%.
4. The NEJM Money Trail
The US government paid the New England Journal of Medicine $426,000. Rochelle Walensky (who had never practiced OBGYN) was invited to write an op-ed pushing the vaccine on pregnant women. Dr. Thorp: "This is an abomination of truth."
5. "Long COVID" is a Masquerade
MIT study on v-safe data (10 million people):
• 1.87% had significant symptoms 3+ months post-vaccination
• That's 630,000 Canadians and 5 million Americans with vaccine injury, not "Long COVID"
• Dr. Thorp: "90% of Long COVID is vaccine injury."
6. The Threat to Doctors
The American Board of OBGYN sent a letter to 62,000 doctors: Follow the protocol or lose your license. Dr. Thorp responded with a 98-page letter citing 1,019 peer-reviewed studies showing injuries.
7. The Pregnancy Safety Signals
• 1,200-fold increase in menstrual irregularities
• 271-fold increase in miscarriage vs. flu vaccine
• 22 stillbirths in Fresno (statistically impossible)
• 13 stillbirths in 24 hours at Lionsgate Hospital, BC
• Fetal malformations significantly increased
8. The Suppressed Research
Dr. Thorp: "We are looking at the effect of the vaccine on ovarian reserve... IRB approved, no funding. Nobody wants to fund this."
Turkish study: 60% of primary ovarian follicles killed in rodents.
Czech Republic: 30% reduction in birth rates.
9. They Knew
January 25, 2021 emails. Fauci's diary. Andrew Weissman (Nobel laureate) emailed Fauci about animal data showing safety signals in amniotic fluid. Fauci buried it.
Dr. Thorp's conclusion:
"They lied. They hid the safety signals. We have the receipts. We know where the bones are buried."
This is testimony under oath.