Should employees be legally protected from AI displacement?
The decision of a court in China to award more than £28,000 to a worker… has attracted global attention as legislators assess how to respond to the technological threat to jobs.
https://t.co/UXYmpaN0uc via @PeopleMgt
“In the UK and Europe, however, regulatory approval has been slower. As a result, companies are accumulating real-world, driverless data at different rates.”
Robotaxis need to be tested in real traffic via @FT
https://t.co/znK7kAp15g
"...paper from Leland Crane and Paul Soto of US Federal Reserve, which represents the first time to my knowledge that official labour market statistics have corroborated the story from detailed private payroll data that AI is reducing employment in some pockets of the economy."
A Chinese brand, the #820RR, has just beaten #Ducati in WorldSSP at Portimão. A small story in itself, perhaps, but part of a bigger pattern of Chinese firms moving from cost competition into performance markets.
https://t.co/tfKdEBWn3c
“But LinkedIn’s algorithm seems to reward posts that read like actual nonsense. Little wonder, as business life is a rich seam for bullshit, with roles springing up that are impenetrable to outsiders.”
Anthropologist David Graeber’s term “bullshit jobs” chimed with those frustrated by (or in) a growing category of white-collar jobs, whose work is “so completely pointless, unnecessary, or pernicious that even the employee cannot justify its existence”
https://t.co/DoIkUD27JT
@BayesBSchool’s research has been ranked 3rd in the UK, 8th in Europe and 73rd in the world in the University of Texas at Dallas’ (UTD) latest Top 100 Business School Research Ranking!
@CityStGeorges@AlumniBayes
https://t.co/1f1v1F2a0w
@BayesBSchool’s research has been ranked 3rd in the UK, 8th in Europe and 73rd in the world in the University of Texas at Dallas’ (UTD) latest Top 100 Business School Research Ranking!
@CityStGeorges@AlumniBayes
https://t.co/1f1v1F2a0w
@PeterDiamandis ... but getting to that stage will take some effort, and time, and money, and institutional and cultural barriers to overcome ... and if history is anything to go by, it will not happen overnight, or in the next couple of years. It could take decades, and generations.
@MartinRich106 Xiaomi promised to keep parts and services available for 10 years. I suspect most parts would be available for longer via newer generation cars and 3D printing etc.
#Xiaomi seems to be applying smartphone logic to cars, retiring its 1st gen #SU7 after only 22 months and 380k units sold. A bold move but automotive success is not just about launch speed. It is also about trust, safety, durability, service and residual value. Any thoughts?