Mon message aux jeunes, hier, était clair.
Si vous avez de la difficulté à quitter le sous-sol de vos parents, si vous hésitez à fonder une famille parce que vous n’en avez tout simplement plus les moyens, ou si vous avez fait de longues études sans réussir à trouver un bon emploi, ce n’est pas de votre faute.
C’est la faute de gens de ma génération qui ont trop souvent tenté d’acheter la prochaine élection en refilant la facture à la prochaine génération.
Aujourd’hui, on frappe le mur contre lequel je mets en garde depuis trente ans.
Mais la bonne nouvelle, c’est que ce n’est pas une fatalité. On peut redresser la situation. On peut redonner aux jeunes les mêmes possibilités qu’aux générations précédentes : devenir propriétaires, fonder une famille, trouver un bon emploi et bâtir leur avenir.
Mais pour y arriver, il va falloir oser faire les choses autrement. Pour vrai.
Derrière chaque déclaration de Christine Fréchette, il y a François Legault.
❌ La même ��quipe de ministres incompétents.
❌ La même vision interventionniste qui a appauvri les Québécois plus que les autres Canadiens.
❌ La même vision monopolistique du système de santé, responsable des pires listes d’attente.
❌ La même vision bureaucratique qui étouffe nos entrepreneurs et endette les prochaines générations.
❌ La même vision individualiste et conflictuelle qui fait reculer le français au Québec, et le Québec dans le Canada.
J’ai quelques questions pour vous, Mme Fréchette : étiez-vous au courant du devis technique gardé secret depuis six mois? Hier, vous avez reçu l’appui de SOPREMA, l’entreprise qui a réalisé les travaux sur la membrane du pont Pierre-Laporte en 2021. Avez-vous discuté de ce dossier avec ses représentants? Combien ces nouveaux travaux coûteront-ils aux contribuables?
Au lieu de faire preuve de transparence et d’informer la population, vous rencontrez cette entreprise en pleine campagne électorale pour obtenir son appui.
Les gens de Québec sont à boutte. Ils sont pris dans le trafic tous les jours, et voilà qu’on apprend qu’ils devront encore subir des entraves majeures, comme en 2021, dans les prochaines semaines et les prochains mois.
Qu’avez-vous à cacher, Mme Fréchette?
La CAQ dehors point final ⚜️
🔴 Arrêtons de recycler les mêmes déceptions (CAQ PLQ PQ)
💙 Il est temps de voter PCQ!
🔴 Ne restez pas spectateurs : aimez, commentez et partagez pour faire avancer le débat ! ⚜️
#polqc#PCQ#JeVotePCQ#OserPourVrai#PQ#CAQ#PLQ
Looks like @CanadianForces & @MarkJCarney will have to answer why a member of a foreign terrorist organization inside the Canadian military attacked American citizens in a church building and they did nothing.
Would be a shame if this video went viral.
Friedrich Nietzsche wrote that the state is “the coldest of all cold monsters.”
We could find thousands of examples of this, including the pointless slaughter of healthy ostriches that have been part of a family for decades.
SHAME ON THE POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS IN OTTAWA!
Katie from the Universal Ostrich Farm in Edgewood, BC with a desperate plea to US President Donald Trump.
Our government has turned on us, these beautiful birds don't need to die.
There is important science being done here.
@realDonaldTrump@POTUS@RobertKennedyJr
Treason, Sedition, and Conspiracy (a set of definitions).
Treason: The crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
Sedition: Is language or conduct intended to incite rebellion, insurrection, or violent resistance against a government or lawful authority. It involves actions or speech that stir up discontent, opposition, or hatred toward the government, aiming to overthrow it or disrupt its functioning. While distinct from treason (the act of waging war against the government), sedition focuses on the incitement to disorder or overthrow rather than the overt act itself.
Conspiracy: This is a secret agreement between two or more people to do something bad, illegal, or against someone's wishes, often for a common, unlawful purpose. This term also refers to the group of people or the action of plotting. While a conspiracy can refer to any secret plotting, such as for political gain, a legal conspiracy specifically involves an agreement to commit a crime or lawful end by unlawful means, which can carry its own penalties, even if the intended crime isn't completed.
@BarackObama which definition do you prefer?
@realDonaldTrump@AGPamBondi let’s get on with it. Tell us something is going to happen or nothing at all. There is no more in between. Either we are going to hold people accountable or not. Asking for a couple of million friends.
(Warning: long rant)
My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue.
I’m not talking about people who are “online”; I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues.
Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious.
And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left.
Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly.
I can already hear some of you racing toward the comments to start screeching in moral indignation, so I’m going to be blunt: Shut up and listen to what I’m telling you. Your movement will lose any semblance of relevance if you don’t develop some small measure of self-awareness, and—absent someone force-feeding you bitter medicine—you guys collectively lack the humility to do this on your own.
Here are the facts:
Fact 1. Tens of millions of Americans started the week seeing a 23-year-old blonde woman—a young woman in whom virtually every parent watching pictured their own daughter—stabbed in the neck by a career criminal. These people then found out the murderer had been released from jail 14 times over.
Fact 2. Two days later, tens of millions of Americans watched a video of Charlie Kirk get murdered speaking to college students. Millions of these people knew who Charlie was; millions of them didn’t. Upon seeing the video, however, these normal Americans from across the land and across the political spectrum agreed that he was the victim of a terrible, fundamentally unjustifiable crime, and their hearts broke in sympathy for his family. Good people who had never even heard the name Charlie Kirk before wept.
Fact 3. Immediately after seeing the footage of a peaceful young man get shot in the neck, these same people logged onto Facebook and Instagram (remember, we are talking about regular Americans, not perpetually online Twitter or Bluesky users) and saw some of their local nurses, school teachers, college administrators, and retail workers celebrating this horrific crime. Not just defending it, but cheering it.
These are all facts. You may not like the implications of these facts, and we can certainly debate the underlying causes thereof, but, indisputably, they are nevertheless factual statements.
Here’s what it means for you, the Democrats reading this:
These normal, middle-of-the-road, non-political citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics. After watching Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk both bleed out from the neck, they think their lives and the physical safety of their families—the bedrock of human society, the foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs—depend on political activation, whether they desire it or not.
These people are now sprinting—not jogging, not walking, but racing—to the right. Because they blame you guys for everything that just happened.
When they see footage of Decarlos Brown stabbing a Ukrainian refugee to death, they don’t see just one demon-possessed man. They picture every university administrator, HR bureaucrat, and DEI apparatchik that ever lectured them about systemic racism, the “carceral state,” or the need to release violent crime suspects without bail in the name of social justice.
They then think back to conversations they’ve had with their cop friends—their buddy from high school who quit the force after getting tired of being called a racist, their friend at the local YMCA who vents about having to release career criminals because Soros-funded prosecutors aren’t willing to file charges—and they realize everything the left has told them over the last five years has been utter bullshit.
And they blame you. Because, even if you count yourself as a moderate Democrat, your party supported the district attorneys, city council members, and mayors that let fictitious concerns about mental health and racial justice supersede very real concerns for their family’s safety.
When these Americans see blood erupt from the side of Charlie Kirk’s neck, they don’t see just a martyred political activist. They think of every extreme leftist they’ve ever met who (1) calls anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton a fascist and (2) constantly jokes—“jokes”—about punching Nazis and “bashing the fash.”
They realize that there really do exist people who wish to see them dead for their moderately conservative political beliefs, their Christian faith, and even the color of their skin. They ask themselves if the violence visited upon Charlie might one day show up on their own doorstep.
And they blame you. Because, even if you’re just a center-of-the-road liberal, you lacked the courage to police your own ranks. You let modern-day Maoist red guards run loose across every facet of society, and what started with social-media struggle sessions has now turned to 30-06 bullet holes.
When these Americans log onto social media and see their neighbors justifying, celebrating, glorifying murder, they realize that some who walk among them are soulless ghouls at best, literally demon-possessed at worst. These people—whether they faithfully attend church every Sunday or only attend with relatives once a year, on Christmas Eve—start talking about things like spiritual warfare. They implicitly understand that no normal human casually celebrates the mortal demise of a peaceful person.
And they blame you. Because, even if you condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, they probably haven’t seen you condemn those in your own movement who cheered it on. They view you as complicit in allowing heartless fellow travelers to celebrate death, and it repulses them.
For all of these situations, what has your response been? Nothing but bullshit.
In response to Iryna Zarutska bleeding out on the floor of a train, you post bullshit statistics about reductions in reported crime, when everyone who’s ever been to a major urban center in the last decade knows that actual crime has skyrocketed, only for victims not to waste their time reporting it to cops that don’t have the manpower to respond and prosecutors that seek to downgrade as many felonies as possible to misdemeanor citations.
In response to a 31-year-old man taking a bullet to the neck in front of his family, you post nothing but bullshit whataboutism.
> “What about January 6th?” (Honest answer: After you let Liz Cheney spend two years operating a star chamber in the House, combined with countless other failed attempts at “lawfare” against Trump, no one cares anymore.)
> “What about Mike Lee making a dumb joke on Twitter about some guy in a mask in Minnesota?” (No one outside of Utah, DC, or Twitter knows who Mike Lee even is.)
> “What about Paul Pelosi?” (That’s not comparable to Charlie Kirk getting shot, and we all know it. And, again, Paul who?)
> “What about regulations on assault rifles?” (That’s not going to get you very far when one of these killers used a knife and the other one used a common hunting rifle.)
In response to teachers, healthcare workers, and thousands of other liberals cheering on Charlie’s murder, it’s nothing but more bullshit and misdirection.
> “It’s not THAT many people celebrating!” (Yes, it is. Everyone has seen it on their Facebook and Instagram feeds.)
> “I thought you guys didn’t support cancel culture.” (We don’t cancel people over their opinions; we’re more than happy to see people lose their jobs—especially their taxpayer-funded jobs—for actively cheering on murder, though. If you can’t see the difference, that’s your own shortcoming.)
All bullshit. Not even smart bullshit, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ bullshit. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells.
You probably don’t like hearing this. But you need to hear it.
Because I’m right, and, as you reflect on this, you know I’m right. The ranks of my political movement gained millions of righteously angry new members this week. We have a mandate to ensure these crimes never happen again, and that’s exactly what we are now going to do.
If you want to keep a seat at the table as we do so, you’d better clean house and start policing your own.
@ikwilson Unfortunately, many Canadians buy this insanity from that unelected globalist.
Ending relationship with USA means
Canada’s version of the Great Reset 😅
🙏 Pray this guy looses the election