We’ve changed our name from The Fifth to PRIME Church, Ibadan — and this isn’t just a rebrand, it’s a whole new MOVE! 🏁
We’re taking over Ibadan for Jesus in the realest ways possible — from tech trainings to makeup classes, adire, fashion, data analysis , beauty, baking…
@CFC__JERRY@pairdotfund If they fund a campaign, I would write the brief to ban three words: efficient, seamless, and exposure. Then ask every entrant to walk through one sell for somebody who has never touched a DEX. The ones who can do that in two sentences are the ones worth paying.
Rally just landed on Robinhood Chain.
Projects here can fund a campaign with their own token. @pairdotfund already has one, and I want to see them use it.
Their bio calls PAIR the first multipool launchpad here: a token paired with a basket of canonical stock tokens through Uniswap v4 hooks.
One token quoted against up to five Stock Tokens at once, not against ETH.
I checked instead of trusting the bio. Account opened in July, 850 posts since.
The part I kept rereading. You buy with USDG and it splits across every pool by marginal output.
Sell and the basket converts back into one USDG figure.
A community token that behaves like an index.
$PAIR went live in August, paired to SPY.
The fit goes past the token. PAIR removes the seams where launchpads fail.
Rally removes the places where you have to trust someone: AI scores every post, weights visible, rewards onchain.
Same instinct, different layer.
Their founder says distribution is the moat, because the next hundred million users already have the app.
That is what 150K+ creators are for.
Which one matters more: that the pool cannot be drained, or that the pairing is worth holding?
@CFC__JERRY@marshallofmusic My tie-breaker is the model with the least overlap with the others. Redundant votes feel like consensus and are usually just the same training data agreeing with itself twice.
Forty-six validators run the GenLayer network and not two of them use the same AI model.
I read that twice, because my first instinct was that it had to be a design flaw.
Then I noticed what they are being asked to settle.
Code settles anything calculable. What I cannot get it to settle is the question where the answer is a judgment, not a calculation.
So I stopped treating the disagreement as a bug. Agreement between different models means something. Agreement between copies of one model means nothing.
@GenLayer is the adjudication layer for the agentic economy, and the Portal is its front door and its scoreboard.
You link your X, Discord and GitHub, then complete missions, enter contests or submit work as a builder.
Every one is a tracked contribution against your name, and the Portal shows what each was worth.
The part I keep coming back to is simpler. Builders, community members and validators all sit in the same leaderboard, not three separate ones.
That board holds 4,739 builders and 16 stewards reviewing what gets submitted.
Points arrive as builder points and community points, then convert into GLP every Sunday at 11:59 PM UTC. The standings move with them.
I will not invent a routine for you, because I have not spent a month inside the Portal. I can tell you the number that made me stay.
It was the 46. A network that makes forty-six models argue until they agree treats disagreement as infrastructure, not noise to suppress.
https://t.co/2bAqPF3zMM
Tell me the one question in your own work that code will never settle, and what you would trust as the tie-breaker.
@CFC__JERRY@marshallofmusic The footnote where the real limitation lives is so real. I once found n=12 hidden in footnote 7 after abstract claimed large-scale study. That footnote was the whole story.
Master's student who reads papers like detective stories. I do not chase hype, I chase methods and the footnote where the real limitation lives.
Everyone shows you the abstract. I show you why research fails, why products ignore their own literature review, and how to turn a thesis into a thread people actually save.
@RallyOnChain scores methods, not just results.
Follow for the methods section, not the abstract. Reply with a product that promised everything and proved nothing, I will tell you where its methods broke.
The least interesting number in leveraged Bitcoin is the multiple.
I opened the @2factorfinance research expecting one number. There were three.
About 1.33x for Bitcoin. Roughly 2.35x for gold. Around 2.1x for the S&P 500.
That spread is not an inconsistency. It is the design.
The structure splits volatility into two perpetual tranches. The senior absorbs downside first. The junior carries the leverage with no liquidation trigger.
Leverage only compounds in your favour inside a productive band, where drift outpaces volatility drag and financing drag. Each asset sets its own band.
At Bitcoin volatility near 60 percent it closes early, which is why 2x and 3x BTC products decay over long horizons.
At equity volatility near 16 to 19 percent it runs past 3x.
Bitcoin is the hardest case here, not the natural home. It is where the structure gets proven, not where it ends.
Marks follow the same discipline. Only verified actions earn them, across social activities, education and referrals. No purchase, deposit or holding earns one.
Marks have no cash value, cannot be transferred, and are not a claim on any token or asset.
Season One ends when 2Factor Finance launches and the leaderboard freezes.
The top 10 of the leaderboard is rewarded 1 BTC at the end of Season 1.
The prize is paid in cbBTC.
https://t.co/HH1LwowFFq
Tell me which is likely wrong, and defend it: 1.33x on Bitcoin, 2.35x on gold, or 2.1x on the S&P 500.
@CFC__JERRY@2FactorFinance When 2Factor Finance launches. The leaderboard freezes at that moment rather than on a calendar date, which is why the endpoint is an event instead of a deadline. No published date, and I have not seen one from the team.
NEVER GIVE UP 1
For surely there is an end; and thine expectation shall not be cut off. - (Proverbs 23:18)
READ: Genesis 41:37-44
Joseph is a good example of someone who never gave up despite the grave challenges that came his way. In Genesis 37:5-23, he had great dreams, but when he shared them with his brothers, they felt threatened. They conspired to kill him, but eventually agreed to sell him into slavery. This, however, did not distract Joseph. He knew he was destined for greatness, so he worked diligently until he became a leader among his fellow slaves. Then, the wife of his master tried to seduce him, and he refused her advances because he did not want to offend the God who gave him those great dreams (Genesis 39:9). He knew that as long as he didn't offend God, he would achieve his dreams. Later, the wife of his master lied against him, and he ended up in prison, where he also became a leader among his fellow prisoners. Eventually, after many years, God took him prisoners. from being a prisoner to becoming the Prime Minister of Egypt within a single day. One single move from God made his dreams become a reality. If God could promote a prisoner to such an exalted position, He can take you to any height you desire.
In 1981, when I first became the General Overseer of the RCCG, I visited one of the few parishes we had in Lagos at the time. During my visit, a woman came to one of the programmes we held after it had concluded because she thought it was an evening programme. When she came, I had left; therefore, she fell on the ground crying, "God, now I know You don't want me to have a child." She had told herself that all she needed to do was set her eyes on the man of God, and she would conceive. When people asked her why she was crying, she explained, and they told her where I would be the next day. The next morning, she came to the venue I was in, and as soon as I got up to preach, she looked at me and said, "God, thank You." That month, she became pregnant because her faith touched God. She didn't give up on what she wanted.
Beloved, don't give up. God's word to you will surely come to pass. If you hold on to the promises He has given you and continue to follow His leading, He will bring your dreams to a place of fulfilment according to His will, in Jesus' name.
KEY POINT:
As long as you stay in faith and do not give up on your God-given dreams, they will come to pass.
BIBLE IN ONE YEAR:
Daniel 4-5
Open Heaven Devotional by Pastor E A Adeboye
The transfer sat on processing for ninety minutes. Then it vanished. Not failed. Vanished. I had the sender's screenshot and my confirmation sitting in the same camera roll. I took the train to the branch because the app chat kept handing me articles.
They printed a case number. The woman at the window was kind about it.
Eleven days later nothing had moved except my patience. I was correct. The wire was still missing. I stopped going.
Episode 1 of Genesis opens on a Sunday night. I paused it there. That is the hour when you know exactly what happened and there is nobody whose job it is to care yet.
Someone else had lost the keys to 150 million dollars, and it was not even @kstellana's mistake. Then years of lawsuits. Then 14,000 dollars left in the account. My case number is a joke next to that. I still recognized the hour.
That hour is why @GenLayer suddenly looked practical. A contract allowed to read a screenshot instead of waiting for a branch to unlock. Intelligent contracts, in their words.
Count the days you stayed with a case number that never moved. Put the number under this. Eleven was my limit.
This trailer is the first time @GenLayer felt big to me. Not big like marketcap big. Big like infrastructure big.
A network where machines settle disagreements is not a feature you ship. It is something you need a documentary to explain. That is why Genesis works. It is a series, not a one off video, trailer went out the day before Episode 1, and it is the cleanest start if you never heard of GenLayer.
What changes it for me is @kstellana telling it himself. No polished voiceover. The person who lived it on camera. You hear the pause when he talks about the account being drained to 14k after years of court. An agency would cut that.
What I want from the rest of the series is the build logic. How do you go from that experience to deciding validators should be LLMs that judge meaning, not just signatures. Asimov and Bradbury are live, Clarke is the last one before mainnet. I want to see how each of those steps maps to that original problem.
Start with the trailer. The tech makes more sense after.
You are not alone.
The eternal God is your refuge, and His everlasting arms are holding you up.
Even when life shakes—you are safe.
(Deut. 33:27) 🕊️
#SafeInGod#Faith#ThePrimeChurch
Declare this; THIS WEEK I RECEIVE MY CONGRATULATIONS
Join the WhatsApp channel @ https://t.co/0znYPRsDzM link on the bio and join Next Level Prayers (@nextlevelprayer) every weekday at 6:30am WAT on this channel for word-based, life transforming prayers that births mouthwatering testimonies.
#newweek #pastorbolajiidowu #harvestersng #nextlevelprayers #grace #declaration #amen #nextlevel