Rationalist ™️

Untangler of Information ™️ All original content © 2023 All Rights Reserved

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

Rights, in that non-theistic sense, accrue by virtue of our existence and nature as living human beings and the necessities of nature for social constructs to regulate behavior in communities, and the term "Creator" becomes little more than a place-holder for natural behaviors.

[Dr. Empress of All Dominions Elect @LichenCraig]

@RatioDisputati @TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @RealMattCouch Wouldn't that be a surprising turn toward national sanity!

[Dr. Empress of All Dominions Elect @LichenCraig]

Love this tweet. 👇👇👇

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@Modeus2022 Ooh-RAH!

[🇺🇸 Marcus 🇺🇸 @Azraels_Brother]

Jesus fucking Christ on a rubber fucking crutch!! Just how many days and months does the alphabet mafia need before they feel "seen"? We don't GAF WHO you want to sleep with. Live your lives. Stop shoving it down the rest of our throats every time we turn around!

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@GeeSungee @OnlinePalEng @Israel @JoeBiden @WhiteHouse @latstetter @CapaTosta122 @NancyHWeaver1 @LeftwardSwing @Hedgesgurl @gerber_desiree @DrLearnALot @cattell84 @CanDCain @IDF Your claim, your burden of proof.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@LeftwardSwing @latstetter @GeeSungee @OnlinePalEng @Israel @JoeBiden @WhiteHouse @CapaTosta122 @NancyHWeaver1 @Hedgesgurl @gerber_desiree @DrLearnALot @cattell84 @CanDCain Yes it is. But it happens anyway.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch I think it’s pretty obvious that, not being a Supreme Court Justice or a federal judge, that I was expressing an opinion. Very lame argument…and I thought you muted me.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch I think you’ve run out of rational arguments and know it. In any event, thanks for the colloquy, have a good night.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch Your opinion is noted in re what constitutes evidence of criminal conspiracy. There is no doubt that there is a conspiracy to destroy America. Several of them in fact. Islam and Marxism are two examples. The remaining issue is whether they are defined as criminal enterprises.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch I never made such a claim. I believe it *should be* illegal and that the impact of the speech under scrutiny justifies making it illegal. That’s different.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch I didn’t say it was.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch It’s remarkable how war, especially terrorism, can change public perceptions of this or that ruling…including Citizens United, Roe, Heller, McDonald, Caetano, Bruen and the Patriot Act. We now have a conservative majority that may decide terrorism and its advocacy is unlawful.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch No, you asserted it. You cites two cases, both of which were rulings based on the specific language in the statutes that the Court found to be “overbroad.” That’s not synonymous with “absolute constitutional bar on all regulation of seditious speech,” as we see in 18 USC § 2384.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch The keyword in your hopeful statement is “now.” Now is not forever, or even tomorrow. “Now” instantly becomes “then” as circumstances change.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch I didn’t suggest that was an appropriate standard for regulation, merely that Islamic terrorism is a clear and present danger that needs regulation.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch Oh, and I remind you of what was said of Roe v. Wade…and then there’s Citizens United, Heller, McDonald, Caetano and Bruen. The edifice of liberal Marxism is crumbling.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch And now it isn’t. There’s nothing that impedes the Supreme Court to revisit the definition of seditious conspiracy and true threats, now is there?

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@TmthyPatrick @IAmClarkGreggs @LichenCraig @RealMattCouch Assuming arguendo that you’re right, we, the People, can make it so if we choose to do so. By statute, or by amendment, no matter how many times you deny the truth and the threat.

[Rationalist ™️ @RatioDisputati]

@MonikaMusing @RSBNetwork Liar.