RachelJo

Lives in the Midwest. Likes beef. Loves books. Saved by Jesus.

[RachelJo @Raanjo1]

My phone is filling up with more J13 / Trump!Fight memes than I can sort through, so I'm making a thread for easier retrieval.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Complete silence from the BBC on our rape gang inquiry report.

A truly despicable organisation.

[ZUBY: @ZubyMusic]

One of the craziest things about the UK rape gang scandal is that it's largely considered a 'right wing' concern.

In a sane, serious country, it would be completely bipartisan. In fact, it wouldn't even be seen as a political issue, but one of basic justice and morality.

[RachelJo @Raanjo1]

@BaronDestructo I love these looks at what was going on behind the scenes. The O'Neill 'thing in the mug' was one of my favorite gags in SG1, along with spotting the DeLuise.

Thank you for sharing all these memories & pieces of trivia here!

#SaveStargate

[RachelJo @Raanjo1]

@TheBabylonBee And 92% of women. The other 8% really dislike moustaches.

[RachelJo @Raanjo1]

@mark_elevate @Scott_Wiener Thank you!

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

We don’t have 60 votes for the House-passed SAVE America Act

But we do have a simple majority

Given the bill’s widespread bipartisan popularity, we could pass it with a simple majority—by debating it until it passes

I explain how in this clip

Share if you want this to happen

[Chief Egregore Officer @ChiefEgregore]

I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.

I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.

The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.

Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.

This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.

Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.

These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.

This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.

These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.

And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.

It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.

These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.

Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.

Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.

Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.

Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.

NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.

And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.

Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.

As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.

Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.

@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.

The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.

In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.

Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.

[RachelJo @Raanjo1]

@BaronDestructo How to choose?!? In interactions w/the crew, esp. Kirk, Data, Odo, & Garak, who would give me the most entertainment? Maybourne I *know* would be great fun (would he team up w/Garak or would they *hate* each other?) but Todd... Wow. No idea.

So, I pick Todd. I want to know!!

[RachelJo @Raanjo1]

@BaronDestructo Todd!

[Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️ @BaronDestructo]

In some parallel universe, we produced a sixth season of Stargate: Atlantis. And these were the episodes that aired... "#SaveStargate

[Joe Abraham @angeldadjoe]

My daughter, Katie Abraham, was 20 years old when she was killed in a drunk-driving hit-and-run crash in Urbana, Illinois.
The man who killed her was in the country illegally. He fled the scene, leaving behind devastated families and futures that will never be realized.

Katie should still be here.

As her father, I believe Illinois' sanctuary policies, Governor @GovPritzker's "welcoming" approach to immigration, and a lack of meaningful enforcement created the conditions that allowed this preventable tragedy to happen.

What makes this especially difficult to reconcile is that, here in Illinois, sweeping COVID restrictions were accepted with little hesitation because they were framed as necessary to save lives.
Extraordinary measures were justified by a single principle: preventing preventable deaths.

Yet when concerns are raised about border security, immigration enforcement, fentanyl, trafficking, and public safety, that same urgency disappears.

This piece examines that contradiction:
Why are some preventable losses treated as urgent moral imperatives while others are minimized, reframed, or ignored?
For my family, this debate isn't political. It's personal.

Read Here: https://t.co/ZybuMeUF7d

[Aesthetica @Anc_Aesthetics]

The people who have been screaming about the Epstein files non-stop ever since Donald Trump took office are somehow completely silent on the confirmed rape of 250,000 little White girls in the UK.

Kind of makes you think they don't actually give a shit about the children.

[Jeffrey A Tucker @jeffreytucker]

The case of Angela Perryman is a fascinating one. She was on the MV Hondius cruise ship with the hantavirus outbreak. She was exposed but has no symptoms and has consistently tested negative.

She and others were taken to a federal quarantine facility in Nebraska. Others were freed because their states agreed to 24/7 monitored quarantine at home. Florida refused to do that, thus triggering a federal refusal to let her leave. She remains there now, protesting that it is like a prison sentence.

RFK agrees with this quarantine and I suspect the reason comes down to a belief that a targeted quarantine makes better public health sense because it blocks a more general lockdown such as we saw during Covid. An exposed hantavirus suspect on the loose could, maybe, might, generated public anxiety and provide fodder for such a lockdown.

I see the point but, in the end, we are talking about taking away a person's rights for mere exposure and many negative tests. That seems inconsistent with freedom. You cannot violate one person's rights in the name of protecting freedom for all. That's a dangerous trajectory.

The federal quarantine power, granted only for the first time in 1942, is itself inconsistent with the American ideal. Perryman should have been allowed to go home if she so desired and Florida was correct to refuse to put her under house arrest.

I say this not to rap RFK on the knuckles but just as a warning and heads up. The administration wishes that Perryman had just quietly complied but Americans are a funny breed. They believe they have rights.

The whole model of quarantine AND lockdown need to be rethought.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Below is the letter we just sent on behalf of @ICANdecide, @React19org and others to current CDC Acting Director, @DrJBhattacharya, regarding $1.5 billion contracts for Covid-19 vaccines. I am confident Dr. Bhattacharya and @SecKennedy would prefer to direct these funds toward treating and compensating the vaccine injured. I hope the White House will let that happen. As a country, we should take care of those harmed before we rush forward harming others.

Here is the text of the letter (with link to the original below):

Dear Dr. Bhattacharya,

We write on behalf of ICAN, React19, and numerous others to express our deep concern and disappointment that CDC has agreed to purchase $1.55 billion worth of pediatric and adult Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and to raise serious concern regarding a potential violation of federal law.[1]

For the millions of Americans harmed by these products, this decision is deeply painful. Rather than directing resources towards treating those whose lives have been devastated, CDC has chosen to further enrich Pfizer and Moderna. The vaccine-injured deserve acknowledgement and care—not abandonment. The tens of thousands of individuals with serious injuries who have contacted our firm alone, and the over 40,000 members of just one group, React19,[2] with serious injuries represent real people whose suffering demands recognition. To allocate more than a billion and a half tax dollars to Pfizer and Moderna while offering those injured by their products nothing is a profound betrayal.

We struggle to comprehend how CDC’s current leadership can continue to disregard, among others, the following established facts:

•CDC fought in court for over 2 years to prevent public disclosure of data which showed that over 7% of the 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid vaccine, on average 2 to 3 times each, with over 70% of those medical encounters resulting in hospitalization, emergency room visits, or urgent care.[3]

•The fact that FDA fought for years to hide data, recently released, showing that when FDA adequately conducted empirical Bayesian analysis internally, it revealed significant safety signals that were hidden from the public.[4]

•In the clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 deaths in the placebo group—meaning more deaths occurred in the vaccinated group—during the same time period, and where the placebo group contained more participants than the vaccinated group.[5]

•Those seriously injured by this product have been left without recourse because pharmaceutical companies have been granted complete immunity under the PREP Act, while the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) remains woefully underfunded and structurally designed to deny compensation (only 0.39% [56 of 14,152] of COVID-related CICP claims have been compensated, with an average payout, excluding three outliers, of a miserly $5,052.57 per claimant)[6]—leaving the injured with nowhere to turn.

•Five years after assuring the world these products are safe, the manufacturers still require PREP Act immunity for the very harms they claim will not occur—an obvious contradiction that requires suspending reality and reason to believe.

Until PREP Act immunity is lifted and the full scope of harm is properly accounted for, the CDC should not direct over a billion and a half dollars to Pfizer and Moderna. These funds should instead be used to treat and compensate those who have already been seriously harmed—the people who have been waiting far too long for help. The people who the CDC assured this product was safe.

CDC should cancel these contracts on the basis that it would be the moral, ethical, and compassionate thing to do. But if it won’t do so on those bases then, in order to confirm these contracts do not violate federal law, and to avoid litigation, please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts with Pfizer and Moderna were not in any manner related to the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), and that absent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approval, they will not be part of this program.

As you are no doubt aware, absent approval from ACIP, the vaccines procured from Pfizer and Moderna pursuant to these contracts cannot be procured, distributed, or administered through the VFC, and any such conduct would be a clear violation of federal law.[7] As provided in Section 1928 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396s), the VFC mandates that only vaccines recommended by ACIP may be provided under the VFC. Specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 1396s(e) requires the Secretary to use “the list established (and periodically reviewed and as appropriate revised) by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.”

Accordingly, unless and until ACIP affirmatively recommends these Covid-19 vaccines for the applicable pediatric populations, any distribution or administration of the vaccines procured under these contracts through the VFC would constitute a violation of Section 1928 and its implementing regulations.

Please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts have been cancelled and that the funds will be reallocated to assist the vaccine injured. We hope, given your prior statements regarding these products, that you will take this approach. But if the moral and humane approach is not taken, at the very least please confirm forthwith that these procurement contracts are entirely unrelated to the VFC.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Aaron Siri

Here is a link to the full letter: https://t.co/YDJRUMZi2F

[Jeffrey A Tucker @jeffreytucker]

We thought all this would end but the machine just keeps cranking out the poisons. It's too easy to blame RFK and Jay and so on, for they are pushing on every front, working themselves to the bone. The problem is much larger and reaches to a scary truth: politically appointed positions have had only marginal control for many decades, dating way back.

FDA poised to approve Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine despite earlier rejection, by @MaryanneDemasi https://t.co/zxB0Lk8lem

[Neo @Realneo101]

Iranian who escaped Sharia law warns the West:

"I'm Iranian. I went to prison under Islamic law.

I know how it starts… and it always starts with the Left uniting with Islamists.

I came to Canada for freedom. now I’m watching the exact same pattern.

They appease. Weakness invites more. They will never stop."

This man lived it.
The West is sleepwalking into the same nightmare.

[Joe Abraham @angeldadjoe]

The lack of self-reflection from @GovPritzker is staggering.

My daughter Katie was visiting friends at the University of Illinois in Urbana.

Katie never made it home.
She couldn't even get out of Urbana alive.

The illegal immigrant convicted in Katie's death had a horrific background and serious health issues, yet he was issued an Illinois driver's license.

He received protections and consideration that Katie never did.

What kind of governor ignores a grieving family and refuses to confront the consequences of his policies?

Illinois deserves better.

Accountability matters. @TheJusticeDept...Illinoisans need help!

[Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️ @BaronDestructo]

Tomorrow Stargate fans rally to #SaveStargate -

TWEET STORM starting at 10:30 am PT/1:30 pm ET
BANNER FLIGHT over Amazon HQ from 11:00 am PT to 1:00 pm PT (2:00 pm ET to 4:00 pm ET)

Details below!

[Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius]

One of the great power imbalances between conservatives and Leftists is the fact that our religion is religion, while their religion masquerades as politics.

As such, we are governed by SCOTUS-determined “separation of church and state” and the Leftists are not.

Case in point: “Pride Month.”

This is a month-long celebration of the Left’s religion, but because it is not treated as a religion, federal/state/local governments everywhere can indulge in it.

However, if we were to try and have governments celebrating “Jesus Month,” the lawsuits would be so thick you couldn’t cut through them with a rainbow chainsaw.

I’m not sure how to solve this.