@AIDRIVR@AIDRIVR Please go on to explain how wonderful this software is, so good in fact that the people who worked on it say that they’ve seen it fail or don’t trust it. Another said he would not ride in a Tesla robotaxi “if you fucking paid me.”
https://t.co/iGtbyYEv9D
@AIDRIVR@reed If your standard is based on being able to purchase a car equipped with software that a former self driving engineer said “We have all seen it fail.” not one, two or, three but SEVEN data labelers say “I don’t trust the software.” That’s HORRIBLE
https://t.co/iGtbyYEv9D
@AIDRIVR What’s your evidence that it wouldn’t have been a close call in this scenario? Did you test it in this exact scenario? What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
@wholemars That’s not true, here’s a three things Waymo did first.
1. Level 4 autonomous vehicle traveled on public roads with a passenger and no human intervention.
2. Commercial self-driving car service.
3. Company to offer unmonitored autonomous rides to anyone who downloaded the app.
@ateyourfractal@Waymo@GoogleDeepMind@grok Starting with an all caps “YES” or “NO” is the claim that “all vehicles are remotely controlled operators in the Phillippines” true within the context of this post. Cite sources and provide direct links.