And suddenly, Australia has what is probably now the harshest penalties in the world for privacy violations:
whichever is the greater:
- $50M
- 3x the value of benefit obtained through the misuse of info
- 30% of adjusted turnover in the relevant period https://t.co/9YN0gwCKaH
@elonmusk You mean the Elon take on past moderation decisions?
I assume you will be publishing internal docs on how you arrived and will arrive at all current and future decisions?
@kenklippenstein@Popehat Elon knows the service he is creating is toxic. He has some delusion the trainwreck will be so watchable the clicks will magically monetize. But they won't.
@privacyguru The problem with giving everyone free speech rights in Elon's virtual town square, is that you don't end up with a marketplace of ideas, but instead a shouting match.
Half the voices and ideas leave because the other half are loud, obnoxious and threatening.
Advertisers flee.
@elonmusk@ZacksJerryRig Is Twitter going to be a neutral platform?
Elon's tweets don't make a good case for it.
He wants logic. Perhaps he's coming to the right conclusions at times. But should He, or any one person, be coming to any conclusions about the Truth?
Bias exists everywhere, in everyone.
@elonmusk@ZacksJerryRig Interesting to see The Arbitor picking and choosing sources, whatever their validity, and then imposing his Judgment on Truthiness.
@elonmusk What are you going to do when they vote for hate speech?
When they vote to post disinformation?
And BTW, who the fuck are "they"? I thought you had a bot problem you hadn't addressed?
@ZoeSchiffer Building an org with a take-no-prisoners break-things fail-fast my-way-or-the-highway can work.
Taking over a company + imposing this mentality... is an entirely different prop. Doesn't make sense in a high stakes, high vis game where you need teamwork.
Elon can't solve alone.