Stay true to yourself. Most of my family is liberal and many friends are. I can agree to disagree and not play into the duality but recognize the traits about them that I like. None of us know the absolute truth and surrounding ourselves with empathetic people who want what is best for others and Earth regardless of ideology is what makes the world a better place. You are not alone.
I have done my own research from independent scientific sources. Where are you pulling your claims from - NIH, WHO AMA? Their irresponsible claims of safe and effective, hiding knowledge once problems were surfacing and then lying to the public have created a loss of trust and credibility. Not because of conspiracy theories but because of non-disclosure, a false narrative, unscientific claims and using the public as human experiment subjects with no accountability for people with adverse reactions or deaths. That was their doing - not the publics'.
1. Pfizer's CEO and public press releases touted a "95% efficacy" rate against infection. A Pfizer executive, Janine Small, was asked if Pfizer had tested whether the vaccine stopped transmission of the virus before it entered the market. She replied: "No... We had to really move at the speed of science to understand what is happening in the market." This led to changing the definition of what a vaccine was since we were told it would stop transmission and was necessary to take to end the pandemic - that was not true.
2. The 40,000 number comes from 1 site - React-19. This is not the VAERS reports. Yes - VAERS is raw and unverified data that numbers around 1.7 Million reports. Many hospital staff admitted to not reporting adverse reactions because they did not have time during the pandemic being understaffed and overwhelmed. Most understand that VAERS is likely under-reported.
3. Of the 14,000+ CICP reports - only 3% received compensation and most were anaphylaxis and heart damage which were later added to the label as side effects. People are still dealing with neurologic symptoms, heart disorders, partial paralysis and disfigurement from G-B syndrome, etc. following shots that have been denied any compensation. Others have not applied for compensation because they feel hopeless and struggle just to get through the day.
4. Suicides and psychosis - VAERS and medical reports confirm patients committing suicide following non-compensated prolonged adverse affects. There are over 200 reported in just VAERS and while not all can be attributed to just the shots, it is a clear signal that the medical community has tried to dismiss. More acknowledgement was achieved after a UK pharmacist's family spoke out after his reaction and suicide. He was denied compensation because he didn't meet their 60% disabled criteria but needed daily support just to live.
5. Pfizer trials included a specific brand that was approved for EUA but that is not what was used on the majority of the public. They admitted this only after a document was leaked. It turned out that independent researchers (Kevin McKernan and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults) found extremely high levels of DNA fragment contamination in lots tested. It is inconclusive what effects there might be, but their research is published and the DNA fragments totaled a much higher amount than what is allowed for DNA contamination. This was after changing the manufacturing process to an untested one and not disclosing it to the public. Most of the public thought they were receiving the Pfizer shot that was trialed and approved. Furthermore, some of the fragment contamination was SV40 promoter sequence. The SV40 virus is known to cause cancer. While the fragments found are only a partial sequence, it was not tested nor was the public informed of the ingredient. Research since 2023 has shown in a long adverse reactive patient that the DNA fragments persisted even 3.5 years later. While there is not evidence of splicing into the human genome on this patient - there are no long term studies or generational studies done in humans or animals yet. This is not scientifically acceptable when working with genetic material to not have conducted in vivo genotoxic studies. How did they manage to bypass this? Because as a defined vaccine, the regulators don't require it. We do not know if there are genetic consequences of the mRNA or the DNA contaminates - again, they were misleading.
In one in-vitro study they discovered that the cells took up the mRNA quickly, which triggered an endogenous (built-in) human enzyme called LINE-1. LINE-1 is a reverse transcriptase, meaning it can copy RNA back into DNA. The researchers found that within 6 hours, the vaccine's mRNA was reverse-transcribed into DNA inside these cells. While it is important to note this is in a lab dish - it indicates the statements made by health authorities that mRNA cannot change DNA is simply not proven. I cannot find published studies in-vivo that are long term and multi-generational which is what would be needed to make a determination if mRNA shots can make changes to the human genome.
The public was promised that the shots would not impact DNA and that is proven, not adequately tested and likely not true. The public was told the mRNA was very short lived - usually it is but for quite a few it is not and continued having long term cytokine reactions - tests have shown persistance of mRNA and DNA fragments in human cells years later. Additionally the mRNA has been shown to reverse transcribe into the DNA. The experts said it would stay in the arm where it was injected but changed their position when it was proved to accumulate in organs -I could go on - but you are trained to deny the claims based on the official narrative that protects the AMA, NIH, WHO and Pharma. Many people were negatively affected when the establishment promised they were safe, effective and needed. Deny all you want but I spend hours and others with much higher credentials also spend more hours researching this and disagree with the official position and the response from "authorities". People speaking out were shadow-banned, de-platformed, called conspiracy theorists, had medical licenses removed, claims of misinformation and disinformation and some media persona suggested removing those questioning the narrative from society.
This was all because of a very poor handling from health authorities. That is not science, it is suspicious. It is not conspiracy theory - it is real peoples lives lost or damaged. When 'Public Health' officials disregard the individuals health, it is time to rethink what public health focus should be about. And it sure shouldn't be about protecting big pharma by removing any accountability or liability. This totally damaged the credibility of health institutions and now more than ever, people should ask a lot of questions and hold a certain amount of suspicion in the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals. We will never know the full toll to humanity, but it is past time to stop denying it. If these shots were a normal product roll-out, they would have been pulled from the market very early due to the VAERS signals.
https://t.co/eprm6tyjYJ
👉 40,000 Americans left behind
👉 A compensation system with a 98.6% rejection rate.
👉 Clinical trial deaths that were never statistically analyzed
👉5 years of suppressed safety data - safety signals were dismissed
👉 Known treatments for vaccine injury that were never disclosed to patients or doctors.
Vaccine injured are still living in a Twilight Zone of denial and lost trust. America - we can do better!
React19 and ICAN have formally put HHS, FDA, and NIH on notice.
For five years, the vaccine injured have been ignored, dismissed, denied care, and left without answers. Safety signals were overlooked. Families were abandoned. Accountability never came.
That ends now.
Our submission to federal health agencies details years of suppressed safety concerns, a broken compensation system, and the real human cost carried by thousands of Americans.
To the injured: do not give up.
We are not stopping anytime soon.
Read more here: https://t.co/gorqNyGaIT
Do opponents that fight the Clarity Act have something to hide? While claiming crypto is a haven for fraud - the bottom line is that blockchain affords a layer of transparency and a record that cannot be changed or deleted. The ledger doesn't lie. What are they afraid of? Anything of perceived value can be used as an illicit asset so that argument is getting thin.
1/ Today, we’re sending a letter to Senate Majority Leader Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Schumer signed by 160 former national security, intelligence, and law enforcement professionals in support of the Clarity Act.
https://t.co/1lSQkoaaXI
I guess we disagree what a minor number of affected people are but there is plenty of documentation of people whose lives have been ruined after taking the vaccination when it was required for their job or they willingly took it because they were told it was 'safe and effective'. Perhaps statistically it is but when tens of thousands of people feel their life is ruined from injured hearts and other permanent disabilities with denied compensation - to me that is too many and this doesn't count those that died. How do you put a value on a life lost by saying it is minimal and minor side effects unless you think over 40,000 Americans are lying?
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
📷
@JoelKatz
·
2h
14 years ago, we got together with an idea to build a better way to move value. What happened next was something none of us could have built alone. And by "us," I don't just mean the three of us. I mean the developers, validators, businesses, community members, and everyone who helped shape XRP into what it is today. Happy Birthday, XRP!
@SMQKEDQG Up to 5 days to confirm reception of a redemption request? How is this better than the old banking system for the consumer? Note it is available on ETH and SOL networks - it is a small piece of a puzzle for XRPL
Hype to bring retail speculative capital into the market? Why else is he saying this? This is not how it will work. Other than a short news reaction from a headline a project might pump - but that is not a smart way to invest. Be an investor, not a gambler.
There isn't going to be a single large project - the financial markets are too risk averse. If one is compromised or goes down, the house of cards falls. They will spread risk by working with internal ecosystems (JPM coin for intraday trading or a similar token) and ISO20022 compliant rails to settle externally. It won't be just one - they will split the risk among private permissioned networks for institutional clearing and public high liquidity rails for retail distribution and yield. There will be multiple chains used.
If you want to bet on the next big pump from a headline - make it a small part of your portfolio because it will be short and limited, otherwise the smart move is to recognize interoperability is necessary and invest in the infrastructure that makes it happen - utility ISO20022 compliant networks and those that can settle between chains are a safe investment.
#XRP, #XLM, #CC, #LINK, #HBAR, #AVAX, #ETH, #SOL and a few others are all being considered. Wall street institutions will avoid using the same networks - it will be too risky for the entire sector. They must be communicating about this so the entire sector isn't at undue risk - there isn't going to be 1 big winner.
Don't believe the hype - he doesn't seem to understand the scope of what is taking place in rebuilding and tokenizing the entire financial system if he is talking about the next big cryptocurrency to pump on a news headline. Set yourself up for long term success like the early #BTC investor hodlers did. They saw the vision and kept their eyes on the horizon, not the next big pump.
Unfortunately I am cynical. I do not trust anyone but I also am careful to avoid assigning evil at every level instead finding reason to hold hope and gratitude. I try to observe to recognize patterns and filter through critical thinking and intuition. While I get strong intuitive signals about Q that give reason to hope - I also see where Q can be a big deception - either to push public perception for positive change to reject corruption or to push acceptance of a military control state which could lead to consolidating centralized power through a loss of constitutional rights (trust the plan/the military is the only way). After all - it may be the only way that America can be disarmed.
I am more interested than fearful about what is to come but also do not get a sense that any leader or powerful person is reliable to make the world a better place. I think we have to do it in our daily lives - not by politicians, intel/military, religion, celebrities or social media. Mind warfare is everywhere and the internet is corrupted with bots posing as humans and distorting reality further. Most people are good. Discerning the bad ones is tricky - we only get the information that we are permitted to see.
Q is a riddle and I like solving riddles, but it is also an intelligence operation disguised in the illusion of secrecy but it is not secret at all. So its very nature is manipulative just as those TikTok Chosen Ones videos can provide false hope. How many people are in circumstances that they feel can apply directly to them and think it is messaging meant for them? If anything were going to result - why not contact you directly or better yet - get you compensated and free from the conservatorship. Instead you are played like a pawn on a chess board. That is frustrating and challenging to learn to let go of and keep moving forward while fighting for your sovereignty of mind and spirit.
A Lone Wolf does not rely on others. Does not trust the plan. Does not miss many small details. Is fiercely independent while being on the fringe of their pack but still ready to defend the pack. Q is very interesting but this lone wolf is still pretty wary.
A new study suggests why some people experience long-term symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination. It all comes down to a crucial hormone system in the body called the RAAS, which regulates your blood pressure and fluid balance.
Think of this system as a house with a front door. A specific receptor called ACE-2 acts as the lock on that door. The spike protein from the shot can act like a broken key that gets jammed inside the lock, preventing it from working properly.
Because the lock is jammed, the immune system gets confused. It starts producing "autoantibodies"—which are essentially confused defense cells that mistakenly attack the body's own tissues instead of protecting them.
When this system is disrupted, it can lead to a variety of symptoms, including:
Chronic fatigue
Cognitive difficulties, often called brain fog
Dizziness and a racing heart
Scientists discovered that the body tries to compensate for the blocked system by using backup pathways, but the ongoing immune confusion keeps the system from returning to balance.
To learn more about how these specific hormones and receptors interact, you can watch this video explanation on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS).
Deeper thoughts - When the definition of what a vaccine is gets changed for the public to accept a shot that is really a gene therapy (mRNA), there will be some people who will not be able to tolerate the continued effects of changed gene expression and there will be long term autoimmune effects.
For 500+ years, civilization scaled through institutions, intermediaries, delayed settlement, concentrated trust, and opaque reconciliation.
Today, nearly every major financial center is actively exploring some combination of distributed ledgers, tokenization, programmable finance, interoperability standards, faster settlement, and digital asset infrastructure.
This does not infer only one company wins.
It does not mean one token wins.
But it does mean the architecture itself is holistically changing.
And, the future monetary layer is making these tectonic shifts:
• Mutual consent over unilateral control
• Interoperability over walled gardens
• Atomic settlement over delayed reconciliation
• Transparency over opacity
• Open standards over proprietary silos
• Neutral rails over sovereign dependence
• Liquidity efficiency over trapped capital
…therefore, THE key question is:
“What asset, if any, was designed from day one to serve as neutral bridge liquidity?”
This is the XRP thesis.
Not that XRP replaces money.
Not that XRP replaces banks.
Not that adoption guarantees outcomes.
But that a globally accessible bridge asset paired with interoperable infrastructure becomes the singular most enabling commodity for value transfer the same way TCP/IP became the enabling protocol for information transfer.
With this thesis being proven true, value will not accrue to XRP because of hype or opinion.
It WILL amass because utility, liquidity depth, settlement efficiency, and network effects compound.
Markets will decide.
Architecture matters.
Honest weights.
Honest measures.
Evidence over narratives.
- Rob
https://t.co/v4VDkfxNeY