¿Y si la literatura no fuera sino una televisión que uno mira para activar sus neuronas espejo y para proporcionarse a bajo coste los escalofríos de la acción? ¿Y si, peor aún, la literatura fuera una televisión que nos muestra aquello en lo que fracasamos?
Muriel Barbery
Según se informa, Totalplay no está funcionando para algunos usuarios en este momento. ¿Eres uno de ellos?
Totalplay is down for some users currently. Are you one of them? #TotalplayMX#Totalplay#TotalplayMXDown https://t.co/N5sbPzjHZF
Según se informa, Totalplay no está funcionando para algunos usuarios en este momento. ¿Eres uno de ellos?
Totalplay is down for some users currently. Are you one of them? #TotalplayMX#Totalplay#TotalplayMXDown https://t.co/N5sbPzjHZF
Lo que se hizo en Zapopan merece reconocimiento. Más de 250 mujeres de Etzatlán tejieron una obra monumental que hoy luce rumbo al Mundial 2026. Trabajo, talento, identidad y tradición mexicana. Quedó espectacular. Felicidades a quienes hicieron posible este proyecto.
In 1898, an Austrian physicist published a radical mathematical theory that claimed the entire universe was slowly, irreversibly ticking toward its own death.
The elite scientific establishment mocked him so relentlessly that he slipped into a deep depression and eventually took his own life.
Only a few years later, the world realized he was entirely right.
His name was Ludwig Boltzmann.
Today, his breakthrough formula is carved onto his tombstone in Vienna.
Yet outside of the physics community, almost no one understands the brutal, mind-bending philosophical truth he discovered about how our lives actually work.
In the late 19th century, physics was neat, orderly, and beautiful. Scientists believed that if you knew the exact position and velocity of every particle in the universe, you could predict the future perfectly.
The universe was a flawless clock.
Boltzmann looked at the world and realized that was an illusion.
He wanted to solve a deceptively simple riddle: Why does time only move forward? Why does a dropped coffee mug shatter into a hundred pieces, but a hundred scattered pieces never spontaneously jump back together to form a mug?
The laws of standard physics said it could happen. The math didn't forbid it.
So why didn't it?
Boltzmann realized the establishment was looking at the problem completely wrong. They were trying to track every single particle individually. It was an impossible formula.
Instead, Boltzmann decided to use probability and statistics. He stopped looking at individual atoms and started looking at the chaos of the crowd.
He invented a concept called Entropy, the mathematical measure of disorder.
His breakthrough was simple but devastating:
There is only one specific way for the atoms in your coffee mug to be perfectly arranged. But there are trillions of disordered ways for those same atoms to be scattered across the floor.
Things don’t break because the universe is malicious. They break because chaos is statistically overwhelming. Order is rare; disorder is infinite.
Boltzmann proved that the universe is constantly, inevitably moving from a state of low entropy (perfect order) to high entropy (maximum chaos). This cosmic slide toward disorder is the very reason time exists. The "arrow of time" is just the universe getting messier.
The professors of his day were furious. They hated his math because it relied on probability instead of certainty. They refused to believe that the fundamental laws of reality were governed by statistics.
But Boltzmann’s math laid the groundwork for quantum mechanics and explained the fate of the cosmos.
The philosophical lesson Boltzmann left behind is a cold, liberating truth for everyday life:
Order requires deliberate energy. Chaos is free.
Most people treat problems in their lives, a collapsing relationship, a chaotic career, a messy mind, as a sign of personal failure. They think they did something uniquely wrong.
But Boltzmann’s math proves that if you leave any system alone, it will naturally decay into chaos all by itself. Your room doesn't get messy because you are a bad person; it gets messy because the laws of physics dictate that there are infinitely more ways for your clothes to be on the floor than in the closet.
If you want to maintain order, sanity, or success in any area of your life, you cannot rely on things "just working out." The universe is actively trying to scramble your plans.
What is an area of your life right now that is sliding into chaos? Stop waiting for it to fix itself. Chaos is the default setting of the universe. What is the precise, deliberate energy you need to inject into that system today to fight back against the entropy?
Je suis la caresse du soleil
sur ta peau cuivrée de désir
Je suis les vagues
qui mordent la côte de Rufisque
Les pirogues qui rentrent chargées d’étoiles
Je suis tout ce qui respire
entre ton souffle et le mien
Je suis l’Afrique qui chante
quand tu m’appelles...
"Ojalá que cuando llegue el día, alguien me sostenga en su cariño, me perpetúe a través del afecto; será la prueba más honda de que no habré vivido en vano".
- Julio Cortázar
"Ni el amor, ni los encuentros verdaderos, ni siquiera los profundos desencuentros, son obra de las casualidades, sino que nos están misteriosamente reservados. ¡Cuántas veces en la vida me ha sorprendido cómo, entre las multitudes de personas que existen en el mundo, nos cruzamos con aquellas que, de alguna manera, poseían las tablas de nuestro destino, como si hubiéramos pertenecido a una misma organización secreta, o a los capítulos de un mismo libro! Nunca supe si se los reconoce porque ya se los buscaba, o se los busca porque ya bordeaban los aledaños de nuestro destino."
“La resistencia”, Ernesto Sábato
"Todos deberíamos disponer de alguien con quien poder hablar francamente. Por mucho valor que se tenga, uno se siente cada vez más solo".
Ernest Hemingway
Con la Línea 5 seguimos avanzando hacia una electromovilidad moderna y eficiente; muy pronto arrancaremos operaciones para conectar el Aeropuerto Internacional de Guadalajara con Mi Macro Periférico, Mi Macro Calzada y la Línea 1 del transporte público.
La universidad medieval evaluaba con exámenes orales. Evaluar es exigir que el conocimiento se interiorice. Si la IA reduce el esfuerzo, la universidad debe reintroducirlo de otra forma. La IA está forzando otro cambio: menos tareas en casa, más interacción directa, más conversación socrática.
The New York Times: Si la escritura “aceptable” se automatiza, la educación superior debe centrarse en pensamiento crítico, identidad intelectual y evaluación relacional https://t.co/sBg3M1cwcF https://t.co/SAItfb3rGY
Edgar Morin :
«le problème n’est pas que vous soyez illettré..
Le problème ,c’est que vous êtes suffisamment instruit pour croire ce qu’on vous a enseigné ,mais pas assez pour remettre en question tout ce qu’on vous a dit »