What do control theory and neuroscience have in common? Shared origins in cybernetics — and, lately, “poor cousin” status next to ML. To reconnect them, we’ve been organizing workshops at this interface, most recently at the Flatiron Institute. Thanks to all who joined!
We are recruiting PhD students and postdocs at UIUC ECE interested in learning dynamics, spiking networks, and dynamical systems. Details: https://t.co/Ge1hy1EC5K
Belated update: I joined UIUC ECE as an Assistant Professor. Our lab works at the intersection of theoretical neuroscience, machine learning, and dynamical systems, with a focus on learning and spiking networks. I had to miss #COSYNE2026 for visa reasons.
The #SNUFA24 final program is out and the event is next Tue-Wed! If you love spiking neural networks, click on the link below to check it out and register (free).
https://t.co/U7TGfWN815
@Antihebbiann@HSompolinsky@yasharadian See also the related work by Bruno Cessac et al:
https://t.co/HaBSaq1ZrG
https://t.co/Afi4fyXcWS
https://t.co/qgr1t3wZg5
@Antihebbiann@HSompolinsky As @yasharadian pointed out, there is previous work on the finite-N effects on the chaos transition in discrete-time networks (with delays) by David Albers et al. that I only recently learned about:
https://t.co/aC2zUp3g0y
https://t.co/2wjzk4pfH7
https://t.co/8djG6bzoYW
I thank S. Goedeke, J. Liedtke, R.-M. Memmesheimer, M. Monteforte, A. Palmigiano, M. Puelma Touzel, A. Schmidt, M. Schottdorf, and F. Wolf for fruitful discussions. Moreover, I thank L.F. Abbott, S. Migirditch, A. Palmigiano, Y. Park, and D. Sussillo for comments on a draft.
12/n
SparseProp doesn't work (yet) for stochastic input most multivariate neuron models. Advantageous scaling of O(log(N)) only for sparse networks (Fixed number of synapses per neuron). A more fundamental limitations: it is not clear how to calculate surrogate gradients.
11/n
I gave a talk about some of the core idea of SparseProp at #JuliaCon some years ago, but this was an earlier version of Julia and didn't include heterogeneous networks, Chebychev polynomials and network training. https://t.co/zHlmGxN5qY
10/n
Excited to present this afternoon another #NeurIPS paper on #SparseProp, which is a novel event-based algorithm to simulate and train spiking neural networks, reducing computational cost from N to log(N) per network spike for sparse spiking networks:
https://t.co/Wz4q1PDAiS
1/n
SparseProp can also be used for event-based training of spiking networks, the backward pass has the same complexity as the forward pass. Caveat: Many people use surrogate gradients and it is not clear to me how to do that in event-based simulations. Any ideas? @hisspikeness
8/n
For neurons where the next spike time can't be obtained analytically, e.g. exponential integrate-and-fire, SparseProp is still an option. Instead of the analytical phase response curve (PRC), the numerical PRC can be approximated precisely using Chebychev polynomials.
7/n