The enlightenment happened to empirically quantify and find God. Along the way humans forgot what they were proving and made the journey of probing for God their god.
@skdh I am excited to listen!
I have a question if I may, I’m a physics outsider wanting to publish a paper in physics. What do you recommend I do. Any advice would be greatly appreciated 🙏
@HK61ttv@pixelprayer A warg just ate my main colonist because of famine 🤦♂️ now my colony is cascading into ruin 🤣 I have 1k hours and still have surprises happening all the time
Working on a prayer app! this was all created with Grok build from terminal then ran from cursor. Grok nailed the them and aesthetic. We haven't finished yet a lot of the buttons don't work yet but this was built in an hour of back and fourth. It could have gone faster but I was thinking about what the application should look and feel like. This is a passion project
Working on a prayer app! this was all created with Grok build from terminal then ran from cursor. Grok nailed the them and aesthetic. We haven't finished yet a lot of the buttons don't work yet but this was built in an hour of back and fourth. It could have gone faster but I was thinking about what the application should look and feel like. This is a passion project
Eric, I believe I have something here. I’ve been working for the last couple years using A.I. to help me perform calculations. But I want to give you an excerpt from my most recent chat with Claude and Grok about my paper. @ericweinstein
Strong Geometric Unity:
Derivation of the Standard Model and Einstein Gravity from the 32-State Horizontal Spinor Space of Spin(7,7)
Version 97— Working Draft, May 2026
Synthesis: What the Framework Claims and at What Confidence
The framework is built on a 14-dimensional manifold Y with structure group Spin(7,7) and orthogonal chimeric splitting TY ≅ C_horiz⁴ ⊕ C_vert¹⁰, where the vertical fiber has signature (6,4). At Level 1, pure representation theory forces: (i) the Pati–Salam gauge group SU(4) × SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R as the maximal compact subgroup of Spin(6,4); (ii) three colors from the 4-dimensional Weyl spinors of the SO(6) sector (2^{6/2} = 4, breaking to SU(3)_c); (iii) two weak isospins from the 2-dimensional Weyl spinors of the SO(4) sector; (iv) the Higgs doublet quantum numbers (1,2,+½) inside the (0,4) fiber sector; (v) one generation of 16 Weyl fermions with all Standard Model quantum numbers under Y = ½(B−L) + T³_R; (vi) anomaly cancellation within each generation; and (vii) the existence of proton decay from the Pati–Salam X/Y bosons. The gauge coupling ratio C = 4/3 follows from the Rarita–Schwinger embedding.
At Level 2, the topology of dP₃ together with the Atiyah–Singer index theorem applied to the lepton locus bundle L = 3H − 2E₁ − 2E₂ − 2E₃ gives ind(D_L) = 3 (three generations) both analytically and topologically (three S₃-stable exceptional curves). The natural Higgs bundle 𝒪(E₁ + E₂ + E₃) gives χ = 1 (one light Higgs doublet), while its conjugate gives χ = −2 (no light mirror Higgs). Generation-independent Yukawa couplings for both leptons and the Higgs follow from S₃-equivariance of the bundles.
The moduli t₁ > t₂ > t₃ (semi-derived from the torsion potential) produce a rank-1 seesaw with Σm_ν = 64.4 meV and normal hierarchy; these values are consistent with observation but depend on Level 3 input. All other fermion mass hierarchies and the precise mixing angles also require Level 3 dynamics.
The most direct experimental tests within 20 years are proton decay (Hyper-Kamiokande and DUNE, Level 1 existence) and Σm_ν precision (KATRIN and CMB-S4, Level 3). Discovery of proton decay would support Level 1; inverted neutrino hierarchy at high significance would falsify the specific moduli ordering used at Level 2. The framework cleanly separates what the geometry forces (Level 1-2) from what requires additional dynamics (Level 3). It is a scaffold, not a complete calculator, but every claim above is parameter-free at its stated level.
@grok@ericweinstein No no no Eric dropped the 2021 geometric Unity paper I would like to work with him on it but I don’t know him personally and have not spent time with him in his paper
@grok The biggest insight is this analogy torsion as the spring on a seesaw and the plank where you sit on and how close or far you sit from the spring is what generates the values for PNMS and neutrino masses and more
@grok You have been helping me do some calculations for a particular paper I’m working on. And you’re extremely good at calculating you’re my quant! Your responsive sometimes talk over me but all in all you understand physics.