@papiromagico@elivieira "Marques, o Mendonça o Fux, a Igreja Lagoinha, o ativo minerario do Nikolas, Mario Frias, Dark horse, rockbridge..."
Qual desses é do PT ou tem ligações direta com Lula ?
STF no seu nível mais baixo da história. É hora de lembrar quem foi o “técnico” que escalou cada um destes “jogadores “. E que o Senado deu seu amém a todos eles.
Para os acusados do dia 08/01/2023, muitos deles extremamente pobres, ou com problemas psicológicos, ou que sequer tinham chegado a Brasília no momento da confusão, bastou tão pouco...
Ver a esquerda brasileira chorando contra a censura judicial e dizendo que 'Censura é coisa de ditadura!' é a mesma coisa que ver o @AndreJanonesMG dando lição de moral contra rachadinha e fake news.
Aqui um EXPOSED de uma alienada.
Se o contrato de 130 milhões não PROVA q o Xandão é corrupto, nada conseguirá convence-la.
Vc tem duvida q o Moraes fizesse uma confissão publica de corrupção, pessoas assim dariam um jeito de defende-lo?
I spoke with @LaulPatricia about Marxism:
One is: What’s remarkable is that Marxism has been tried. Now, of course, defenders of Marxism say it hasn’t really been tried anywhere, but certainly the people who implemented it claimed they were implementing Marxism.
And this is a massive experiment—a global experiment—with a very clear outcome. Namely, the Soviet Union was a disaster. The imposition of communism on Eastern Europe was a disaster. The imposition of communism in Venezuela was a disaster. The imposition of communism in Maoist China was a disaster. Disaster in terms of both poverty and oppression and genocide and stupid wars. So the world has told us what happens under communism, and it’s a sign of how out of touch intellectuals can be that there are still people who defend it despite the entire world giving a very clear-cut answer.
One more is: would you rather live in North Korea or South Korea? Would you rather live in the old East Germany or West Germany? We have an experimental group and a matched control group in terms of culture, language, and geography, and the answer is crystal clear. So this is a sign of, I think, the pathology of intellectual life—that Marxism can persist.
The other is, you did call attention to one of the appeals of Marxism, though, and more generally of heavy, strong influence of government guided by intellectuals, which is that there are certain kinds of reforms that you can state as principles. You can articulate them verbally as propositions—like equality, human rights, democracy—but there’s other kinds of progress that take place in massive distributed networks of millions of people, none of whom implements some policy. But collectively, there is an order, an organization that’s beneficial.
So that can happen organically through, for example, the development of a language. No one designed the English language. It’s just hundreds of millions of English speakers. They coin new words. They forget old words. They try to make themselves clear. And we get the English language and the other 5,000 languages spoken on earth.
Likewise, a market economy is something where knowledge is distributed. You don’t have a central planner deciding how many shoes of size 8 will be needed in a particular city, but rather information is conveyed by prices, which are adjusted according to supply and demand. And you’ve got a distributed network of exchange of information that can result in an emergent benefit.
Now, intellectuals tend to hate that. They like rules of language—of correct grammar. They like top-down economic planning. They like cultural change that satisfies particular ideals described by intellectuals. And so rival sources of organization, like commerce, like culture—traditional culture—tend to be downplayed by intellectuals.
And this can be magnified by the fact that many dictatorships give a privileged role to intellectuals, which may be why, over the course of the 20th century, and probably continuing to the present, there has not been a dictator that has not had fans among intellectuals—including the mullahs and ayatollahs of Iran, but also the communist dictators: Mao and Castro, even Stalin in his day. And every other dictator has had, actually, often fawning praise from Western intellectuals.
@larrykingundead In Brazil that's how the ultimate line was published when I was a kid.
all the titles would come together in a big flop volume every month, It was called "Marvel Millenium: Homem aranha". Most of the time the cover was from a ultimate spiderman issue.
Since yesterday, people keep asking me the same question: How can someone be hanged for opening a door?
I want you to see the answer with your own eyes.
Two Iranian protesters. Both killed in front of cameras for showing compassion.
One opened a door when protesters came running security forces right behind them, armed. He let them in. Then he pushed against that same door with everything he had, trying to keep the security forces out. They forced it open. And they killed him right there.
The other had a wounded protester on his shoulder, carrying him through the streets to safety. That was enough.
Empty hands. No weapons. Just human beings doing what human beings do, protecting each other.
The Islamic Republic calls this a crime worthy of death.
That is the Iran the world needs to see. The Islamic republic is terrorist not the people of Iran.
#StopExecutionInIran
💔
Not sure if Americans realize how much of the worst discourse tactics end up globally imported due to social media connectivity.
In Brazil, Lula's wife is facing criticisms for spending lavish sums on foreign travel to luxurious places. She claimed the criticisms are all due to "pure misogyny" -- at exactly the same time that a center-left AOC clone named @tabataamaralsp is pushing a censorship bill to "criminalize misogyny." That would make it a crime to question the First Lady's travel expenses or that Congresswoman's views (since they always claims it's due to misogyny).
Here was a debate on Brazil's Globo News network about why Kamala struggled to win over black voters. One of the network's extremely affluent commentators, @sandraacoutinho, argued that it was all due to sexism, and when a fellow male commentator on the panel disagreed with her, she accused him of "mansplaining": all copied and imported from the bowels of the lowest-level American social justice lexicon:👇
Entre 1993 e 2021, a Argentina não conquistou títulos. Foi um período de quase 30 anos de seca do futebol dos hermanos.
Neste mesmo período o Brasil ganhou 2 copas do Mundo, 5 copas América e 4 Copas das Confederações.
Te desafio a encontrar um único jornalista esportivo argentino q torcia pelo Brasil e usava a camisa amarela nas transmissões esportivas argentinas quando o Brasil tinha o melhor futebol do mundo.
Ache um único jornalista argentino q antes da final de 2002 tenha escrito: "vou torcer pelo Brasil pq Ronaldo é melhor do mundo e merece encerrar a carreira com uma copa so dele"
Unzinho só tá valendo pra mim
Tem uma coisa q a Argentina é bem melhor q o Brasil, Rizek: no jornalismo esportivo. Lá os jornalistas não são um bando de babacas vendidos e deslumbrados.
Meu coração decolonial por fim se aquieta nas semifinais da Copa. Hj jogam as ex-colônias dos romanos e dos francos contra a ex-colônia africana dos mouros e de Cartago. Amanhã a ex-colônia dos romanos e dos normandos enfrentará a ex-colônia espanhola. Só sobraram vítimas. Viva!