!Investiguen a Iván Cepeda!
¿Hasta donde llegó su relación con el grupo narcoterrorista de las Farc? Queremos la verdad, Corte Suprema, Fiscalía, Corte Penal Internacional.
@CorteSupremaJ@FiscaliaCol@IvanCepedaCast
Sin pagar un tamal y ni un sólo bus con la Minga, Abelardo llenó la Plaza de la Aduana en Cartagena.
Esto es realmente esperanzador, vamos a salvar a Colombia.
FIRMES POR LA PATRIA 🇨🇴🇨🇴🇨🇴
URGENTE COLOMBIANOS
Este video lo están censurando desde la campaña de Cepeda y el gobierno petro. La orden es bajarlo de todas las plataformas y de televisión.
Por eso debemos compartirlo hasta partirle el culo a esta tiranía de mierda, que está descontrolada porque no encuentran la firma de pasar al tigre.
Masiva manifestación del candidato presidencial Abelardo de la Espriella en Cartagena. La segunda vuelta presidencial se hará el 21 de junio. https://t.co/if1kX8q65f
This is the third variation of this argument that I've seen. The memo went out. Looks like this will be the line the left will be taking over the next few weeks.
Just a reminder that if @elonmusk hadn’t purchased 𝕏, we wouldn’t be allowed to talk about the pathetic California elections on here.
Grateful for this app that is America’s public square!!
Pero los jueces no dijeron nada cuando el gobierno usaba banderas del M-19 y no paraba de hacer apologías al terrorismo. Ah pero si se trata de algo que despierta patriotismo y amor por Colombia, que se prohíba. En fin…
Had AI run a statistical analysis on Pratt coming in 3rd based on the ballot drops.
See below:
The trajectory established in the first three batches showed the gap closing at 0.18 points per 1% of ballots counted.
The late batches closed the gap at 0.54 points per 1% counted.
The late batches were moving 3 times faster than the early batches established.
If the trajectory from the first three batches had simply continued, Pratt would still have been leading by +2.93 points at 83% counted. He was actually trailing by -0.40 points. The late batches moved 3.33 points further toward Raman than the established trajectory predicted.
The z-scores on that deviation are -7.81 and -11.29 for the last two batches. The probability of both late batches deviating that far from the established trajectory by chance is effectively zero.
The t-statistic for the acceleration between early and late batch rates is -6.225. With two degrees of freedom, anything above 4.303 is significant at the 5% level. This is well past that.
The plain English answer: The early batches established a clear, consistent trajectory. The late batches didn’t continue that trajectory they moved three times faster in the same direction. That acceleration is not explained by the trajectory that preceded it. The probability that it happened by chance is statistically indistinguishable from zero.
🚨 | URGENTE:
Esta es la familia campesina que iba a votar por Abelardo De La Espriella a la presidencia y que por esa razón fue secuestrada y posteriormente asesinada por las FARC del bandido Calarcá en Remedios, Antioquia.
So… we’re expected to believe that in California, out of three candidates, the third place candidate, who conceded her campaign because she was mathematically eliminated from the run-off, suddenly received tens of thousands of votes from mail-in votes which all came in *after* Election Day, while the other two candidates received no late mail-in votes, and the second place candidate (who was surging as a Republican candidate in the bluest state in the country) is now in third place and mathematically eliminated from the run-off.
… and we’re supposed to trust that this is an honest and true election.
If you’re not angry about this, you need to be.
Antioqueños, la @GobAntioquia ofrece una recompensa por información que conduzca a los criminales farc, responsables del asesinato de cuatro personas en Remedios.
Por alias Jhon Fiera, cabecilla del frente 4 de las farc, hasta 300 millones de pesos. Este sujeto sería el determinador de los homicidios y actúa bajo el mando de Calarcá.
Y por alias Johan Veneco, hasta 100 millones de pesos, quien habría participado de manera directa en los asesinatos y es el hombre que aparece en la fotografía con las víctimas.
I think not supporting voter ID at this point is a pretty clear indication you don’t want fair elections, and we need to stop treating people who don’t want fair elections like they have a simple difference of opinion. freedom has been a relatively brief experiment. it’s at risk.
There is a reason why no other 1st world country runs elections like the US & it is because a system without frequent ID checks & elector roll purges, using widespread mailed-in ballots, is one ripe for fraud .... and this was a mere primary election.
The ballot corruption is happening in California right before our eyes.
In California, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) engages in ballot harvesting, GOTV, and then helps count and tabulate ballots.
This creates a clear conflict of interest and ripe conditions for abuse:
>the SEIU encourages its members and supporters to return ballots
>endorses Steyer/Becerra/Bass
> hired by counties for signature verification, scanning, and tabulation.
This is how they cheat.
We don’t have a democracy if we don’t have trust in our elections.
Gracias, siempre gracias, por acompañarnos en la conmemoración del primer año del atentado que nos arrebató a Miguel.
Verlos aquí, rodeando a nuestra familia con tanto cariño, es la mayor muestra de que su vida dejó una huella imborrable.
Saber que Miguel tuvo personas tan valiosas a su lado, nos da fuerza para seguir adelante.
Ha pasado un año.
Un año en el que Alejandro ha tenido que crecer sin su padre, un año en el que su ausencia duele cada día más, pero también un año en el que su legado sigue vivo en cada abrazo, en cada recuerdo y en cada persona que decide no olvidarlo.
El dolor no se va a acabar nunca, pero vivimos con la fuerza que nos da pensar en él.
No one expected Pratt to win
But they were surprised that he cleanly beat the second place Dem on election night only to have her win the late ballots so hard that they look like two completely different elections
Fmr CIA officer here.
Let me share how elections get stolen — and the role of intel agencies.
We all know that the CIA and NSA create and execute clandestine operations that are designed to go undetected. That ranges from recruiting human spies, tapping phone systems, and altering devices of all kinds.
Yes, that necessarily includes voting machines.
The CIA and NSA have teams to execute all of these operations and missions at the direction of a President, even those ops that are deemed impossible… like machines locked in rooms that are inside secure facilities, unhooked from the internet or whatever device that could tether them to the outside world.
Those tough intel operations require extensive planning, exquisite trade craft, supporting operations (HUMINT, SIGINT, MASINT), and a degree of luck.
For many years, everything that I’m saying was understood by both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill.
Historic footage from Congressional hearings show both Ds and Rs saying that they were alarmed about voting systems with so-called “unhackable machines.” They knew then — correctly — that such a suggestion or claim was ridiculous. They were briefed by NSA and CIA teams on how they “hack the unhackable” every month without leaving a trace.
This is why Taiwan and others are resolute on conducting elections the old fashioned way: same day voting only, in person, IDs, paper ballots, a counting process that is open to the public to watch and monitor, and results announced that same night.
If Taiwan can do it with ~24M people, any US state can do it. Refusal to do so is an intentional choice to open your electoral systems to vulnerabilities.
That's what we’re now seeing across the United States, and primarily in Democrat-dominated locales. Including Los Angeles. Those politicians choose broken systems.
California’s ~30 day process to tally votes is obviously and intentionally vulnerable that a reasonable person understands that it allows for manipulation and assured electoral outcome by a dominant power (Democrats, in this case).
And like any good intel op, you do it such that there are no fingerprints left behind — whether that be with machines, mail-in ballots, harvested ballots, etc. If you own the ops environment, anything is possible.
Still, mistakes happen in any op. In the event of disclosure, you do what we often see Democrats and the media do: deny, smear, and make counter-accusations to preserve intentionally broken systems.
Folks, this is not about Spencer Pratt. This is about the future of what’s left of our Republic.
Evil, seditious forces have broken our electoral systems and gained great power using them. Mayor Bass is but one, using the machine that her Democrat Party has built to sustain her and Leftist power. It’s the modern, Golden State version of old Chicago, NJ, or Huey Long corruption.
They will deny it, obviously. Because admission means loss of power, money, and likely prison time. There’s no incentive for them to clean up what’s broken.
Bottom line: Mr. Pratt’s earnest desire to run a righteous race to fix his city faces long odds. He didn’t just run against Karen Bass. He ran against a corrupt machine.
But if nothing else, he has shown his fellow Angelinos and the nation that, once again, we have an existential problem in our electoral system with intentional vulnerabilities and electoral fraud that naturally flows from the brokenness.
Now it’s up to the rest of us to fix it.
There are solutions, none easy or polite. But we must do so — and by whatever means necessary — or the Republic falls to Communists and Cuba-trained agitators like Karen Bass.
Those are the stakes. Time is short.
Es vergonzoso que las autoridades electorales en Perú hayan declarado que no sabremos los resultados sino hasta después de un mes.
En Colombia tardaron dos horas. Corruptos.