'MIT studied participants’ brains over four months as they wrote essays under three conditions: unaided, with search engines or with AI assistants.
The results were stark.
AI users showed the weakest connectivity of all three groups, indicating they were barely engaged. By the third session, they had essentially outsourced the entire writing process.
When later asked to write without AI, they remembered little of their own earlier essays and showed weaker brain activity associated with deep memory encoding.
Most strikingly, 83 per cent of the AI users couldn’t provide a single correct quote from essays they had written just minutes earlier. The effort that builds durable learning had been bypassed entirely.'
Latest from Baillie Gifford...
https://t.co/i9rdAVjjLM
$ASML CEO on DeepSeek vs OpenAI: "You cannot have an industry with this amount of opportunity without the key player being, I would say, challenged. You will see a lot more of these discussions happening in the next few months or years. So, if I make it short...it's good news"
"NIST has extended the standardization process ... to study algorithms that are not lattice-based. “Our goal in this is not to depend on any one mathematical family for the algorithms we select,” explains Dustin Moody, a mathematician at NIST.
https://t.co/RhASjv5NlR
I wonder if $BNTX decided to go after $MDGEF PRAME TCR after seeing $IMTX success last year. As I said then: developers of other PRAME-directed projects will be taking note https://t.co/rmen0PZxC9