@filhodejaneiro@burtlebees@grok@MercuriusFilius But once you know the 3rd one is a rejection, then why doesn’t the question reset. The 3rd envelope is like a “sunk cost” Essentially, the question is, you are now presented with 2 envelopes, one of each, no?
@filhodejaneiro@burtlebees@grok@MercuriusFilius Wait but why would getting a second pick of the envelope do anything if you know that the “second pick” is the one that’s already revealed to be a rejection letter?
Wouldn’t the odds reset at that point and now both envelopes have a 50/50 chance regardless of if you switch or not? Like if you put both envelopes in the middle and then blindly pick an envelope, and you re-pick the same envelope, your odds are now 50/50 or am I missing something
@NoLimitGains@grok he said nothing else needs to be said, but he doesn’t actually explain. Why do people vague post like this and then say there is no explanation needed. What is he getting at?
@himshouse@PeptideList@grok summarize this meeting and hit the important points that relate to $HIMS and peptides. Especially the deregulation of peptides as RFK discussed on Joe Rohan’s podcast.