@JanErik51430 Just getting through a four-month round myself. Cross-friction massage worked. Tons of videos out there. Didn’t do anything else, only this. Use two fingers (or your thumb) to press perpendicular (across the grain) to the direction of the tendon fibers, not along with them.
Just thinking out loud here. At $1.40 / share it seems like a buyback of 100mn shares ($140mn) makes a lot of sense for $OPEN .
If they truly believe the asset light model will replace 1P, they shouldn’t need over $900mn on the balance sheet and a buyback at these levels would prove their confidence a lot more in the Opendoor 2.0 model.
$OPEN top dogs don’t buy next week, I’m out. Not whining, no drama. It tells me sub-$1 price is inevitable. The “expecting” ANI positive storyline exiting 2026 was a major reason I’ve held. That’s gone. Forecasting is hard but no excuses @nejatian
@AndrewPRogerson@993tiptron@nejatian 100% agree. I want them to succeed. And huge improvements so far. But there will always be obstacles: big, small, generational (like we are seeing now). Up to them to adapt and overcome in every scenario. Families are counting on it.
@AndrewPRogerson@993tiptron@nejatian Wrong. Assumptions and forecasts were off. Shareholders i.e. owners of the company (Kaz own words) have every right to call this out. Keep them accountable. I’ve held stocks for 12 years. More than willing to do it again if they course correct in a timely manner. #faster right?
@BenLPatton The lack of any details about contribution margin in Q4 was also not cool. Kaz has been banging the drum about being open, transparent etc. - I just don't trust him anymore
As someone who’s lost seven figures on $OPEN, I’m feeling particularly disgusted (and stupid) today.
The Open House was a joke - especially the mostly irrelevant, scripted questions. They were frankly offensive to shareholders who actually want real, transparent answers on fundamental topics like contribution targets, the new ANI target, timelines for the nationwide 3P launch, etc.
And how is there still no mention of the warrants that expire in 13 days?
For the first time since I started investing in $OPEN, I don’t trust the leadership. I’m not selling, but in my head I’ve already written this off
@hsym786@nejatian Disagree. When he says shareholders literally own the company, lay out financial milestones they fail to meet and ask to be held accountable, silence is no help to shareholders or the company. Speak up. Oh and the maybe we’re a large investor, maybe we’re not thing doesn’t fly.
@BrianKehm@nejatian Waiting for the reverse split is my assumption. Why buy at a buck when they can buy at a nickel. Fewer shares, cheaper entry. Shareholders take the L but no one cares about that.
@993tiptron@nejatian Because you got rando investors out here with as many shares as the CEO has purchased in the open market. When they publicly announce expectations of being ANI positive exiting the year and can’t follow through, that’s a problem. They actually said hold them accountable.
Time to actually start producing. The blind faith and hopium are done. Why dodge how the various housing acts impact $OPEN; cherry-picking the easy questions during the open houses; leaving supporters wondering about warrants. I thought we literally owned the company? @nejatian
Be advised. $OPEN risk acknowledgment in the Q3 Form 10-Q regarding a potential classification as a "large institutional investor."
"...there can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a “large institutional investor” or other restricted entity." @nejatian
@MrAlwaysRugged@nejatian Be advised. They included a risk acknowledgment in the Q3 Form 10-Q regarding a potential classification as a "large institutional investor."
"...there can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a “large institutional investor” or other restricted entity."