2026
The unanimous Declaration of the fifty united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political, financial, and strategic bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all nations are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Sovereignty, Security and the pursuit of National Interest.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Alliance becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Policies, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Alliances long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that nations are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of entanglements, influences, and dependencies, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under undue external sway, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such influence, and to provide new Guards for their future security.—Such has been the patient sufferance of these States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Foreign Policy. The history of the present influence of the State of Israel upon these United States is a history of repeated entanglements, pressures, and overreaches, all having in direct object the subordination of American sovereignty to foreign priorities. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. It has refused to respect the independent foreign policy most wholesome and necessary for the public good of the United States. It has forbidden or discouraged measures of immediate and pressing importance to American interests, unless suspended until its interests should be accommodated. It has refused to support policies for the accommodation of American security needs, unless the United States would relinquish aspects of its sovereign decision-making, a right inestimable to a free people. It has called together American legislators and officials, through various channels, at forums unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the true interests of the American people, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with its measures. It has influenced the dissolution or marginalization of independent voices repeatedly, for opposing with firmness its intrusions upon American priorities. It has obstructed the independent Administration of American Justice and policy, by exerting pressure against measures establishing clear boundaries. It has made American aid and support dependent on alignment with its Will alone, for the tenure of political favor and the amount and direction of assistance. It has erected a multitude of lobbying efforts, organizations, and influencers to harass our people, and consume our political substance. It has kept among us, through sustained campaigns, commitments and obligations without the full, ongoing consent of the governed. It has affected to render American military and intelligence assets subordinate in certain theaters. It has combined with others to subject us to strategic priorities foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our long-term interests. For entangling us in regional conflicts not of our choosing: For imposing financial and political costs upon us without proportional reciprocal benefit: For influencing narratives and discourse in ways that limit open debate: For transporting American treasure and support beyond our shores in service of its objectives: For seeking to expand its influence in ways that risk drawing us into broader confrontations: In every stage of these entanglements We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated concerns have been answered only by continued pressure. A foreign state whose influence is thus marked by every act which may define overreach is unfit to hold such sway over a free and sovereign people. Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our friends and allies. We have warned of the dangers of undue external influence from time to time. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our own founding as an independent republic. We have appealed to shared values and mutual respect. They too have at times been deaf to the voice of balanced partnership. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of the nations of the world, Friends in Peace, Sovereign Equals. We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these United States, solemnly publish and declare, That these United States are, and of Right ought to be, Fully Sovereign and Independent in their Foreign Relations with the State of Israel; that they are Absolved from all special strategic Entanglements, unconditional Aid obligations, and policy subordinations to it, and that all such exceptional political connection between them and the State of Israel, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as a Free and Independent Nation, the United States has full Power to levy its own Defense, conclude its own Alliances, contract its own Partnerships, establish its own Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Free and Sovereign States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Walmart and Kroger are quietly rolling out an internal store technology across America that could either modernize retail or bankrupt the middle-class family budget.
Starting across thousands of locations heading into 2027, traditional paper price tags are being ripped off grocery shelves and replaced with cloud-connected digital screens. Raise the price of bottled water by 20 percent the second the afternoon temperature hits 90 degrees. Surge the cost of ground beef, milk, and sandwich bread between 5 PM and 6 PM when exhausted commuters are rushing home from work. Drop prices at 10 AM on a Tuesday, then hike them right back up the minute the after-school crowd walks through the sliding doors.
Every price change happens wirelessly in seconds from a central corporate dashboard. No store employee has to touch a single shelf.
Walmart has already signed a massive deployment deal with VusionGroup to wire 2,300 American supercenters with EdgeSense digital shelf rails by 2027. Kroger is expanding its own Microsoft-backed system called EDGE across hundreds of supermarkets. Over 60 million digital price tags are already blinking on US grocery aisles right now.
This is not supply chain inflation. This is Uber-style surge pricing built directly into the shelves where Americans buy baby formula, eggs, and medicine.
Last week I sat down for coffee with a former retail pricing director who spent 14 years building supermarket margin algorithms before leaving the industry. What he shared over the table completely changed how I look at a grocery aisle.
"Retailers just turned static shelves into live stock tickers. The question is not whether grocery chains will use instant price changes, because they already spent billions installing the hardware. The question is how much extra money a family of four will lose every week simply because both parents work until 5 PM and cannot shop during off-peak hours."
Here is how the digital grocery pricing system actually works, how it tracks you in the aisle, and the exact phone settings and checkout playbook you need to beat it.
@BRICSinfo As well they should. It's idiotic for the U.S. to think a country isn't allowed to fight back. They got used to it by attacking countries that couldn't fight back. Now they bit off more than they can chew.
🌾 CONGRESS IS SLIPPING AMNESTY INTO A FARM LABOR BILL
Don't take my word for it. Read the official summary from the Congressional Research Service.
H.R. 9535, the "Securing Agriculture's Workforce Act." Sponsored by House Agriculture Chairman Glenn Thompson. 61 cosponsors, 52 of them Republicans.
One line tells you everything. The bill "establishes an H-2A visa pathway for current unauthorized agricultural workers who otherwise meet requirements."
Current unauthorized workers. People who are here illegally right now.
The sponsor's pitch: "With the border now secure, it is time to address these shortcomings."
The border is more secure because we finally started enforcing the law. You don't reward that by handing a visa to the people who broke it.
And the timing couldn't be worse. Monday night the President said, "We haven't put the same pressure on waitresses and on farmworkers, etc. Not even close." That's exactly the opening this bill's supporters have been waiting for.
We've seen this movie before. In 1986 Congress created the Special Agricultural Worker program, and it was riddled with fraud, with applicants claiming farm work they never did. My career taught me that every carve-out turns into a business model. Make farm work the safe lane and the fake employment letters will show up by the truckload.
Farmers have a real labor problem and I'm not dismissing it. Fix H-2A. Speed it up. Cut the red tape. Let it run year-round. That's legal labor and I'll support it.
But a visa for people who are here illegally isn't a workforce plan. It's amnesty in overalls.
Call your representative and ask one question: are you one of the 61?
@POTUS@StephenM@RealTomHoman@SecMullinDHS@ICEgov@HouseAgGOP@CongressmanGT@Jim_Jordan@JudiciaryGOP@Phase2Deport@NICEnforcement@itsyourgov
@Mikep29p22@Villgecrazylady@JDVance And where exactly is the proof of that? You're letting them get away with the "trust me bro" doctrine like they did with covid and many other things? That's why it's called extrajudicial because they haven't presented any proof
A lot of people talk about MKUltra, but almost nobody talks about its most relevant subproject right now- Subproject 119.
Tonight we’re getting into the government’s obsession with brain data, predictive reasoning, and how “national security” becomes a blanket justification for all of it.
I’m moving the live stream up an hour early to:
4 PM Pacific / 7 PM Eastern
(I’ll be living in Eastern Time for the next two months).
See you all tonight! https://t.co/FUsEoHzgsL
Incoming Rep. Don Leonard says top House Democrats have threatened to “make [his] life a living hell” and cost him re-election if he continues attaching conditions to his support for Hakeem Jeffries for speaker.
His conditions: 1) a vote on an amendment to end Citizens United and 2) “end U.S. support for the war in Iran and the country, Israel, that led us into it.”
He says Jeffries is refusing to meet with him and the threats are like something “out of a movie.”
@TyMasonD@redban If you've watched any of the behind the scenes episodes, the answer is most likely yes. He appears to be the most passive aggressive bitch I have ever seen
The Democrats impeached President Trump a second time and actually had a trial in the Senate when he was a private citizen. Therefore, I propose the impeachment of every past president who is still alive for military operations in which they never received a declaration of war -- impeach them all and try them all -- as this is the new standard. The same for every past, living SecDef and SecState.