Rachel Roll

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

After the release of KC Chris Henley’s Independent report into the CCRC handling of the Andrew Malkinson case, we decided to go back to the SCCRC and send them the report.

Here is what we asked -
Will the SCCRC employ an independent KC to lead a review into their handling of past appeals made by Luke Mitchell to the SCCRC?

Here was the response -
I can advise that the Board of the SCCRC is aware of the report by Chris Henley KC into the (English) CCRC's handling of the Andrew Malkinson case and is considering Mr Henley's report in detail.

So it seems the SCCRC are now telling us that they are considering Chris’s report very carefully.

We welcome this from the SCCRC… It will be better if they willingly fix this failure rather than waiting for someone to come knocking on their door.

To be cont-

If you want to see how Andy’s case mirrors Luke’s you can read Chris’s report here⬇️

https://t.co/DW4oBl3sDN

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @DavidDavisMP @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot @MaxJLHardy
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar @OwenThompson @RossLaird55 @ShabanaMahmood @Keir_Starmer @we_are_APPEAL @edwardhenry1 @emilydugan

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

Unheard facts!

When Luke Mitchell was at trial at 15 years old he was subjected to public humiliation by the Scottish Courts when he should have been treated as innocent until proven guilty…This takes me back to the 1900’s when people were publicly stoned to death or hanged in public.

During Luke’s trial a make shift court was erected to accommodate the reconstruction of the V wall. when a court is adjourned, what is supposed to happen is the jury must be led to a separate holding area away from the public the victims family and the accused.

THIS DID NOT HAPPEN

During this time at trial, the court was adjourned and the Jury made its way outside of the makeshift court to a foyer. Here they mingled with the public and the victims family. So much so that multiple members of the public complained to the courts about the Jury standing talking to the Jones’s.

Not only that but Luke Mitchell was handcuffed to two officers and then he was taken outside of the makeshift court to the foyer, to be publicly paraded right through the middle of the crowd. The same crowd that consisted of the Jury, the public and the victims family.

In addition to this, any Jury at trial in Scotland are not permitted to see any accused in handcuffs before conviction, but this Jury did. This was raised with the court and nothing was done about it. The jury must be free to decide upon the guilt or innocence of the defendant without the risk of being influenced against him by sight of restraint which in their minds suggests that he is regarded with good cause as being a dangerous criminal. The Jury at this point should have been dispersed and a new jury put in place. It was clear they had built an association with the victims family. Was this the reason a Jury member gave the family a thumbs up prior to the verdict being given in court?

Why were the Jury not taken to a separate holding area?

Why were the Jury allowed to mingle with family members of Jodi Jones during trial?

Why was a 15 year old boy who should have been classed as innocent until proven guilty paraded in public in front of the Jury and family members before conviction?

Why was the Jury permitted to see the accused and in handcuffs prior to conviction?

Why did a Jury member give the family a thumbs up before the guilty verdict was read out to the court?

Why did the courts allow this to happen, and why did they not act to replace the Jury when members of the public complained about it?

Luke Mitchell was subjected to a witch-hunt by every authority involved including the Scottish courts

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @DavidDavisMP @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot @MaxJLHardy
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar @OwenThompson @RossLaird55 @ShabanaMahmood @Keir_Starmer @we_are_APPEAL @edwardhenry1 @emilydugan

[MIchael OBrien One of the Cardiff Newsagent Three @michael73798531]

What is the difference between Andy Malkinson case and Luke Mitchells? none both have DNA evidence that points to other people being responsible for the crimes Andy is out now what about Luke Mitchell he should be out with his name cleared too justice will Prevail.

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

The SCCRC admit the DNA they tested did not match Luke Mitchell.

https://t.co/SY28szg0t0

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @DavidDavisMP @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot @MaxJLHardy
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar @OwenThompson @RossLaird55 @ShabanaMahmood @Keir_Starmer @we_are_APPEAL @edwardhenry1 @emilydugan

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

The CCRC have given assurances that they will be revisiting past cases where DNA was dismissed, to identify any potential Miscarriages of Justice. This has been in response to Andy Malkinsons case in England.

In Scotland - Due to DNA belonging to another Man being identified by the SCCRC in Luke Mitchell’s 2014 appeal we contacted the SCCRC directly to ask if they will be doing the same, will they be revisiting cases where DNA that matched another person was present?…..

They said no they aren’t and they won’t be..

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @DavidDavisMP @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot @MaxJLHardy
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar @OwenThompson @RossLaird55 @ShabanaMahmood @Keir_Starmer @we_are_APPEAL @edwardhenry1 @emilydugan

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

The Wrongful Conviction of Luke Mitchell: A Clear Case of Injustice

On June 30, 2003, 14-year-old Jodi Jones was brutally murdered in Dalkeith, Scotland. Her boyfriend, Luke Mitchell, also 14 at the time, was wrongfully convicted of her murder in one of the most egregious miscarriages of justice in recent history. Despite a lack of direct evidence and numerous investigative flaws, Luke remains imprisoned. This post aims to shed light on the critical facts that demonstrate his innocence.

The Tragic Night

Jodi left her house around 5 PM after exchanging text messages with Luke. Later that night, Luke, along with Jodi's family members, discovered her mutilated body in a wooded area. Luke's dog, Mia, led them to the tragic scene. Luke was immediately taken to the police station, but Jodi's family members who were also in the search party, were not considered important witnesses until hours later, leading to a compromised investigation from the outset.

Shocking Police Incompetence

The handling of the crime scene was marred by mishandling and errors. Forensics arrived the next morning, and by then, crucial evidence was lost. Jodi's body was left uncovered, exposed to the elements and possible contamination. Astonishingly, bin collections, council hedge cutting, and school activities continued as normal, in the areas surrounding the crime scene, further jeopardizing evidence.
Despite the sloppy investigation, several key pieces of evidence emerged:

• DNA Samples: A full DNA sample on Jodi's clothing matched another member of the search party—Janine's boyfriend. Multiple other DNA samples, including semen and saliva, were found but never matched to anyone.

• No DNA Link: Importantly, no DNA evidence linked Luke Mitchell to the crime scene.

The Media's Role in the Moral Panic

For ten months, the media demonized Luke, portraying him as a dark figure obsessed with Marilyn Manson and the occult. This irresponsible journalism created a moral panic, influencing public perception and poisoning the jury pool. Luke's lifestyle, interests, and appearance were scrutinized more than the actual evidence.

The Flawed Trial and Unjust Conviction

Despite the lack of direct evidence, Luke was arrested in April 2004 and convicted in January 2005 after Scotland's longest single-accused trial. The prosecution relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, much of which has been debunked:

• Inconsistent Witness Statements: Initial statements from the search party aligned with Luke's account but changed over time, indicating potential coaching or coercion.

• Baseless Claims: Allegations about Luke's interest in Marilyn Manson and the occult were later discarded by the Crown during appeals, highlighting the flimsy nature of the prosecution's case.

An Innocent Life Stolen

The conviction of Luke Mitchell is not just a miscarriage of justice; it is a stark reminder of how societal biases and media influence can destroy an innocent life. The mishandling of evidence, the relentless focus on Luke's lifestyle, and the complete lack of forensic links to him demonstrate his innocence beyond any doubt.
As we continue to explore this case, it is imperative to acknowledge that Luke Mitchell is a victim of a deeply flawed system. Justice has not been served, and it is our duty to rectify this wrong.

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @Dhruva4Alba @Nick4GlasNorth @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55 @TRobinsonNewEra @ShabanaMahmood @Keir_Starmer

[Inside Justice @insidejusticeUK]

"I'm appalled at some original investigations that weren't the search for the truth."

Our Head of Casework, Nora, explains why she's running over 200km for Inside Justice later this month 🏃

You can sponsor her here: https://t.co/QRNizcJrxl

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

🚨 Update on Luke Mitchell's Case 🚨

In 2003, Luke Mitchell was jailed for the murder of his girlfriend, Jodi Jones. For the past 20 years, Luke has maintained his innocence. The 2021 documentary, Murder in a Small Town, shed light on Luke's case, sparking significant public interest.

🔍 Key Developments:

•Following the documentary's release, at the peak of public interest, Police Scotland discussed destroying the evidence and productions held in storage.

•By the time Luke's legal team was informed, over 90% of the evidence had been destroyed. Thankfully, the remaining 10% includes crucial forensic samples, such as semen and saliva, which have never been tested. Luke's defense was unaware of these samples until recently.

•Communication is ongoing between Luke's legal team and SPA/COPFS to have these samples released for testing.

🏢 Recent Challenges:

•After the documentary's release, Luke was moved to HMP Greenock in preparation for his upcoming parole hearing.

•Despite Luke being 15 at the time of his arrest with no prior police involvement, Police Scotland launched an in-depth investigation into alleged prior offending.

•This investigation stalled Luke's progress at HMP Greenock, leaving him in limbo for over a year. The result of the investigation was a psychiatrists report that when used at Luke's parole hearing was given no weight and was to be disregarded.

🎥 New Documentary Release:

•After over a year of this treatment, The Sound of Silence was released, where Luke Mitchell tells all about his treatment at HMP Greenock. He was subsequently moved back to HMP Shotts.

⏳ Current Status:

•For Luke to progress through the prison system, an RMT (Risk Management Team) meeting must be held. Despite being back at HMP Shotts for almost a year, no RMT meeting has taken place.

❓ Critical Question:How can the police conduct an in-depth investigation while simultaneously destroying crucial evidence held in storage?

⚖️ Concerns About the Conviction:

•Luke Mitchell was convicted primarily on circumstantial evidence, despite the existence of DNA evidence that pointed away from him.

•He was forensically examined by a police surgeon just hours after Jodi Jones was found. Although he was dirty and unwashed, there was no forensic evidence linking him to the crime scene.

•This lack of forensic evidence, combined with the destruction of the majority of the case evidence and the existence of untested samples, raises significant concerns about the safety and validity of his conviction.

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @Dhruva4Alba @Nick4GlasNorth @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

The police were sure when they found this DNA that it would belong to their “prime suspect” the “only suspect” Luke Mitchell

So much so that they were intent on using it against him at trial.

Fast forward to test results when the DNA did not match Luke Mitchell.

Why at this stage was the DNA found no longer useable?

Should Luke have been the only suspect by this stage? Was it right that the police disregarded this DNA at this stage, Just because it did not match the child they were after?

If it was strong enough to use against Luke had he been the owner, why was it not strong enough to use against the person who deposited it?

The Scottish system is a shambles and abusive. How can anyone in power accept this and ignore it. Why are we 20 years down the line and no one has helped that innocent Boy now Man whilst he still languishes in Prison?

WHY 😢

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @Dhruva4Alba @Nick4GlasNorth @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

Since when in Scotland does circumstantial evidence become stronger than Multiple Samples of Physical DNA evidence?

WHEN YOUR NAME IS LUKE MITCHELL, THATS WHEN!

The SCCRC have the results of DNA from the appeal in 2014. They chose to disregard physical DNA evidence that was found on the deceased trousers, the same DNA they admitted belongs to another man who is not Luke Mitchell

We can’t appeal these findings because the SCCRC already made the decision then to say it’s not relevant. In other words “Ignore it”

IT IS VERY RELEVANT

Which leaders of Scotland are going to stand up for Scotland’s people? The power of Scotland are leaving it up to the public (strangers) to put right this horrific catastrophe, that was thrust upon an innocent family

#RELEASETHESAMPLES #GETHIMOUTNOW

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @Dhruva4Alba @Nick4GlasNorth @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @CTodd_ALBAParty @AlbaGlasgowSW @Dhruva4Alba @Nick4GlasNorth @IndyAspScot @ScotTories @scottishLabour @SNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs @PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

On June 30, 2003, 14-year-old Jodi Jones was brutally murdered in Dalkeith, Scotland. Her boyfriend, Luke Mitchell, also 14, was soon under suspicion. Despite no direct evidence, Luke was convicted in January 2005, after Scotland's longest single-accused trial, at that time.
He's maintained his innocence ever since.

The investigation was fraught with mishandling and bias. Crucial evidence was ignored, mismanaged, or not followed up on. Forensic evidence from the scene pointed away from Luke, yet the focus remained solely on him. The media painted Luke as a Satanist and a danger, influencing public opinion and the trial.

The case against Luke Mitchell relied on broad inferences and circumstantial evidence that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

Should a teenager be imprisoned for life based on a weak circumstantial case when DNA evidence found on the victim doesn't match him and is yet to be identified?

Let's discuss: Has justice truly been served for Jodi Jones, or is Luke Mitchell a victim of a flawed system?
#JusticeForJodiJones #LukeMitchell
#NotTheOnlyOne

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @ProfDavidWilson @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @Keir_Starmer @CTodd_ALBAParty @HumzaYousaf @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @channel5_tv @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs
@PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

SUSPECT BEHAVIOUR ??
(See image)

We all know Luke Mitchell was subject to Trial by Media. We all know Lothian & Borders Police & Police Scotland fed the Media information about a 14 year old Child, as well as showing witnesses images from paper cuttings that he shouldn’t have been in, in the first place before they asked them to identify him.

The Police were very much leaking confidential information to the Media that had an enormous impact on Luke Mitchell’s ability to have a fair Trial.

The only suspect in a case that had multiple samples of DNA that Matched another Male. No DNA present from the ONLY suspect. 🤔

Beggars Belief

#GetHimOutNow
#ReleaseTheSamples

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @ProfDavidWilson @AlexSalmond @citizentommy @AConstance23 @Keir_Starmer @CTodd_ALBAParty @HumzaYousaf @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @channel5_tv @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs
@PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA @AamerAnwar
@kirstyjmcneill @OwenThompson @RossLaird55

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

*Luke Mitchell update*

Intimation of decision of mandatory oral hearing for Luke Mitchell, prisoner 89543 within HMP Shotts which took place at HMP Shotts on 15th April 2024

REFERRAL:

Scottish Ministers have referred the case of Luke Mitchell to the Parole Board for Scotland for a decision on release. This was to be made by the panel of the Board convened by live link to the above establishment on the above date.

TEST FOR RELEASE:

Before it can direct release, the panel must be satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the protection of the public that Luke Mitchell should be confined.

DECISION:

• The panel is not satisfied on this matter, and does not direct release
• The decision of the panel is unanimous

REVIEW PERIOD:

• There should be a further review for possible release on licence.
• The next review should take place 12 months from the date of consideration

REASONS FOR DECISION

A full minute, setting out the reasons for the panel's decision will be issued within 10 working days.

Luke was made to wait over a month for this to arrive!

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @ProfDavidWilson @AlexSalmond @Douglas4Moray @citizentommy @AConstance23 @Keir_Starmer @CTodd_ALBAParty @HumzaYousaf @AngusRobertson @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @channel5_tv @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs
@PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @LouiseShorter19 @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALB @AamerAnwar

[Inside Justice @insidejusticeUK]

'The Wrong Man: 17 Years Behind Bars' will air on BBC2 tonight at 9pm and will also be available on BBC iPlayer.

This documentary follows Andy Malkinson's 20 year journey to prove his innocence after being sentenced to life in prison.

https://t.co/7f1zaOyjo2

#truecrime

[Luke Mitchell Official Campaign @LMC89543]

One thing that’s clear to me is that Scotland’s public are behind Luke Mitchell

The longer it takes, more will speak up.

We are here for as long as it takes.

#DnaOfAnotherMan
#NoDNAofLukes
#SccrcAdmittedItPublicly
#GetHimOutNow

@stuzi_pants @Stephenheid @JNHanvey @Tucker5law @WeKnowTheyKnow1 @Raicheruu @michael73798531 @ProfDavidWilson @AlexSalmond @Douglas4Moray @citizentommy @AConstance23 @Keir_Starmer @CTodd_ALBAParty @HumzaYousaf @AngusRobertson @ScotTories @scottishLabour @TheSNP @scottishgreens @niallfraser8 @AnasSarwar @labourpress @scotlibdems @RussellFindlay1 @Joannaccherry @JamesEnglish0 @conventionLaird @BBCScotlandNews @STVNews @Channel5Press @channel5_tv @Channel4News @itvnews @copfs
@PoliceScotland @ParoleBoardScot
@midgov @midCSJP @scottishprisons @MailOnline @DailyMirror @edinburghpaper @ScottishSun @ScotParl @LouiseShorter19 @JohnSwinney @_KateForbes @AshReganALBA

[APPEAL (Centre for Criminal Appeals) @APPEALcharity_]

'The Wrong Man: 17 Years Behind Bars'. A documentary about our client Andy will air on 6th June, BBC2 at 9pm. It will also be available on BBC iPlayer #NotTheOnlyOne

https://t.co/whzP8CfYEK
@BBCTwo @BBCiPlayer

[Heather @TruthWinzz]

2003
Craig Dobbie Ws Lookin Into Whether Jodi's Murder Ws 'Sexually Motivated'
He Decided It Wasn't. A 14yo Child,Stripped,Tied Up,Semen From Two Men On & Nearby The Body. What Went So Wrong. Why Did He Refuse When CrimeWatch Offered 2 Feature The Murder https://t.co/fyK8z0mDJ5