Hey @theparadiselive πβ₯οΈ
Iβve been following you for 3 YEARS now, and ever since you launched your indicator, Iβve genuinely wanted to try it! π₯π
I mainly trade the Indian markets, and Iβm currently working towards growing my journey in the funded prop firm space. I truly believe your indicator could be a valuable addition to my trading toolkit and help me learn and refine my approach even further.
I know you have specific requirements for accessing the indicator, and I completely respect that. β€οΈ
Today, I just wanted to shoot my shot and ask β would you consider gifting me access as a giveaway? π₯Ήπ€
Being able to try something Iβve admired since its launch would genuinely mean a lot to me. Three years of following your journey, and hopefully one day, I get to share my own success story too! π
Much respect for what youβre building, bro. β€οΈπ
#traders #propfirm #tradersparadise
After a lot of struggle, finally made it! π
Just cleared the evaluation on my $50K Flash Account with @NYSMarkets@pakothawani and I paid the activation fee. Now officially moving to the FUNDED stage! π
This journey tested my patience, discipline, and risk management more than I expected. Definitely wasn't easy, but we got there. π
I've heard a lot of good things about NYS, and now it's time to experience the funded stage firsthand.
The real journey starts now. π
I'll be sharing my honest experience along the way β from trading conditions to payouts and everything in between.
Let's see how this journey unfolds. Hoping for a great long-term partnership! π€
One step at a time. One payout at a time. π°
@NYSMarkets@pakothawani@JeniferGomezNYS
#NYSMarkets #FundedTrader #TradingJourney
As a trader with a $25K account at @thefundedroom , I believe this deserves a serious discussion. π
I came across this case, where an account was reportedly failed because 9 out of 43 trades matched another traderβs symbol, direction and entry timing within 5 minutes.
Letβs be real: XAUUSD is one of the most widely traded instruments. Thousands of traders analyse the same charts, watch the same levels and sometimes enter the same direction within seconds.
Similar trades can raise a question, but do they automatically prove copy trading?
I completely support rules against coordinated trading and account mirroring. Prop firms have every right to protect the integrity of their programs.
But I also believe genuine traders deserve:
β’ Clear and transparent rules.
β’ Stronger, multi-factor evidence before an account is failed.
β’ A fair review and appeal process.
Perhaps entry and exit patterns, lot sizes, execution similarities and repeated behaviour should all be considered together, rather than relying heavily on a single time window.
@thefundedroom , this isn't an attack on the firm. It's constructive feedback from someone who also trades with you and wants to see the platform succeed.
A fair policy should catch actual copy trading without penalising independent traders who happen to take similar setups.
Fellow funded traders, do you think the current approach needs more clarity? Let's have a constructive discussion. π€
#PropFirm #FundedTrading #XAUUSD
π«‘ THIS is how a prop firm should handle community feedback.
I raised a genuine concern about a trader whose account was flagged for suspected copy trading at @thefundedroom .
My question was simple:
Can matching trades within a 5-minute window alone justify failing a traderβs account?
Instead of ignoring the concern, the firm's owner @harshalmadnani personally responded, took the time to explain the policy, and clarified how their verification process works.
Hereβs what I learned:
β Trade similarity isn't the only factor. The owner explained that an account isn't failed until there is both an identity match and a trade-idea match.
β The specific case had additional evidence. According to the explanation shared with me, the two accounts matched on phone number, KYC identity, and the exact trade idea.
β Transparency matters. Rather than leaving the community guessing, the owner explained the reasoning behind the decision and addressed my concern directly.
And honestly, I respect that.
As traders, we want prop firms to protect their programs against genuine copy trading and coordinated activity. At the same time, we want independent traders to be treated fairly.
Both things can β and should β go together.
What impressed me most wasn't just the explanation. It was the willingness to engage with a trader, clarify the rules, and address a concern instead of letting misunderstandings grow.
I raised the question publicly because I believed the policy deserved clarification. Now that I've received that clarification, I believe it's equally important to share the positive outcome publicly.
Credit where credit is due. π€
@thefundedroom@harshalmadnani , thank you for taking the time to explain the process and engage with the community.
Constructive criticism should be welcomed. Transparent responses should be appreciated. And when a company takes the time to address a genuine concern, that deserves recognition too.
The prop firm industry needs more open communication between firms and traders.
This is the kind of conversation that can build trust. β€οΈ
#PropFirm #FundedTrading #TradingCommunity