@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT I mean I hope so as well, got nothing against Elon or tesla tbh... a bit skeptical. The situation about the first roadster was pretty bad so I don't blindly trust them... they still have to evolve the demo cars into actual production version but I guess 2 years could be enough
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT Didn't know about the window, interesting tho
Haven't seen any interior cam or such on the flying one tho, got a link?
Ik about battery etc, I didn't mean an empty shell, just that some elements were not present/different from the production car, still a "prototype" after all
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT Also going back to our main point here, it will also be interesting to see if the tesla will actually releases and if it doesn't just remain a concept like the og roadster
@DanyPell@david_may@Porsche I mean I agree with the fact that in the future there could be some uses... but ye the og comment was basically "if car can't fly they suck now" so you get my point
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT Lmao if you used your brain you'd get that the top gear video means nothing... that is not the same car that performed the jump...
You go check online why there's big chance that specific one was a shell or wasn't an usable vehicle...
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT Lmao great arguments you got on your end man, afters saying i didn't have any, you just know how to insult? Usually happens when you are losing an argument...
@DanyPell@david_may@Porsche Sure... if we complete ignore safety it definitely is... using those thrusters over traffic wouldn't cause any damage to others car and pedestrian uh, and if the othere side of the road is also congested and the thrusters run out of "fuel" where do you land
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT "Everv usable void in the car is packed with Carbor Fiber Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPVs)," The company said "every usable void" in the car is filled with these vessels. That also is interesting... also Google it and you can find more reason why it is probably a shell
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT There are 3 version btw... and the rocket one is non street legal while the other two are basically normal cars so what is there to be amazed?
Nobody (reporters os such)could get close up, no interior shown, they had to put the tanks somewhere, also weight and underside...
@Twizz7871@ssskryl@YazanXBT Porsche's official press said it is a new supercar platform above the 911. They did something similar with the Mission E, which became the Taycan
Tesla itself said that the Rocket Roadster is "Not approved for public road use"
It was quite obvious that the demo one was a shell
@DanyPell@david_may@Porsche They sure can, but at the current state that technology would be useless anyways... I can't imagine a actual situation where you'd need that feature...
Imo it needs to have actual sustained flight capability to be useful (altough there would some complications with ffa or such)
@twinturbomonkey@Lamborghini Sure buddy... confirmed by the other responses as well but you do you... you don't seem very logical yourself so no reason to keep arguing... enjoy your roadster if it even come out like the 2017 one, I'd still prefer a Revuelto
@JordanEVGuy@AntonioTantalo They basically showed the looks of the actual car they want to release in 2029 or so.... Porsche has already done this with the Mission E which became the Taycan and others as well... it will become an actual car... unlike the roadster promised in 2017 by tesla...
@AndrewFinegan@sporadica Looks better than the roadster to me... plus we have no proof of the roadster being faster... I weighs more and aeros are worse... two things that matter a lot in a track or so... just fans won't automatically make it faster. Also what does the Mission S pic has to do with this?