Rob

🔴⚪️ 😉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[Rob @RAG20191]

@realninawysocka Everyday Croydon at its finest

[Rob @RAG20191]

@Kryptotajeer Shouting over others is not confidence 🙄

[Rob @RAG20191]

@JaniceW78256134 @harrysoulcoach He won’t tell you , he hasn’t got a clue himself. 🤷‍♂️ Gate keepers, psyops🙄, angels and demons or whatever he’s going on about.We all know there’s some conspiracy with these migrants and troubles,but when he starts talking bollox with no evidence, it’s farming 4 likes 🤷‍♂️

[Rob @RAG20191]

@crimp_it 🍺🍺 Have a good one mate

[Maxi @AllForProgress_]

We should retire the phrase "two-tier policing." Not because it's not true - as per official police materials, it pretty clearly is - but because it goes nowhere near far enough.

When you look at tragedies like the death of Henry Nowak and try to capture it with a term like "two-tier policing", you end up inadvertently masking a vast constitutional catastrophe underneath a complaint about general procedure, something a review and a reworded leaflet can put right.

What happened to Nowak is a single visible outcrop of something far larger and far worse: the capture, one institution at a time, of the British state by the belief-system of a particular class. It is something to which the public are, slowly-but-surely, awakening, but it's well short of the reckoning it requires.

After all, we have a word for people who steal from an institution. We call it corruption - it is endemic in British public life, by the way - and we know what to do about it. But we have no working word for the thing that is worse: an ideology quietly replacing an institution's reason for existing. A virus of the institutional mind, a toxin of the institutional soul.

A police force exists to protect the public. But a captured police force exists to advertise its own virtue, and will leave the public to bleed on a pavement to do it. You needn't take this on faith: they wrote it down. The police's own Race Action Plan states, in black and white, that equal treatment is the very thing it has set itself against. The institution rewrote its purpose and published the confession, though it expects your submission, rather than your forgiveness.

Nowak's death is the product of that inversion. An officer trained to treat the accusation of racism as the most urgent fact in the room met a dying boy and a lying killer and performed exactly as trained. Nothing has malfunctioned here, nothing at all. The system did precisely what it is now built to do.

And it's not one rogue patrol, either, though the truculence of the Hampshire police commissioner in the face of his officers' malfeasance might tempt you to think otherwise. The same disease runs through institutions with nothing else in common.

Consider William Shawcross' review of Prevent, which found a counter-terror system so warped by fear of the word "Islamophobia" that barely a fifth of its referrals concerned Islamism, while four-fifths of live terror investigations did: an apparatus that exists to see the threat, trained not to look at it. Closer to home, we all know how forces now log tens of thousands of "non-crime hate incidents" - speech that broke no law - while most actual thefts end without a suspect even being sought. Captured institutions keep working. They simply pour their effort into whatever the creed rewards.

None of this is mysterious. Robert Conquest's old law holds that any institution not deliberately kept to its purpose drifts, sooner or later, toward the reigning orthodoxy. Bolt onto that a personnel machine - the diversity directorate, the recruitment that quietly screens for the right opinions - that makes careers out of professing the creed and ends them for doubting it, and the capture becomes self-sealing, because the captured now do the hiring.

What turns this from a blunder into a betrayal is who holds the beliefs and who pays for them. These are what Rob Henderson calls luxury beliefs, and beneath them sits the truth Christopher Lasch named thirty years ago in The Revolt of the Elites: a credentialed class that has seceded from the common life and no longer shares the nation's fate. The beliefs are status markers, costless to the people who profess them, because that class is insulated by the good postcode and the private option from every consequence of what it believes. The bill falls entirely on the people without the buffers - the boy stabbed on a night out, the girl in a town the council won't name being pimped around a circuit of cab drivers who may well be flying their cousins in from overseas to join in their activities.

A doctrine experienced as compassion by the people who hold it that is paid for in the blood of the people who don't.

And when one of those victims dies on camera, the same class looks the country in the eye and tells you that the thing you have just watched didn't happen, and that to have noticed it is the real bigotry.

There's no point talking about reviews or inquiries. We're passed that point. If you want this to stop, you need to be thinking about institutional recapture. We need to commit people, means, and time to the task of hauling each institution back to the job it was built for:

- The police to protect
- The courts to judge on the evidence according to law delivered by a mandated parliament
- Local councils devoted to matters of local import, rather than those which spend their times siphoning away procurement funds and pontificating on matters of obscure foreign policy

...and restoring the most unfashionable principle left in British life, that the state is blind to who you are and answerable only to the truth. Equality before the law is part of the great inheritance we have bequeathed the world, and it has been taken from us on purpose, by people convinced they knew better.

It was taken from us because we were too weak. It is our disgrace and a blotch on our history. But we can return it to ourselves, and return it we must.

[Rob @RAG20191]

@annikaanneli51 @Kent_Online Dick

[Rob @RAG20191]

@SamaHoole @BairyHalsack Criminal

[Rob @RAG20191]

@brandilwells This is a somewhat misleading video. Trees account for approximately 20-30% of the oxygen we breathe, the far more expansive oceans produce the rest.

[Rob @RAG20191]

@WatchReform @LarryTaunton @TRobinsonNewEra It was from a flop 🙄

[Rob @RAG20191]

@Keir_Starmer Two tier kier, is scared.

[Rob @RAG20191]

@justDave_W 🤣🍺

[Rob @RAG20191]

@LastManBalling @ThomasCarlse I see your point, but check out the injury received. It’s football (with feet) not meant to use an elbow to the throat, resulting in life saving care and an induced coma. No place for that type of malicious intent in the game.

[Rob @RAG20191]

Anyone saying ‘shef wed’ is a must win’ … no fucking shit Sherlock!

[Rob @RAG20191]

@SkyFootball @grantaddick100 🤣🤣🤣

[Rob @RAG20191]

@ShaunBart9 @Rich_Harrington @premierleague @CAFCofficial Remember this goal vividly, those were the days !

[Alexandra @Alexandr4Denman]

Only one civil servant has been allocated to address the rape gang inquiry 1 how disgraceful this government is , they do not want the truth out because it affects their voter base and they are deliberately dragging their feet so stats don’t show the truth

[Rob @RAG20191]

@cafcowen I do see your point about him getting slated though (if he were playing) , nature of the game I suppose. so agree with you there. If we had more money , he wouldnt be playing at all. But stats don’t always make the player. Think your stats prove that

[Rob @RAG20191]

@cafcowen Send me the screen shots then, and I’ll happily eat my words. Yet my point was not that leaburn was shit in comparison, just trying to understand the stats you put out, Although (respect to leaburn) I stand by my point that dykes is more affective 🤷‍♂️, would you not agree?

[Rob @RAG20191]

@cafcowen Ok fair enough , but I simply asked the below.

[Rob @RAG20191]

@cafcowen You don’t get it do you. Don’t think I can keep on trying to explain. Think it’s best leaving it there. Good luck to you Owen.