@gillman_ja48237@MensHumor You keep incorrectly using averages to describe housing and income. In the US, the extremes push the averages up far past the median i.e. the better metric to reflect the reality of most homebuyers and household earnings.
@gillman_ja48237@MensHumor 1) the situation was the very thing u posted in ur OP. Not your personal situation.
2) the median starting price is not $180k. Stop using averages to describe housing.
3) I didn't use averages. You did. It's the worst metric to use for housing. I use medians.
@gillman_ja48237@MensHumor I don't understand what any of these ad hominems or personal stories have to do with the substance of my point. It's a lot of dribble to say you aren't the norm? Which congrats but that doesn't address what the actual medians are in terms of income and home price.
@gillman_ja48237@MensHumor No. Average income is a ridiculous thing to use here. Median is preferred. I'm using approx percentages of households making over 100K to get a better view of the situation you suggested which leaves out a great number of American citizens.
@gillman_ja48237@MensHumor In your own situation, assuming a reasonable monthly debt of 600. Someone would need to make over 100K to live comfortably in that house. Note ~57% of households don't make that much here in the US.
๐ฐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ
1๏ธโฃ LIKE the post ! โค๏ธ
2๏ธโฃ RETWEET to add up your luck! ๐
3๏ธโฃ Drop #100T + your ๐ to activate your chance!
๐Gift for you: https://t.co/GHqbt2zmze
โฌ 6๐ ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐๐ง๐๐! https://t.co/hzLdPpasQh
@TheRealBobCan@Bigqadi This is true but the median would make more sense here and it would also showcase it taking more hours today vs then but definitely not to the degree the OP said.
Rebuild the ranch of your dreams, forge bonds with your horses, and befriend new Villagers as you saddle up for a new Disney adventure!
Tune-in for the full reveal on October 15!