cutie pie cheesecake

Just love to say the truth and not often on Twitter #freedomtospeak #britishroyalwatcher #britishroyalfamilylover #thewalesbigfans ❤️

[🇬🇧W🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿C @akhnifas_ameytr]

🪞🪽🩰

[Lady C @LadyColinCampb]

It is gratifying as well as amusing to see how the media are finally jumping on the bandwagon I rolled out the other day, as a result of DEMOCRATS in the US informing me on the 12th August that on the 11th the Feds had concluded that the disparities between Harry's assertions in Spare contradicted his visa application, and there was now the danger that his visa would be cancelled owing to those disparities. This would put him in danger of arrest as well as deportation, and I made the point that, if I was now privy to this information, so too had to be The King and Harry.

Meghan and Harry have got themselves into a real mess. She is LOATHED in both Republican and Democrat circles. Neither party wants to have anything to do with either of them and her overweening ambitions are viewed with even greater horror by the Democrats, who are determined that this cheap and vulgar hustler won't get a toehold politically as a result of the misguided manipulations she has exhibited eleewhere, all of which result in chaos, confusion and destruction.

Thank God the media have now interviewed Nile Gardner of the Heritage Foundation following all the claptrap the British press were running with about the move back here.

What is particularly concerning to me, as a proud Jamaican, is how the Jason Arday tragedy, which is already being unfairly expoilted under the racial banner, is slowly but surely being encroached upon to further Meghan's untrue claims of having somehow been a victim of British racism. In fact, if the Arday matter proves anything, it is that there is more pro- than anti- black racism in this country, for there is no way that a white professor or a white American duchess, who had fabulated the way those two did, would've got away with their fantastical claims for the length of time they did.

[Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧 @QLoTII]

Are you wondering why much of the world HATES Meghan Markle?

Walk with me!

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have perfected the art of the perpetual victim narrative: everything is always someone else’s fault, the world is uniquely cruel to them, and any scrutiny is “racism,” “bullying,” or “the institution.” The result is a masterclass in self-sabotage dressed up as noble suffering.

Start with the relationships. Meghan’s pre-Harry romantic history included a short-lived marriage that ended in divorce. Harry’s own past was a revolving door of high-profile girlfriends who somehow never quite measured up until the California actress arrived with her ready-made script of destiny and destiny’s obstacles. Once married, the pair rapidly framed the entire British royal family and media as the villains in their personal fairytale. Every disagreement became institutional cruelty; every boundary became oppression. The public spectacle of airing private grievances on Oprah, in Spare, and across multiple interviews turned family friction into global content—while insisting they only wanted privacy. The irony writes itself: the people who fled “the Firm” for freedom have spent years monetizing their grievances against it.

Then the claims that invited fact-checking. The Oprah interview delivered a string of explosive assertions—about titles, security, skin color concerns regarding their unborn child, and treatment inside the palace—many of which were later walked back, contextualized differently by other parties, or left without corroboration that satisfied skeptics. Harry’s memoir added more intimate details and scores to settle. Critics noted the selective memory: the same couple who accepted lavish wedding support, titles, and public resources later portrayed themselves as trapped outsiders. When contradictions surfaced (or when other royals and former staff offered different accounts), the response was rarely “we may have overstated”; it was usually that the critics were part of the problem.

Business ventures have been a particular highlight reel of hype meeting reality. The Spotify deal for Archewell Audio produced a thin slate of episodes before the partnership quietly ended; the platform’s executives were reported to have been underwhelmed. Netflix brought glossy projects and mixed critical/commercial returns. Archewell itself has faced repeated questions about transparency, grant-making pace, and how much tangible impact matched the branding. Meghan’s lifestyle and product forays (including the more recent As Ever line) have drawn the usual influencer-adjacent skepticism: heavy on aspirational imagery, lighter on sustained commercial dominance.

The pattern is familiar—announce big, claim pioneering status, then treat any underperformance as evidence of external sabotage rather than market judgment or execution gaps.

Throughout, the default posture remains the same: if a deal falters, the media or “the institution” undermined it; if public opinion sours, it is coordinated hate rather than fatigue with the endless grievance tour; if family members decline to play along with the preferred narrative, they are the dysfunctional ones. Personal agency and the consequences of choosing global publicity over discretion are rarely centered. Reasonable observers notice the mismatch between the self-presentation as reluctant celebrities forced into the spotlight and the energetic pursuit of platforms, book advances, production deals, and brand opportunities that keep them squarely in it.

The cumulative effect is that a large segment of the public has moved past curiosity into active irritation. Not because of skin color or gender, but because the continuous cycle of accusation, monetization, and deflection has worn thin. When every setback is framed as proof of unique persecution, and every success is claimed as hard-won against impossible odds, people eventually stop giving the benefit of the doubt.

[The British Prince @freedom_007__]

Trust me on this: if any of my siblings had publicly attacked me with lies, tried to ruin my life, attacked my partner while they had cancer, attacked my family while my grandparents were dying, and released a Netflix show and book attacking everything my grandparents built just months after my grandmother died, I would cut them off and protect myself and my family.

Hell would have to freeze over before I’d let our children have a playdate.

Are you mad? You’re toxic.

You’ll teach your children to be toxic, and I don’t trust you—so I’m not having any of your negativity around my happy, emotionally stable children and my partner (The Princess of Wales) who is in remission.

I wasn’t the one who decided not to take the millions and go live a decent private life.

It was you Prince Harry and Meghan Markle who chose to create a smear campaigns, false narratives and blatant lies because you wanted to harass and bully the family to get what you wanted (half in half out)

You chose this path, so now you have to deal with the consequences.

Many people have cut off toxic family members for far less than what The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have done over the last six years.

Prince William is protecting his family, his mental health, and the future of the Royal Family.

Harry is fuming that Wills continues to ignore him and that he has absolutely no access to the future King and Queen and their children.

William, Catherine, George, Charlotte and Louis are at Balmoral with family members they trust and with whom they have built a loving, peaceful relationship.

As they have done for the past six years, they will ignore the the Sussex circus, media’s nonsense and, keep calm, and carry on with their duties on behalf of the King and country.

Stay strong, Wills—the majority of people support whatever you decide is best for your family.

You are simply doing what any mature, decent, and wise man, husband, father, son, and grandson would do.

[Theresa Longo Fans @BarkJack_]

6. Notice in any/ALL of my posts, did I NOT confirm or deny - without a shred of a doubt - that they have purchased anything…

nor that shall actually “move permanently”

more likely, they shall “maintain a residence” in some form or fashion.

question sensational headlines!

[Theresa Longo Fans @BarkJack_]

5. All summer long I have been reporting on (our followers know!) meetings between high level security & Officials.

[Theresa Longo Fans @BarkJack_]

All I know about the Harkles returning to UK‼️ (I’ve been asked to write this post).

1. All Megxit conditions still stand. No going back. No half in half out. No being photographed alongside Sr. Royals on duty.

2. Issues between M&H are plenty. They constantly argue about direction, communications and business endeavors. Massive source of contention.

3. Serious question mark on Harkles 2nd born which requires further investigation. Harkles asked to voluntarily do this to satisfy this query. Public optics mean nothing, long term defensibility of The Crown is everything.

Given #3; it is therefore suspected NO ONE was blind sided by this. It is fully expected they volunteer to be investigated fully on UK soil.

4. Harkles have been told, treat all grandparents equally/ fairly or don’t expect similar grace and favor!

[MeghansMole©️ @MeghansMole]

What did Meghan Markle say about the British Royal Family being RACIST

Let me refresh your memory

[Mariana - The Edinburghs Fan Account @Mari_Edinburghs]

✨A lovely video to brighten up our day ❤️: The Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh with The Prince and Princess of Wales

Loyal, respectful and and beautiful royal couples! I am sure Uncle Edward and Aunt Sophie are of great support to William and Carherine

[Minerva @jonsaagenda]

Cleansing your timelines. We love you William, we do. 😙 ♥️ 🤴

[⛈️ 🍵 Nina aka HRH Back Row Betty @nolink29]

Crying Are my babies safe ? But returns to a country she called racist with her babies 🤔🤔. Fking Hypocrite !!

[Royal News Network @RNN_RoyalNews]

It's the worst-case scenario for Prince Harry and the other co-claimants in their case against The Daily Mail.

The judge has ordered that the co-claimants pay an initial payment of £9,544,355 by August 28 for the Daily Mail's costs. But that's not the worst of it.

In a devastating blow, the judge has determined that there will be no limit on the recoverable costs. This is due to the “exceptional breadth” and “gravity” of the accusations from Harry, Elton John and the other co-claimants, which “lacked an adequate evidential foundation”. The Daily Mail can now seek all of its costs, to the tune of £34.4 million, and this does not even account for potential damages.

Harry and the other co-claimants have insurance coverage of only £16.2 million, leaving them £18 million short. While some have a couple of million lying around, that is not the case for everyone, especially Baroness Lawrence. It has been suggested that Harry will cover the costs for Baroness Lawrence, or that Elton John will cover everyone's costs, but now that the push comes to shove, will someone step up to take the fall, or will they all fight among themselves over who has to pay what?

Either way, this was a case that Harry was going to lose and, as the judge rightly pointed out, when an allegation fell apart it should have been removed before the case ever went to trial.

Harry claimed this case was about accountability, but it was really about wanting to silence one of the biggest critics of him and his wife by dragging up old stories from decades ago and trying to make a correlation to now. This testosterone-devoid man even cried on the stand about how "they've made my wife's life a misery, my lord."

Now the only person whose life is miserable is Prince Harry and those he coerced into this flimsy case as they face a massive legal bill and the public embarrassment of being tied to this fiasco.

https://t.co/vWRfUlFhju

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@XOQueenEsther Excellent 👏👏👏

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@saadsalman719 Hello, I know you have a deep understanding of the UK royal family. Could you explain why Catherine and Camilla didn't use the Family Order of the Late Queen Elizabeth II? And is it okay not to use this order? Please answer this because I'm very curious about this 🙏

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@Canellelabelle Meghan never had 175 cm height @Canellelabelle .. she is just 168 cm, it's from Wikipedia 🙌

But when we see her pictures on the internet, she has same height as Kim Kardashian 😅

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@QLoTII Yeah.. this is correct 🤣🤣🤣

I’m not read all the story, just one paragraph make me wanna vomit 🤢 🤮 because too much word salad 🤦‍♀️

But yeah my great eyes can get that part of sentences 🤣

She will more mad maybe if she lost this title, Meghan the desperate of Royal 😬

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@BarkJack_ Amal Clooney holds her grandfather with a cringe-worthy smile 🤦‍♀️

Oh George.. you look so old 😮‍💨

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@sage1411 It's always failed for her to clean her lies, because she always forgot what she said before 🙄

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@RobinLynnKing2 Who’s Meghan?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
She thinks Taylor overshadowed her is so delusional 🤣🤣

Nobody knows Meghan but every person in this world knows Taylor Swift 😅😅

I just noticed this news is trying to make her relevant by using Taylor's name?? 😮‍💨😮‍💨

[cutie pie cheesecake @Purple25Pie]

@unreMARKLEble Creppy 😮😮😮

Cannot stand to see this video again coz she makes my hairs on the back of my neck stand up 😱😱