@BenGarciaShow If Micheal Wilson is pricing himself ahead of Zay after a nice half season stretch of garbage time 50 passes a game, then good luck man. Zay is one of the most underrated WRs in the league. Outproduced Wilson 3/3 years so far
@BenGarciaShow First 3 paragraphs were true, and then it became utterly ridiculous after that. Expect more from you Ben.
“He’s a career 38-48 Quarterback”. And the team is 5-25 without him.
We held him back much more than he did us. This is just another example of Darnold/Goff/Geno
A lot of the narratives tossed out about Kyler Murray are just flat out lazy. I lived in Arizona for 12 years before moving to MN last Summer and followed many of his performances. There are inherent risks to his size and style of play, but you take the gamble because of his insane athletic upside. Many of the things held against him were issues with the organization and NOT the QB.
I can’t emphasize enough how grateful I am to feel that ASU football is on its best trajectory as a program since I’ve been a fan. In my time, we’ve had glimmers of hope but never this much alignment of leadership, coaching, talent evaluation/procurement, and community buy-in.
BREAKING: Four-Star OT Jake Hildebrand has Committed to Arizona State, he tells me for @Rivals The 6’6 300 OT from Chandler, AZ chose the Sun Devils over Oregon, Texas A&M, and Utah
“ASU!! I'm staying home!! #forksup#agtg 🔱🔱”
https://t.co/6AN9I5pcIw
The tech bros don't understand economics. That's why they keep talking about mass unemployment as a result of AI. It is a mixture of marketing, ignorance, and ego at work.
In reality, if AI is a success it will lower the price of goods and services by solving problems for business, inventors, researchers, etc.
Those lower prices mean more savings for consumers. Those savings will get turned into either more investment or more consumption.
Technology only gets adopted by human beings if it improves their lives. If AI isn't productive or useful, people won't use it and it won't matter. AI is not a "replacement" for human beings. AI does not have a will. LLMs do not long for happiness. They do not have desires.
AI is a tool. Human beings use tools because we find them useful. They help us create little pieces of happiness for ourselves.
Take the example of cancer. If AI manages to help researchers find cures for cancer then America's oncologists (~14,000) will be unemployed.
That is a good thing. We would get to live in a cancer-free world AND redirect the current expenditures on cancer treatment (~$200 billion per annum) into new lines of production, solving new problems.
That is a much better world, even if it means America's oncologists need to find new lines of work. And there will be more work to be done because we are finite, mortal beings who long to have the good and have it forever.
Yeah turns out if you build a big computer that doesn't require many people to operate, it's going to cost a lot relative to how many jobs it creates, but it can benefit the area via tax revenue. This metric is about as meaningful as saying a bridge doesn't create many jobs relative to how much it costs to build.
Everyone who cares about climate should understand this. Texas, with no pro-climate policies, has blown passed California in clean energy. In large part because Texas has less red tape and makes it easier to build.
always puzzles me that socialists come after Bezos, the man who has delivered more consumer surplus than possibly any living human. if there's anyone who can plausibly claim to have created far, far more abundance than he has personally extracted it's him.
the answer to everything, up to and apparently including bankrupting an airline at the cost of something like 15,000 jobs and the entire concept of budget airfare, is “jeff bezos has a lot of money though”