@bostonherald So why are you ok with the brutal strangulation of 3 kids Huh? Why are you ok with the idea of letting a gender get away with crimes because of hormones? Will you be ok with this if this happened to you?
You know the Lindsay Clancy case really shows the world a few things that if you don't agree with the rest on a jury then you will be outed so why serve a jury if not even the court will protect you and how much the lives of the children really mattered compared to hormones
@SueOC_NBCBoston I want you to remember what you did because soon its gonna happen to a lone juror you want to protect and no one is going to let you and expose that person the have them harassed and judge. just remember you set that precedent you said it was ok to dox someone.
@oksanka_luky you also don't accidentally kill three kids, hormones or not but that's ok just keep bashing the guy who voted not guilty right? it is easier to bash him than to admit that we should have a child murderer behind bars. Bet we wouldnt have this convo if he had just voted not guilty
@bostonherald So why are you ok with the brutal strangulation of 3 kids Huh? Why are you ok with the idea of letting a gender get away with crimes because of hormones? Will you be ok with this if this happened to you?
@AlexisKat6 but killing three children is ok right? or having a conviction of assault and battery then voting not guilty for said child murderer is ok right? since you wanted to bash this guy for his vote you did plan to mention this right?
🚨 Lindsay Clancy holdout juror Michael told Fugitive TV in his phone interview that NBC Boston conveniently left out details about his 2021 incident with his now ex-wife.
Michael said shit ultimately hit the fan after he found out his ex-wife was here ILLEGALLY, and that’s why he filed for divorce.
So many lies have been said about this man, and the fact that media outlets knew the truth and chose not to report it is what’s really disgusting. SHAME ON ALL OF YOU!
🎥: @FugitiveTV_Live
@tracey09_ while we are at it and you had no intention of mentioning it but one of the juror who voted not guilty was convicted of assault and battery should their vote be disqualified as well or just the one you didn't agree with
@xQwirk A serial killer is an individual who unlawfully murders two or more victims in separate events over a period of time, usually with a cooling-off period between the crimes -FBI.gov
Thought you would like the definition just in case you forgotten
@decoyposts she couldnt bear looking at the families on the offset chance that her choice to deem someone as not guilty would enable more child deaths?
@CollinRugg you know how you can make it better? charge her with premeditated murder that way it shows that your actions have conquences and then people will give a bit more thought into what they do before committing that kind of crime
@sappholives83 so since we are on the subject you will bring up the fact that one of the jurors who voted not guilty was convicted of assault and battery previously right? it would be a shame to try to bash someone's choice based off their past.
@DoctorTurtleboy so you plan to at least inform everyone of the other juror who was convicted of assaulted and battery previously that was voting not guilty right? or was this just a ploy just to find something else just to hate him