@SPIDERDRAGONfly@Thekeksociety Tired old conspiracy theory. Testing of mt Shasta water shows safe/normal levels of aluminium. No evidence of any increase, let alone caused by geoengineering (which is a very real localised scientific technology)
Finally found a county, excess deaths data set. I ran it against COVID vaccine administration rates by county for full year 2021 and 2022. Clearly there’s a negative correlation between excess death rates and vaccine administration rates
As always: Source links follow the thread
@ABridgen The adverse events reported aren’t necessarily caused by the vaccine. That’s an important point made at the start of the (not-secret) report, which is ignored by the antivax cabal. Asking a question about it in parliament only shows your lack of understanding.
@JordanSchachtel What study is it that used four rats? From your screenshot I see “four occasions” but thats not the same as four rats. That’s four doses per rat.
@thecoastguy FDA regulates how drugs are marketed for labelled use. Off-label use isn’t regulated by the FDA, but they still advise that Ivermectin should not be used to treat covid.
@JohnnoMcClane@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein #1 purpose is to stop people getting sick. Hopefully vaccines also help lower the virus level in saliva etc to reduce transmission, but that isn’t & has never been the main purpose, which is why we had lockdowns. Have you learnt anything? Do you now know what vaccines are for?
@JohnnoMcClane@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein So you don’t know what a vaccine is for. Vaccines are ameliorative. The immune system is better prepared to reduce or nullify any disease caused by the pathogen. Fewer deaths and hospitalisations. THAT is what vaccines are for and I’m shocked you’re only just learning this
@JohnnoMcClane@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein Re-read my post. The main job of a vaccine is to prevent hospitalisation and death when infected. Preventing spread is a side-benefit but not the main aim. That’s what Pfizer have said. Not a secret
@DocAhmadMalik The aborted fetus is many generations removed from those cell lines used during research and virus replication. No new sources are needed, and no human material is present in the vaccine itself
@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein@WorldByWolf The evidence is hundreds of studies into their safety, showing side effects to be extremely rare. Oh, and a basic understanding of the immune system, which you don’t have
@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein@WorldByWolf Back to my point, yes you need evidence it causes harm, especially when the current evidence shows it is safe and effective. Your drinking bleach analogy doesn’t work for you. I understand HOW it harms and at what dose, diluting it to an easily safe level if need be
@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein@WorldByWolf Exactly. Evolutionary biology is not immunology or virology. I doubt he’d tolerate an expert on vaccines telling him he’s wrong about evolution, so why is the opposite ok? He doesn’t understand how mRNA vaccines work, that’s why I don’t think he should be listened to.
@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein@WorldByWolf Yes you need evidence. I think you need to demonstrate you understand how the vaccines work first. I don’t think Bret knows either. It’s like dismissing evolution without knowing what evolution is
@JohnnoMcClane@BUDDGAF @burn20134160340 @BretWeinstein@WorldByWolf Preventing hospitalisation and death when you’ve caught covid. This isn’t a secret. We’re 3.5 years in and you STILL don’t know what covid vaccines are for?