@PGM_LOL@9991biraj@TheAthleticFC I think it could easily been ruled that Enzo interfered. I also think it’s not the robbery of the century to say he didnt.
@9991biraj@TheAthleticFC An idiot who cannot read: refs on the pitch decided on Haaland’s offside which wasn’t: VAR intervened. They did not decide on Enzo’s offside and, in that play, the VAR would have needed more compelling evidence that Martinez was affected by Enzo to intervene.
@estherzelda0514 Jurors are not expected to be law experts. If after hearing everything from the case he had the conviction that she was guilty, he 100% did whats his country asked of him. Also he was right in a deep moral and philosophical way, obviously.
@g_lamarche@michaelshermer If peopke who have it cannot be responsible for murdering kids, then you’ll agree they have to take the kids away from them at first sign?
@CerryBart @cOsMicTriG@michaelshermer Infertile men and women have a developed physiological structure to produce either eggs or sperm. It’s as if a blender is lacking a piece, any technician can still say it is a blender because of the funtionality its structure points to.
@HistoryBoomer This trial shows (if just that) how stupid and unfalsifiable the insanity defense can be. If you dont think thats relevant in a world replete with hobo / drug induced crime, you may be living under a rock.