Rah2f

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@GTSytb Tu as mal orthographié Mongolito

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@100poundsmuscle @Aleeexanderrrrr Ahhh sorry man I see what you mean and I am wrong actually coz 2010 ATP finals fed wan while being 40-15 up !

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@hammouminator1 @LaTwitchance Ouai

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@No1eRealGoat @DavidHa04461705 @Aleeexanderrrrr Exactly
And the "he waited for Fed to be old to get the H2H advantage" is technially not wrong. But it doesn't say how Fed vultured the H2H when Novak was a teenager. It just balances things up 😇

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Sinnet09 @sam_stoffel And if you were to lose again that match, while holding again 2 match points, on your serve, don't be bitter about it. Don't call your opponent lucky, work on yourself to know why it happened. So that it never happens again, like 8 years after in an hypothetical wimbledon final

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Sinnet09 @sam_stoffel To Never look back. Keep looking forwards
If you lose a slam semi final while holding 2 match points, move on and learn from it. You will come back stronger the year after if you face the same opponent at the same stage of the same slam.

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@goatkovic2021 Thanks bro

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@BashuKayla @Nelsonator9000 @nadalprop_ You can't take "ifs" and change a player's tennis quality (if Nadal had a better shape / physique, if Federer was mentally better on match points against Novak.)

On Novak the "if" is about political considerations and vaccine issue...
Nothing directly correlated to tennis itself

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@hammouminator1 @LaTwitchance Ca cree des réactions : "pourquoi il agit diffetent avec les fans femmes que hommes ? Est-il religieux ?
Timide ?" Fin perso je suis pas qué-cho

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Sinnet09 @sam_stoffel Basically he is telling us that winning 6-1 is not so important if then you lose 3 tie-breaks and you can't win when 2 match points up

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@hammouminator1 @LaTwitchance Aucune polémique hein
Ca fait juste réagir

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@RDagrada @platinium230 Il a totalement raison
Tuer de rage un violeur coupable est légitime
Tuer un bébé innocentdans son ventre AVEC PRÉMÉDITATION ça par exemple ça devrait être un crime

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Neno___None They will tell you this all also just numbers 🤣
The ability to numerise everything and put everything into numbers, doesn't take out the effort and the greatness beyond them

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Presker1 @well_keen @VenomShaft Yeah Novak winning his slams between 2008 and 2023 really make him a weak era merchant, when Roger wan 12 in 2007 or before 2007, and Nadal wan them beetween 2005 and 2022 so almost same period 🤣

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Kevin_Allen98 @TrumpyCaneGhost @DavidHa04461705 @SelvaPr007 Actually I think you are right
Novak always had Rafa around, a 22 slams guy...
Fed had 6-7 free years early on with no big 3 level oponent

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@TrumpyCaneGhost @Kevin_Allen98 @DavidHa04461705 @SelvaPr007 I don't say anything about the eras strenght.
Novak wan the most in the big 4 era, and the most overall
Period

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@Kevin_Allen98 @TrumpyCaneGhost @DavidHa04461705 @SelvaPr007 They use results of some random players (this one made a semi, this one was a slam champion...) to argue that the era was not weak.

But when we use results (24-20 for example) they say "no it doesn't show who is better coz we gotta consider the competition faced"

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@LezFed @DavidHa04461705 @rav_man0 Alcaraz doesnt have a 4 year period of winning wimbledons unlike Fed 03-07 or Novak 18-22
Doesn't have over 100 wins at wimbledon
Sorry he is still too far out

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@S_RF_CA If you remove 2022 wimbledon from Sjokovic he still has 23 slams, 3 more than Federer
So this stat doesn't show Fed is better

[Rah2f @Rah2f447642]

@S_RF_CA So... this 2010 AO is worth 5 slams, for you to consider Federer GOAT due to it ???