Our short article in The Magistrate, 'Do we need to convict here?', has just been published, where we, inter alia, look at the boundary between careless and dangerous driving.
Still time to join 150 others at the second of our webinars: register here https://t.co/bPnPH4SbRW
Welcomed by @GreenJennyJones; Jeremy Leach on community speed control; Clare Rogers on Low Traffic Neighbourhoods; @RoadPeace on PCCs and me wearing a tie...
Do RT.
We funded @uniofleicester to examine road traffic offences enforcement. The research included interviews with police & crown prosecutors, review of Crown Prosecution case files & cyclist focus groups.
@RST_driving_law @ProfKyd @StevenCammiss Report here: https://t.co/knnmCs9wQ6
@nadine_ansorg @MeteredFare@LTDAForum@TfL Indeed. A point we make in our research. In any other area of policing, we wouldn’t expect the vulnerable to manage risk.
Day #2 of our 12 Days of Research Christmas Countdown: Driving Offences Research Project @RST_driving_law from @ProfKyd & @StevenCammiss produces report on 'Promoting Safety for Vulnerable Road Users' funded by
@RoadSafetyTruUK
https://t.co/LUeMspzWzX
@guyharvey70 @markandcharlie @CHAIRRDRF @ProfKyd @StevenCammiss @RoadSafetyWales @TeeCiano @roadsafety@WeAreCyclingUK@RoadPeace@Brakecharity Get in touch and we’ll be happy to help. The project team are @ProfKyd and @StevenCammiss, both from Leicester Law School. You can find our project report here: https://t.co/xYlTdcpYsd
@markandcharlie @CHAIRRDRF @ProfKyd @StevenCammiss @RoadSafetyWales @TeeCiano @roadsafety@WeAreCyclingUK@RoadPeace@Brakecharity Finally, we’re working on a paper that links exposure to risk to social harms. The benefits of active travel are multiple; failing to tackle vulnerable road users’ exposure to risk can only lead to wider social harm as we, collectively, do not make active travel choices.
@markandcharlie @CHAIRRDRF @ProfKyd @StevenCammiss @RoadSafetyWales @TeeCiano @roadsafety@WeAreCyclingUK@RoadPeace@Brakecharity The threat, from say a close pass, harms our sense of security. While the law does not recognise those exposed to risks as ‘victims’, we say they are victims of this second order harm.
@veloman8 We’ve worked with @ericonabike on this to try and make a difference. We’d definitely like to see a change there (we’re based in Leicester University). The council seem receptive, the police less so.
Is submitting close pass footage to the police a postcode lottery? The experience of these two @roadcc readers suggests it is: https://t.co/grnMBkeHJN #cycling
@NthrnCyclistTVL@PompeyCyclist@Jdrsmith@syptweet@cpsuk As a matter of law, yes, that is what I’m saying. It’s careless, not dangerous. I would like to see more forces actually act on such footage and prosecute for careless in these cases. But it doesn’t meet the threshold for DD. If it did, the CD offence would be redundant.
@NthrnCyclistTVL@PompeyCyclist@Jdrsmith@syptweet@cpsuk But that’s not the law. It’s a useful shorthand, and one that some officers use for decision making. And it still doesn’t make it simple; what is below or far below is an ambiguous test.
@PompeyCyclist@NthrnCyclistTVL@Jdrsmith@syptweet@cpsuk True, but I don’t think it does fit the description. There’s a distinction between careless and dangerous for a reason (not least dangerous carries a possible prison sentence). That really is bad driving, but that doesn’t mean it’s automatically dangerous.
@NthrnCyclistTVL@Jdrsmith@PompeyCyclist@syptweet The near miss case I referred to was an overtake on a national speed limit A road, nearly taking out a motorcyclist coming the other way. While your video is disturbing, it’s not the same level of risk.