@HavryshkoMarta Only two results can achieve peace either Ukraine lost the war and become landlocked and powerless. Or Russia should lost to the 1992 boarders, not even possible. In-between is another war for the future that's the most probable result.
Some infrastructure projects are not tests of engineering.
They are tests of whether a civilization can think beyond an election cycle.
Chinaβs South-to-North Water Diversion Project has now delivered about 90 billion cubic meters of water, benefiting 195 million people.
The remarkable part is not that China has the technology or money to build it.
The remarkable part is that a project this enormous can survive decades of planning, land acquisition, construction, ecological restoration, financing, administrative coordination and political transition β and still reach completion.
In many countries, one lawsuit, one election, one budget fight, one change of government, one contractor collapse can turn a megaproject into a monument to paralysis.
In China, once a national infrastructure project begins, the assumption is different:
finish it.
And there is something else outsiders often miss.
The engineers and workers who build these projects are not just completing contracts.
They can point to a canal, a bridge, a railway, a dam and say:
I helped build this country with my own hands.
And hundreds of millions of ordinary people feel the result every day β not as ideology, but as water from the tap.
That is what infrastructure looks like when state capacity becomes daily life.
@MilitarySummary Russia is too soft. The war is already lost interms of casualties Russia suffered enough to avoid any major wars to the coming 10 to 15 years.