Olivia
Online
Tim Noakes
@ProfTimNoakes
Author, Emeritus Professor, runner, LCHF/Banting/CrossFit proponent. No longer registered medical doctor. Spreading scientific information, not medical advice.
Cape Town, South Africa
Joined April 2012
139 Following
157.9K Followers
227.1K Posts
Pinned Tweet
Thanks so much @zoeharcombe for helping save all of us and for never forgetting. @bigfatsurprise @CarynZinn
Wow! I had never seen this before! Andy and I just watched it on Prof Noakes day. So emotional ❤️
https://t.co/hdv2DKioJq
UCT’s Council should reject attempts to sanction @AdvOppenheimer and @DavidAnsara for publicly challenging university policy and defending contested speech. Universities should protect open debate, not punish those who question prevailing views.
https://t.co/rvQqSUZj22
@SpeechAfrica @AdvOppenheimer @DavidAnsara Absolute disgrace that they have allowed UCT to fall so far
the left are truly a vile bunch
Where Are The Babies? The Birth Rate Collapse and Stillbirths After the Covid-19 Vaccine Rollout. Australia must now leave the world health organisation!!! https://t.co/g91XIuFKd6
WITHDRAW THE PRODUCTS. OPEN THE RECORDS. ENFORCE ACCOUNTABILITY.
By Professor Ian Brighthope
I want the COVID-19 vaccine programme brought to an end. I am calling for the complete withdrawal of these products and an independent public investigation with the power to compel evidence, examine decisions and establish responsibility.
After more than four decades in nutritional and environmental medicine, my position is uncompromising: the public deserves access to the evidence behind every assurance made in its name.
No manufacturer, minister, regulator or medical institution should be permitted to settle questions about its own conduct behind closed doors. Public confidence must be earned through disclosure, scrutiny and accountability.
Release the contracts. Release the underlying trial data. Release the safety assessments, manufacturing records and communications concerning adverse events. Explain what was known, when it was known, and what action followed.
An assurance is not a substitute for an answer.
I want an independent assessment of cancer risk, reproductive toxicity, pregnancy outcomes and possible long-term effects, with access to the underlying evidence and freedom to publish its conclusions. That assessment must examine individual products and investigate whether any demonstrated risks extend across the platform.
If the evidence meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic to humans, that classification must follow without political interference. If a product is shown to cause developmental harm, it must be recognised and regulated accordingly. Neither conclusion should be dictated in advance. Neither should be ruled out to protect a commercial investment or a government’s reputation.
The allegation that these products constitute a “bioweapon” demands evidence of extraordinary seriousness. I will demand disclosure and investigation sufficient to test allegations of deliberate wrongdoing. A public inquiry must distinguish negligence, recklessness, deception and intentional harm, and establish what the evidence actually supports.
I want accountability that reaches every responsible level.
Manufacturers must answer for their products and representations. Regulators must answer for their assessments and decisions. Ministers must answer for their policies. Institutions and promoters must answer for the claims they made and the information they possessed.
Responsibility must be established individually. Where evidence supports criminal charges, prosecutions should follow. Where a court proves criminal wrongdoing, punishment should reflect the gravity of the offence. Where civil liability is established, compensation should follow. Where professional misconduct is proved, disciplinary consequences should follow.
A company’s size must offer no protection. Public office must offer no sanctuary. Institutional prestige must offer no exemption.
People reporting serious injury deserve respectful investigation, appropriate care and a fair process for compensation. Families deserve clear explanations supported by accessible evidence. Their experiences must be examined carefully, without prejudgment or dismissal.
I also want Australia to leave the World Health Organization and the United Nations through the necessary lawful processes.
That is my political judgment about sovereignty and democratic accountability. Australians must be able to identify who makes decisions affecting their lives, examine the evidence behind those decisions and remove those responsible when they fail.
We can cooperate internationally through transparent agreements whose obligations are openly debated. We can support humanitarian work, exchange scientific knowledge and respond to emergencies while retaining direct democratic control over Australian policy.
My demand is concrete: withdraw the COVID-19 vaccine products, preserve and disclose the evidence, establish an independent inquiry with compulsory powers, provide a fair pathway for injured people, and prosecute wrongdoing wherever the evidence warrants it.
I will not accept commercial confidentiality as a sufficient answer to questions of public safety. I will not accept institutional embarrassment as a reason to withhold evidence. I will not accept political convenience as a reason to abandon accountability.
The public carried the consequences of these decisions. The people who made them must now answer for them.
Ian Brighthope
Who to follow
James DiNicolantonio
@drjamesdinic
Doctor of Pharmacy and Cardiovascular Research Scientist
Paul Saladino, MD
@paulsaladinomd
Eat Food for Humans and thrive.
Animal foods are essential for optimal human health. Food quality over calorie counting.
Georgia Ede MD
@GeorgiaEdeMD
Psychiatrist focused on the connection between nutrition, metabolism, and #mentalhealth. Author of Change Your Diet, Change Your Mind.
From the West Coast through Cape Town, to the Winelands, Overberg and the Garden Route to the Central Karoo, across our towns, farms and cities, we share more than a map.
We share the right to determine our future, and the responsibility to build it together
The Cape of Good Hope — our own country
Let's Vote CAPEXIT on 4 November!
Join Us at https://t.co/5hnfazSlJm and Get Involved now!
Maggie the Rancher just flexed on every diet guru telling you meat will kill you.
At 85 years old, Maggie White is still working 14-hour days on her Alberta cattle ranch — often in sub-zero temperatures — and she looks like she could outwork half the people half her age. She’s been a lifelong carnivore for more than 65 years. Meat and water. That’s it. No kale. No seed oils. No “balanced plate” lectures from people who’ve never castrated a bull in a blizzard.
Born in 1941, she left veterinary school, moved west, and built a life raising cattle. While the rest of the world was being told red meat causes heart disease and aging, Maggie just kept eating the food that made sense to her body and kept working the land. She still runs her herd, still does the physical work, and still looks decades younger than her actual age. When most people her age are managing pill organizers, she’s managing cattle.
This isn’t theory. This is a woman who dropped the modern food guidelines before most of them existed and never looked back. Hard physical work + ancestral food = function that refuses to quit. She doesn’t need a study to tell her what she can already feel in her arms, her joints, and her ability to still get the job done every single day.
The same institutions that spent decades warning us away from meat now have to explain people like Maggie. The ones who ignored the advice, ate the animals they raised, and stayed strong while everyone else got softer, sicker, and more medicated. Ranchers like her have been living the experiment the rest of us are only now catching up to.
Maggie doesn’t flex for likes. She flexes because the work still needs doing and her body still answers the call. That’s the real flex — not looking young for your age, but remaining capable of the life you actually want to live.
Eat the meat. Do the work. Stay dangerous. 🥩
The sun became dangerous in about 1950, and it took a factory to do it.
Two million years on the African plain, naked, on the equator, midday.
Roman legions marched from Spain to Syria in a tunic and sandals.
Polynesians crossed 3,000 miles of open Pacific in a canoe with nothing over their heads.
Irish navvies dug the railways of England shirtless through the 1840s.
Victorian cricketers stood in a field for 5 days in August.
Welsh hill farmers brought in the hay with their sleeves rolled up for 40 summers and died of something else.
Bondi, 1935. Thousands of fair-skinned Australians on the sand all day, and the only thing anyone rubbed in was coconut oil.
Melanoma that year was 1 in 1,500. A curiosity.
Then the fat changed.
Cottonseed oil, soybean oil, corn oil, sunflower oil. Pressed out of seeds by machinery that did not exist before 1900 and put in every tin, jar and fryer on earth by 1960.
Seed oil goes rancid. Leave a bottle open on the counter and it turns. Heat it and it turns faster. Ultraviolet light turns it fastest of all.
Rancidity is oxygen getting into the weak points of a fat molecule. Seed oil has two weak points on every molecule. Butter has none. Dripping has none.
Your skin is built out of the fat you eat, replaced every couple of years.
Sunlight lands on skin built from seed oil and the fat goes rancid inside you. The redness, the heat, the blistering, the peeling. That is rancid fat being cleared away by your immune system.
Sunburn is your skin going off like a bottle of sunflower oil left on a windowsill.
Melanoma today is 1 in 33.
The sun did the same thing to your skin that it did to your great-grandfather's. He was made of beef.
Share‼️‼️
Honestly, Elon Musk is the only pioneer left who makes you truly inspired & amazed by innovation. Landing rockets backwards, driving cars upside down...it feels like our great American pioneer spirit went dormant since the Apollo missions, and we've felt stuck in time, but he's reawakened it...and for the first time in decades people are actually asking "what else is possible?" instead of this gloomy malaise of stagnation and planned obsolescence. Just the dumbest thing imaginable to bet against this guy.
Whatever your view on the Akademia project, this is remarkable. The pictures are from March, May, August and October. They have a vision, a budget, a timeline and deadlines, and they are getting it done. Every cent is spent where it is allocated and accounted for.
Imagine following nearly 13 million real people for more than 10 years just to see what cholesterol level helps them live the longest. That is exactly what Korean scientists did in a giant 2019 study. They tracked 12.8 million adults who had check-ups between 2001 and 2004, and they kept watching until 2013. More than 694,000 people died during that long stretch.
The results were clear and surprising. Cholesterol and death formed a U-shape. Very low cholesterol was linked to higher death rates. So was very high cholesterol. The sweet spot for the longest life was 210 to 249 mg/dL for most adults. That is higher than many doctors call “ideal.” Younger people had a slightly lower best range, but still not the super-low numbers often pushed today.
Because the study lasted so many years, reverse causality is less likely to explain the low-cholesterol danger. Reverse causality means a hidden illness might lower your cholesterol right before it kills you. With more than a decade of follow-up, early sickness cannot easily account for the extra deaths seen in people who started with low cholesterol. The pattern held across ages and for both men and women.
The huge number of people—almost the entire adult population of a country—makes the findings hard to ignore. Smaller studies can be wrong by chance. This one is massive. It shows that moderately higher total cholesterol, not the lowest possible number, went with the best chance of living longer in this large group.
In short, the biggest study of its kind found that cholesterol levels in the low-to-mid 200s were tied to the longest lives, and the long tracking time makes it tougher to blame the higher death rates at low levels on reverse causality alone.
This child would grow up to make paralyzed people walk, blind people see, save free speech and make cars fly.
These 3.5 seconds did more to fortify American Identity than any establishment politician or political party in the last generation.
100 years of neoliberal rule was vaporized in 3.5 seconds.
Rejoice, we are still America. 🇺🇸
Today at the World Nutrition Summit in Cape Town:
From “We Can’t” to “We Must”: The Case for a Ruminant Revolution.
“If humans require better nourishment, the job of agriculture is not to explain why the required food cannot be produced. The job is to increase the biological productivity of the system until it can.”
We need to move beyond producing calories to nourishing humanity.
Scan the QR code for my presentation PDF (with speaker notes) and individual slide images. @TheNoakesF NS2026itionSummit
Medical scheme premiums in South Africa are rising faster than inflation, amid rumours that the drivers are cardiac and clot-related. Right now an actuary somewhere has been tasked with coming up with an explanation that is not related to the Covid shots.
I sat across from my co-founder of Neo cardiac surgeon Dr Philip Ovadia who has opened hundreds of chests.
I asked him one question. What goes through your mind before every operation.
His answer stopped me cold.
"The healthcare system has failed that person on my operating table."
Not their genetics. Not their choices. The system.
We know what causes heart disease. We have known for years. But medicine has been chasing the wrong target.
While doctors focus on lowering cholesterol, three forces are silently destroying arterial walls from the inside.
Insulin resistance. Chronic inflammation. Metabolic dysfunction.
No one tests for them. No one treats them.
Instead, we are now screening teenagers for high cholesterol and putting children on medications. Because the only answer medicine has is to lower a number that was never the real problem.
The number one question patients ask before heart surgery is simple.
Why did this happen?
They took the medications. Ate the low fat diet. Followed every instruction they were given.
And they still ended up on the operating table.
After surgery, most of them come back. Another stent. Another bypass. Eventually heart failure.
Because nothing was done about what caused the disease in the first place.
The healthcare system does not try to stop heart disease.
It manages the damage. It slows the decline. It never asks whether the disease could go away.
This is Dr. Philip Ovadia. Cardiac surgeon. Co-founder of Neo Root.
This is the conversation that started everything.
The truth heals
The ANC's leadership over the last 32 years, vote wisely
4th Nov.
THIS IS BIG!
The Cancer Cells That Changed Their Minds
A KAIST team just reversed cancer without killing a single cell — and the method may matter more than the result.
For a century, oncology has had exactly one strategy: find the cancer and destroy it.
Chemotherapy poisons it. Radiation burns it. Surgery cuts it out. Immunotherapy teaches the body to hunt it. Every weapon differs in precision, but not in philosophy. The tumor is an enemy. You win by killing.
Now a team at South Korea's KAIST has proposed a heresy: *what if the tumor doesn't need to die?*
In a study led by Professor Kwang-Hyun Cho of the Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, published in Advanced Science ("Control of Cellular Differentiation Trajectories for Cancer Reversion," DOI 10.1002/advs.202402132), researchers took colon cancer cells and — without poisoning, irradiating, or cutting them — turned them back into normal cells.
Not dead. Not damaged. Just normal again.
The tumors, grown in mice, shrank dramatically. The surrounding tissue was left intact, because there was never an attack to survive.
This is early research — cell lines and animal models, no human trials, real obstacles still unsolved. But the conceptual break is the story. For the first time, cancer treatment has a second verb. Not just destroy. Also: convert.
The digital twin of a cell
The KAIST team's insight begins with a redefinition of what cancer is.
The conventional view treats cancer as a pile of broken machinery: mutations accumulate, checkpoints fail, cells proliferate. Cho's group looked at the same evidence and saw something different — a trajectory. During oncogenesis, they observed, normal cells don't just break. They regress, sliding backward along the differentiation path they followed when they matured. A colon cell becomes, in effect, a confused stem cell: immature, proliferative, lost.
If cancer is a wrong turn on a developmental road, then the treatment question changes. You don't blow up the road. You build a map and find the turn.
That map is what the team calls a digital twin — a complete computational model of the gene network governing a cell's differentiation. Using data from 4,252 intestinal cells, they reconstructed a network of 522 interacting components, capturing how genes regulate one another as a cell matures or degrades.
Then they did the audacious thing: they asked the simulation which levers, flipped together, would push a cancer cell back down the road toward normalcy.
The answer came through a system they built called BENEIN (Boolean Network Inference and Control), which models gene interactions as logical relationships and systematically tests which interventions redirect the network's state. The simulation pointed to three master regulators — the genes MYB, HDAC2, and FOXA2 — acting together as the switch that holds the cancerous state in place.
Turn all three off simultaneously, the model predicted, and the cell would stop proliferating and differentiate into something resembling a normal intestinal cell.
They tested it, and it worked.
In three colon cancer cell lines, suppressing MYB, HDAC2, and FOXA2 together strongly induced differentiation into normal-like cells. The cancer cells began expressing markers of healthy intestinal tissue. Proliferation collapsed — not because the cells died, but because they grew up.
In animal models, tumors formed from the reprogrammed cells were dramatically smaller than controls, and under the microscope they looked far more like normal tissue. The signature achievement, and the one that would matter most to any patient reading this: there was no collateral damage. Nothing was poisoned, burned, or irradiated. The healthy tissue never came under fire, because there was no fire.
1 of 2
🚨 “SIX MONTHS TO LIVE.” THEN HER 90-DAY IVERMECTIN + FENBENDAZOLE STORY TOOK A DRAMATIC TURN
Irene was diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic cancer.
She was reportedly given only six months to live.
With little hope left, she reached out for help.
What followed was a 90-day journey involving Ivermectin + Fenbendazole, strong family support, and a follow-up CT scan that, according to the story, produced an extraordinary result.
📃 THE 90-DAY PROTOCOL
She was reportedly recommended a 90-day protocol that included:
💊 Ivermectin
💊 Fenbendazole
With strong support from her family, she followed the plan consistently.
Every step. Every day. For 90 days.
No shortcuts.
📊 THEN CAME THE CT SCAN
After completing the protocol, her husband encouraged her to get a CT scan.
According to the testimonial, that scan reportedly changed everything.
Her oncologist reportedly confirmed:
📊 No Evidence of Disease (NED)
📄 “CANCER-FREE”
❤️ FROM “SIX MONTHS” TO ENJOYING LIFE AGAIN
Today, Irene is described in the story as healthy and strong, enjoying life with her family again.
For supporters of repurposed-medicine research, stories like this are powerful because they raise an obvious question:
What happened?
Could an outcome like this potentially tell researchers something worth investigating?
⚡ BUT THERE'S AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION
This is a testimonial, not clinical evidence.
Individual cancer stories cannot establish that Ivermectin or Fenbendazole caused the reported outcome. Critics correctly point out that controlled clinical studies are needed to determine whether these medicines have meaningful effects in cancer.
Still, stories like Irene's continue to circulate online and generate intense discussion.
And one thing remains consistent across these conversations:
When people hear “Stage IV cancer” and “six months to live”...
They don't stop searching.
They start exploring every possible option.
That's why discussions around repurposed medicines continue to grow worldwide.
❓ THE QUESTION THIS STORY LEAVES BEHIND
If a reported 90-day protocol was followed by an NED result, should stories like this be investigated more rigorously in larger clinical trials?
That's the conversation worth having.
📌 SAVE & REPOST so others can review the story and draw their own conclusions.
💬 If a 90-day protocol was followed by this reported outcome, do you think it deserves deeper clinical investigation?
#Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerTestimony #Stage4Cancer #MedicalResearch #RepurposedDrugs #CancerResearch
When Elon Musk showed he’s a master of reverse psychology after someone asked, “Why should I invest in Tesla rather than Mercedes-Benz?
The Pandemics will end when the Pandemic Planners go to prison…
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
PENIKMAT MALAM
Seen from Indonesia
Ene
Seen from United States
MILF HUNTER
Seen from United Kingdom
هاشتاق السودان
Seen from Egypt
Gabriel Takeda
Seen from United States
。
Seen from Indonesia
Kamran Khan
Seen from Pakistan
Karrarin
Seen from United States
Sange ga si Lu ?
Seen from Indonesia
Ahome Martínez
Seen from Germany
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers