RWAs onchain are scaling and maturing together.
Our Tokenization Progress Index (TPI) scores how much of an asset's lifecycle has actually moved onchain.
Stablecoins sit furthest along both dimensions: large market value and higher TPI.
Tokenized Stocks show relatively high onchain maturity, while market size remains smaller.
Meanwhile, Treasuries, Commodities, and Private Credit have reached larger market sizes but still sit in lower-to-middle TPI bands.
The rest of the asset classes remain early and primitive.
For the full TPI methodology and a deeper look at the sector, read our Q1 2026 tokenization report: https://t.co/eNKDSylULP
🚨 THE BUNKER is LIVE.
A sealed underground groupchat for serious $TON operators.
No screenshots.
No leaks.
Just pure alpha in the war room.
Signals drop here first.
Private.
Invite only.
Want in?
Drop BUNKER in the comments, and join the https://t.co/aW9UqwCY6n channel.
The vault is open… for now.
@ZeusRWA Right now, i see many RWA tokens effectively priced as equity proxies by the market while being legally structured to avoid behaving like equity
that expectation mismatch may be the root cause of much of the frustration among token holders
The next phase of RWAs won’t be won by whoever tokenizes the most assets.
It will be won by whoever aligns token value with business value.
A token shouldn’t be a marketing layer sitting beside the product.
It should be part of the economic engine itself.
Great piece by @ZeusRWA
One of the clearest explanations I’ve seen of why many RWA tokens struggle despite strong products, growing AUM, & real world adoption.
The problem isn’t always execution.
It’s often token design.
tldr↓
The strongest RWA models solve this by creating a clear link between business performance and token holder outcomes.
Examples:
• Revenue sharing
• Rule-based buybacks
• Productive asset-backed tokens
• Economic utility with real demand
• Governance tied to legal control