Demography is destiny guys. Get that in mind.
No lavda lassan index is going to even mention what Hindu minorities of Bangladhesh and Pakistan have gone through.
Hello @kritisanon,
1. Don't play the woman card. You were not criticized for your gender, but for your choice of clothes in an ad. You are bringing gender into this to make it a women's issue and seek wider support from women and male feminists. It's not a gender issue. Even Ranveer Singh was criticized on Twitter for a nude photoshoot. He didn't play the gender card.
2. Personal choice stops where public commercialization begins. What you wear off-camera is entirely your prerogative. You've been in this business for years. Until now, nobody bothered you about your choice of clothes. You know why? Because nobody actually cares what you wear. The outrage here comes from a commercial choice: sexualizing a deeply sacred festival celebrated by millions. Context dictates appropriateness. If a male actor appeared bare-chested while portraying the brother in that exact scene, the public pushback would be identical. The issue is sacredness and context, not gender.
3. Claiming "clothes don't define culture" directly contradicts human history. Attire is a foundational visual language of every global tradition, you cannot wear a Kimono and call it Indian ethnic wear, nor can you strip a festival of its sacred aesthetic without altering its significance. If attire truly has zero bearing on cultural respect, then tomorrow is Eid. Can you wear that exact same outfit you wore in that ad and wish Eid Mubarak? You said clothes don't define the respect you have for culture in your heart. So do it and we'll take our criticism back.
Respecting a tradition means honoring its context, not commodifying it under the guise of fashion.
33 Ministers. 0 Women.
That is Congress’ idea of “women’s empowerment” in Karnataka.
They preach representation everywhere else, but when it comes to sharing power, women find no place at the table.
This isn’t empowerment. It’s hypocrisy.
#CongressExposed
पोस्ट देख रहे हिंदुओं से बस यही कहना है कि ज्यादा से ज्यादा @Uppolice को मेंशन कर देना |
इसने क्या किया है यह बताने की आवश्यकता नहीं है क्योंकि फोटो ही पर्याप्त है |
@mathurapolice आपसे निवेदन है कि इस मामले को ढीला ना छोड़ा जाए |
Delhi, 650 years ago:
India was under foreign Muslim rule and Sharia.
An old Brahmin decided to fight back.
He publicly performed Ghar Wapsi of thousands of Muslim men and women.
When this news came to Sultan Firoz Tughlaq, he offered two choices to the Brahman.
1) Islam.
2) Death by burning.
The Brahman chose death. He was burned to death in broad daylight. Even when his body was burning before his very eyes, he did not utter a cry. He had no fear and no regrets. Such was his dedication for the nation and dharma.
Today, the descendants of this Brahman are classified by Indian state as "oppressors" and systematically discriminated. Descendants of Firoz Shah, on the other hand, are classified as "oppressed" and given doles, freebies and reservations
@singhrahul2012@AstroPrashanth9 Haanji mut diya na stats ki baat ayi tab? Hawa me gyaan chod sakte ho aap bhosdiwale real stats ki baat aayi tab maa chudwali na 😂😂