Democrats logic:
Deporting millions of illegals costs money
White House ballroom costs money
Stopping Islamic Republic of Iran from having nuclear weapons costs money
So all of these must stop!
But having 20 million illegals in a country doesn't cost money, doesn't make housing more expensive, and doesn't put pressure on healthcare and schools.
You can't say anything about those millions of illegals. Why? Those are Democrats’ scared vote banks!
When there is amnesty, there must be mass denaturalization.
When there is mass immigration, there must be mass deportations.
When there is Islamization, there must be de-Islamization.
That's how you take back your country, that’s how you save your culture.
@RubinReport@RonDeSantis@AGJamesUthmeier Most non-Muslims don't realize, usually until it’s too late, that ISLAM IS AN EXTREMELY OPPRESSIVE POLITICAL SYSTEM, not just another religion.
Almost all the third-world immigrants will never vote for Republicans or any nationalist party in a First World country. Why? Because third-world immigrants' ultimate priority is to vote for the party that will keep the Border Wide Open, so more of them can immigrate. Amnesty is a suicidal mistake; mass deportation is the solution.
@repdeliaramirez Remember guys, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was established after the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks. You know what these Dems want!
1. We need more people
2. To support more people, we need more Uber drivers
3. To get more Uber drivers, we need more people
Soon the place turns overcrowded, less affordable, crime rises, and quality of life falls.
Now the pro-immigration “liberal” politicians of that place can run on a “more affordable” agenda.
The destiny of Democracy depends on Demography.
Democracy is the game of Demography.
Sadly, America’s Demographics have changed dangerously against Americans.
A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life.
At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday."
He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy.
Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system.
He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting.
He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way."
The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.
3 out of 5 of them are Muslims, pushing the Islamic agenda. Still, they call them “socialist”, while no Islamic countries are socialist, they are just Islamic.
People in the West don't realize that Islam itself is a Political/Ruling system.
@SpeakerJohnson 3 out of 5 of them are Muslims, pushing Islamic agenda, still they call them “socialist” while no Islamic countries are socialist, they are just Islamic. People in the West don't realize that Islam itself is a Political/Ruling system.
@realMaalouf@mrddmia Majority and Minority are Democratic ways of thinking. Muslims don't need to become the Majority to take control of a country, or ruin that country, culture, or society.
Remember, Muslims managed to partition India while making up about 24% of the total population. The partition of India created two new Islamic states, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Today, Muslims make up about 97% of Pakistan’s population and 91% of Bangladesh’s. Although India gained independence from British rule without a direct war, the Partition demanded by Muslims cost an estimated 2 to 3 Million lives.
Today, Muslims are fighting for separate states in many other places, against either non-Muslims or other Muslim sects, including in India, China, Lebanon, Philippines, Nigeria, Myanmar, Syria, Iraq, Yemen. So, you know what’s coming next for the USA, UK, France, or Germany.