@DealerHunters @DunlapBrian5 @ScottishSiren13@notlloomer81@CaptainSirk1@AlissaWalsh21 I just kept to my point. Which is abortion is a decision up to the pregnant woman.
You say don't get pregnant, if you don't want to be pregnant.
I say don't get an abortion, if you don't like abortion.
All very simple concepts really.
@kaya_masters@JackieFrancesca@PolitiBunny Yes it is. Non viable pregnancy that would kill both the mother and the ZEF if given the chance to grow.
Either way you are eliminating a latched embryo. You are still terminating a pregnancy. Even if it is a non-viable one. You are still performing an abortion.
Men make pregnancies happen. Women don’t just walk around and boom, we are pregnant. I think it’s time you start to control your fucking sperm, don’t you?
@Handyman751@StudentsforLife Irrelevant unaborted pregnancies are not in danger of being aborted. All because they are born. Abortion is only possible in pregnancy.
@DunlapBrian5 @CaptainSirk1@DealerHunters@AlissaWalsh21 You are the one creating the hypothetical that is non existent.
I have proven there is plenty of ways for an infant to survive without the mother.
Which is not possible for a fetus in utero.
@cuchalain@OliveOwl6@melJsaysso @GOPisBankrupt The fact it can be used in multiple ways proves it is a useless term to use in an abortion conversation.
@cuchalain@melJsaysso @GOPisBankrupt @OliveOwl6 I don't think the term baby has any real foundation in an abortion conversation. It's not expanding the definition.
@DunlapBrian5 @CaptainSirk1@DealerHunters@AlissaWalsh21 I know I did, to prove a person who chooses not to sign the waiver. Can say they didn't consent to possible risks of an activity or situation.
@DunlapBrian5 @CaptainSirk1@DealerHunters@AlissaWalsh21 This is consistency, because an infant can be transferred to a person that can provide the necessity they need. An infant doesn't need to sustain life from just it's bio mom. Just another willing human to care for them.