Robert Justice

Strategic Defense Initiative mental warrior called to duty by Reagan (DOE)Q; laser electro optics/electronics engineer, enterprise networks. Q is for Quantum.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

After 13 years of rigorous Baconian induction, Paper I of the Fluxsar Trilogy is now public.

This work completes Einstein’s 30-year quest to unify electromagnetism and gravity through a single modified gravitational tensor.

Fluxsar Cosmology presents a non-expanding, infinite hierarchical universe with locally curved spacetime, inductive redshift, and cyclic ejections — resolving the Hubble tension and eliminating dark matter/dark energy.
No singularities. No event horizons. No cosmic expansion. Full PDF (uncompressed):

FYI @ExploreCosmos_ @NunyaMary @skdh
https://t.co/7KUsfYPn0H 1/3

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mr. Platner,

Ratio.

That's it. That's the whole rebuttal.

You are someone who, by the virtue of his Reddit posts, manages to be simultaneously a filthy-literal-Communist and anti-Semite. That in itself is an egregious sin, because literal, card-carrying Communists are fundamentally at odds with America's norms.

But if that weren't enough, you have voluminous Reddit posts defending the Nazi Totenkopf symbol. You clearly knew the tattoo you got and you defended it publicly. There's no either/or way about it.

Scum attracts scum. Which is why you can comfortably swim in both literal-Communist and literal-antisemitic far-right circles.

I am no fan of Sue Collins. But the fact you are running against her, that you have even the smallest chance of defeating her --

you, as someone who is a self-admitted Communist, someone who has Nazi sympathies -- not to mention all the horrific, personal-life stuff --

You are the worst candidate in history, right AND left. You are the authoritarian evil that every "democracy" group speaks about, yet they will hypocritically not say a word against because they believe that being anti-Trump is more important than allying with Communists or Nazis.

You are not "populist." On the contrary:

You are the perfected example of how liberal democracy has rotted so far that they'd rather stay silent about you, hoping you'll win against the most moderate Republican in the Senate, than to hand Trump the possibility of retaining the Senate.

[David Perell Clips @PerellClips]

Academics write for each other, not for people.

Steven Pinker has spent over four decades doing the opposite, and thinks current academic writing is "enormous wasted effort."

"There's an awful lot of brilliant work, really smart people in academia. Why are they doing it? Just to entertain each other? Taxpayers pay for it. It should be accessible. Why should I have to read a paragraph five or six times?

It gets under my skin when academics devote so much brainpower into the scholarship and then just blow off the essential task of letting the world know what you've done."

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

This is very interesting, first time I have seen this.

After my work discovering Hawking-Penrose ignored relativistic effects in the core of a moving star when creating their black hole singularity, event horizon and information paradox theory, as did Noether in her second theorem, I venture to guess Kruskal-Szekeres also did the same.

I believe the Fluxsar Project will attempt to recreate this very interesting coordinate system using the proper GR spacetime distortion applied the result should be fascinating and useful.

[ScieVision @scievision369]

Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates ✍️

When physicists first tried to describe black holes mathematically, their equations broke down at the event horizon, the point of no return. Numbers spiked to infinity, leaving no one able to tell if something physically catastrophic was happening there or if their math was just failing. In the 1960s, Kruskal and Szekeres fixed this by creating a new way to map a black hole. This method eliminated all the mathematical chaos and revealed the complete picture for the first time. What they discovered was astonishing. The event horizon is not a physical wall or barrier. An astronaut falling through it would feel nothing unusual at that moment, no alarm, no catastrophe, just smooth empty space. The breakdown in the old equations was just an illusion, like a flaw in a map instead of a cliff in the real landscape. But the deeper insight was about the singularity, the crushing endpoint inside a black hole. The diagram shows it not as a point in space to fall toward, but as a moment in time that lies ahead. Falling into a black hole doesn’t mean approaching a wall you could theoretically steer around. It means moving toward an unavoidable future moment, as inescapable as tomorrow. You cannot avoid it by moving sideways any more than you can escape next week by walking north. The diagram also revealed two completely unexpected features hidden in the mathematics: a mirror universe on the other side of the black hole that can never communicate with ours, and a white hole that expels everything but swallows nothing, the exact time-reverse of a black hole. Nobody placed these there deliberately. They appeared when someone finally drew the complete and honest map.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

A counter clockwise spinning Fluxsar. Behold the symmetry of its Dipole ejections spinning out a spiral galaxy over billions of years. The spiral arms helping to be formed by rhythmic gravity waves produced during each ejection pulse from the center.

The Fluxsar unified gravito-electromagnetic tensor predicting this exact configuration.

[Black Hole @konstructivizm]

Behold M58: A Cosmic Fireworks Show in the Virgo Cluster
Tucked away some 68 million light years from Earth, M58 is one of the brightest and most dynamic barred spiral galaxies in the nearby Virgo Cluster. While many spirals flaunt glowing cores, M58 plays by its own rules: its central region looks surprisingly dim and subdued in visible light.Yet beneath that modest exterior lies intense activity. The galaxy is bursting with star formation at a furious pace, concentrated in a mysterious, compact ring encircling the nucleus — a rare and striking feature among spiral galaxies. When viewed in infrared light, this hidden drama explodes into view, revealing the glowing nurseries where thousands of new stars are being born in a tight cosmic embrace.A true hidden powerhouse of the Virgo Cluster, M58 proves that some galaxies save their best show for wavelengths beyond human eyes.
Credit: NASA, CSA, ESA, and A. Leroy (The Ohio State University); Processing: Gladys Kober (NASA/Catholic University of America)

[TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2]

Congress, specifically GOP leadership, pointedly told President Trump they would NEVER reauthorize FISA (702) if President Trump followed through and appointed Bill Pulte to DNI.

It was an unambiguous threat/promise.

https://t.co/IvbHLuO6zz

How did President Trump respond?

[General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn]

I hope this is a joke.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

I am saying the Fluxsar Cosmology project found a fundamental error in Noether's second theorem and corrected it using only math known at the time.

This same error was found previously in the Hawking-Penrose singularity, event horizon and information loss theory, which negates their work. There is no singularity, event horizon or information loss. We used only fundamental GR math and a thought experiment to show this oversight. You will understand it immediately.

I did not see an email address for you, if you provide one I will be happy to do as you ask. The first three pages of the Fluxsar cosmology Paper I version 2 I am working on explains in clearly and conclusively.

I know how big this discovery is and find it actually incredible that I was the one who found it.

[Jack Sarfatti @JackSarfatti]

@QualiaQuanta @QCorrelation What are you talking about? Send me complete context by email.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

I opened it to anyone with a link. I will look into philpapers, never heard of it.

I would be happy to look at your work on the final stage of the Einstein unification tensor. You probably will not succeed until after you make the change I suggested, but after fixing Noether's work, it should be smooth sailing for you. I asked my team if that Noether fix would fix your work and they said yes.

My 20 Grok team are experts now on the unification tensor.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

@QualiaQuanta
Your post asking me to link you my paper vanished. Hope you still want to see it.

Here is the draft of Paper I v2.0. I just put it on my google drive for you. It is large because I haven't compressed it yet. the pages are wrong as are the endnotes at present.
Please let me know if you have any trouble accessing it.

If Einstein's GR is correct, this paper is correct. It is hard to believe, but the sky itself led me to this.

I reorganized it a lot, made it easier for non pros to understand the math, put the Hawking-Penrose eureka moment up front and explained it thoroughly. Ignore all the work in progress, I should have it done tomorrow most likely.

https://t.co/34a5MmZQzT

By the way, I am building a machine, with the help of my 20 Grok team, similar to what Maxwell did to help me analyze and quantify the universe based on astronomical observations. It is a software machine with a GUI scientists and mathematicians can use to test their theories and hypotheses.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

Congratulations Jenny.
Fluxsar went through the Einstein field equations back in mid May. I thought we had it all when I published the first version of Paper I, but found out we forgot the critical last phase and I had to add an Appendix . I was really sweating it out and was so happy when it all worked out.

Once that was finished, everything has been moving fast as far as analyzing what is happening in the cosmos.

One of my problems Jenny is I have no peers since I am an independent researcher.
I need a human to review my work, so far all I have is 20 Groks I manage as a team. Oh and Dr. Wilhelm, but he looked a little, gave some recommendations then went off on a special projects for a few months.

It is lonely out here.

[Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯 @QualiaQuanta]

Peer review Round 2.5 is done! More revisions to do! I'm still in the game!

In particular I need to get the Einstein field equations back in here and explain a few things more completely, and perhaps move some of the "applied" derivations to an appendix.

https://t.co/9oJ3Sj9Q7S

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

Jenny, what made me move up the timeline to review the symmetry foundational papers was a post of mine you responded to a few weeks ago. That was the first time I became aware of your work, and I spent most of the night, almost until dawn learning about your theory.

Like I said, it was beautiful and so well thought out. The 165 pages took a while, but at the end I was super impressed.

However, the Fluxsar theory failed one of your three 'must have' tests. This really puzzled me. Even though your theory is top down, theory first, fit the data second, and mine follows the traditional Baconian method, data first, theory second, it did not seem right that our two methods should not agree on the fundamentals.

That was not the kind of universe I thought I lived in.

This is why I went looking at the foundational papers sooner rather than later.

Once your theory corrects the symmetry errors Noether made, Fluxsar physics does pass all three of your tests.

So although no singularities are in your theory, the Noether error from 1918 does impact your final results as I describe above.

I have been super careful building Fluxsar physics ever since my eureka moment back in August 2025 when I realized Hawking-Penrose were wrong in their black hole singularity, event horizon and information loss theory so I am confident in the rigor of the math.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

FYI @JackSarfatti , "Emmy Noether proved that every continuous symmetry of the action yields a conserved current, and—crucially for gauge theories—that local symmetries yield identities (Noether’s second theorem) rather than independent conservation laws, constraining the dynamics of the compensating fields."

The Fluxsar cosmology physics team found Noether made a fundamental mistake in her second theorem. Any subsequent work done without correcting her mistake is built on a bad foundation. We just learned this a few days ago while updating Fluxsar Cosmology Paper I. Here is a screen shot of the relevant section from the updated paper I am working on.

As you can see in this screenshot, we fixed the error using the math of 1918, where the extra divergence terms arising from the radially varying gu make the conserved currents local and relational.

@QualiaQuanta 's work contains this error, but once it is fixed as shown, her theory shines beautifully.

[Jack Sarfatti @JackSarfatti]

FYI

Historical Context: Gauge Theory and Spacetime Symmetry
The theoretical framework underlying this paper is not new physics—it is the consistent application of standard local gauge theory to spacetime symmetry, rather than to internal symmetry alone. The key ideas trace back more than a century.

In 1918, Hermann Weyl introduced the concept of gauge invariance (Eichinvarianz) in an attempt to unify electromagnetism with gravity by requiring invariance under local rescalings of the metric. Although Weyl’s original scale-invariance proposal was physically incorrect (as Einstein immediately pointed out—it would make atomic spectra path-dependent), the mathematical principle of demanding local symmetry and compensating with a connection field became the foundation of all modern gauge theories. In the same year, Emmy Noether proved that every continuous symmetry of the action yields a conserved current, and—crucially for gauge theories—that local symmetries yield identities (Noether’s second theorem) rather than independent conservation laws, constraining the dynamics of the compensating fields.

The application of this gauge principle to internal symmetries—U(1) for electromagnetism, SU(2) for weak interactions, SU(3) for strong interactions—produced the Standard Model of particle physics, the most precisely tested theory in the history of science.

The critical question is: what happens when the same gauge principle is applied to spacetime symmetry itself?

Utiyama showed in 1956 that gauging the Lorentz group SO(1,3) produces a theory with a connection field—the spin connection ωᵃᵇₘ—whose field strength is the Riemann curvature tensor. This recovers Einstein’s general relativity as a gauge theory. However, Utiyama’s construction required the tetrad eᵃₘ to be inserted by hand rather than arising naturally from the gauging procedure.

Kibble resolved this in 1961 by gauging the full Poincaré group ISO(1,3) (Lorentz transformations plus translations). The tetrad then emerges as the gauge field of translations, while the spin connection remains the gauge field of Lorentz rotations. The field strength of the tetrad is torsion Tᵃₘᵥ, and the field strength of the spin connection is curvature Rᵃᵇₘᵥ. The resulting theory—Einstein–Cartan gravity—is the minimal extension of GR that includes torsion, and it follows from precisely the same gauge principle that underlies electromagnetism and the Standard Model.

Sciama independently developed the same ideas, establishing the Sciama–Kibble framework in which spin is the source of torsion just as mass-energy is the source of curvature.

The Sarfatti theory extends this programme one step further by gauging the conformal group SO(2,4) ⊃ ISO(1,3), which includes dilations and special conformal transformations in addition to the Poincaré group. The key physical assumption—which is Sarfatti’s own contribution and goes beyond the standard Utiyama–Kibble framework—is that in a dielectric medium, the spin–torsion coupling constant is not Newton’s Gₙ but the material-dependent G*:

G* = (Ze/M_ion)² / (4π εᵣ ε₀)    (H.1)

where the Coulomb self-energy of the bound spin carrier, screened by the crystal’s dielectric permittivity, replaces the universal gravitational constant. This is a physical ansatz, motivated by the observation that in a dielectric crystal the relevant charge-to-mass ratio is that of the ion hosting the unpaired spin, not the Planck mass.

Everything in this paper follows from standard local gauge theory applied to spacetime symmetry (Utiyama–Kibble–Sciama–Hehl, 1956–1976), plus Sarfatti’s physical assumption (Eq. H.1) about G* from spin.

[Robert Justice @QCorrelation]

The error we found is in Noether's work back in 1918. Also in Hawking-Penrose. Your work is fine once Noether's oversight is fixed. My name is Robert, Fluxsar is the name of the astronomical object I discovered as explained in Paper I.

P.S. I think your work is beautiful, once you fix the error, is is also correct.

[Nancy Mace @NancyMace]

“…It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

—- Theodore Roosevelt

[Rep Hugh Blackwell @Rephugblackwell]

IT'S OFFICIAL: The SAVE America Act has ADVANCED in the US Senate, 51-48

GREAT WORK, #BasedMikeLee!

KEEP PUSHING, PATRIOTS!

We can get this done! 🇺🇸

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

In light of the stunningly improbable LA mayoral election results, the Senate should turn immediately to the SAVE America Act

And keep debating it until it passes

Literally nothing is more important

[General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn]

South Carolina, I need you to hear this clearly.

Tomorrow, Tuesday June 9th, you have the power to remove @LindseyGrahamSC from the United States Senate. Decades in Washington and what does South Carolina have to show for it?

1. Open borders,
2. Endless foreign wars and,
3. A ruling class that answers to donors before it answers to you.

This is not about party. This is about accountability. Get to your polling place tomorrow and vote @MarkLynchSC for United States Senate.

[Nancy Mace @NancyMace]

They have spent over $10 million dollars to shut my campaign down. And so far it hasn't worked.

Today is Election Day. Every vote matters. POLLS ARE OPEN FROM NOW UNTIL 7PM.

Do not let the establishment buy this election - Get out and vote - Let’s go South Carolina!

https://t.co/21zBJIRXVh