#IshanKishan is the PERFECT No.3 batter for India, why would you send #TilakVarma over him? Tilak is best suited as a finisher. He's not someone who you send in to continue a terrific momentum, his playing style infact might actually break it. This decision makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Hyderabad men are kicking a man and his baby for shopping in old city just because he is a Hindu and his wife is muslim
Hyderabad is a leftover Pakistan
A Muslim CM from a left-wing party openly says he doesn't believe in vote chori and also exposes election rigging during the Congress era.
Dimagi Naxals will now call Omar Abdullah an Andhbhakt too. 😂
HERE IS THE VOICE OF "FEARLESSNESS".
"I undertake and promise not to commit any breach of peace. Further it is also expressed that I have full faith in judiciary and all its instruments including the learned SEM Court. That we reiterate our undertaking and commitment towards peace, law and order, public tranquillity and further we specifically State that we will not make any calls for protest at Janta Manar till such a time that it is de-notified in accordance with Law. That we further reiterate that any protest undertaken would be done within the four corners of the Constitution."
Signed: Ranka and Das
Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka gave this undertaking to the court to get bail: "We will not make any calls for protest at Jantar Mantar till it's de-notified in accordance with law."
Before anyone denies it, the record is clear.
Wait, so Saurav Das’s side couldn’t provide details about his parentage in the surety documents, the court questioned it, took a five-minute break, and then they came back and withdrew the petition? 😭
Bro went to the Delhi High Court and somehow the biggest plot twist of the hearing turned out to be his own parentage details.
AND THEN THEY WITHDREW THE PETITION. You genuinely cannot make this stuff up 🤣🤣🤣
He took his own life.
A delivery boy’s final plea…
In Delhi’s Kalyanpuri, a young Flipkart Minutes delivery partner named Sameer Hussain recorded a video in which he said that a customer handed him a torn ₹10 note for a COD order. When he objected, he was insulted, threatened, and slapped.
He repeatedly said that he had complained earlier as well, but the police took no action. After his self-respect was shattered, he consumed poison. His family is at LBS Hospital appealing for an FIR and justice.
This is not just one incident.
This is a picture of a society where a hardworking person is considered “inferior.” Delivery boys, sanitation workers, auto drivers — these people run day and night for our convenience, yet they have to endure humiliation over a torn note or a small matter.
And when they go to the police for help, their voices are often not heard. The lack of timely action breaks an innocent person.
The question is —
Will the respect of a hardworking person be decided only by his job?
And will the police wake up only when someone records a video and consumes poison?
Treating delivery partners and ordinary labourers with respect is not charity; it is humanity. And taking timely action is the police’s responsibility.
For incidents like Sameer’s not to keep happening, both society and the system must be held accountable.
Request to @DelhiPolice : Please take action against the accused.
#RespectDeliveryPartners #JusticeForSameer #DelhiPolice
इस मुस्लिम ने बताया कि #हिमाचल_प्रदेश और #उत्तराखंड में #वन_विभाग के अधिकारियों से सभी की सेटिंग है।
उत्तराखंड हिमाचल प्रदेश के मूलनिवासी फसलों के कम उत्पादन पर अपने खेतों में लगे पेड़ नहीं काट सकते हैं।
लेकिन घुसपैठियों ने बताया कौन से कागज़ कौन सी परमिशन चाहिए सब बिकती है।
I watched Prahaar today, a movie based on the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks and the court proceedings involving terrorist Ajmal Kasab. Honestly, I am quite disappointed with the way certain important facts have been completely left out, while others have been inaccurately portrayed.
The film goes into considerable detail about the court proceedings, but somehow misses some of the most important aspects of the case.
First, the red thread and the fake ID card with a Hindu name.
The film completely leaves out this part of the story. In reality, Kasab told the magistrate about the red thread (kalawa) tied around his wrist and the use of a fake identity. The Supreme Court judgment also mentions that his fake ID card carried the name Samir Chaudhary.
These were not insignificant details. According to Kasab’s confession, the attackers were given Hindu identities and made to wear sacred threads as part of a deliberate plan.
The plan was to make the attack appear as a Hindu terror attack, yet the film completely leaves out this crucial aspect of the case.
How can you make a film that claims to cover the court proceedings in detail and completely leave out such a crucial part of the case?
Second, the portrayal of Kasab’s remorse.
The film seems to portray Kasab as someone who is deeply regretful, troubled by his actions, and experiencing remorse towards the end.
But the Supreme Court judgment explicitly states that Ajmal Kasab showed no remorse for his terrorist acts and had told the magistrate that he had absolutely no regret for what he had done.
If a filmmaker is making a film based on real events, why not present the facts as they are?
People who have followed the case and read about the actual proceedings will notice these discrepancies.
I genuinely went into this film expecting a more accurate and complete portrayal of the case. Instead, I came away disappointed.
When the truth is already documented in court records, there should be no hesitation in presenting it.
When you selectively erase facts and manufacture emotions, you are not telling a story, you are selling a narrative.
1/5 Sharjeel Imam has given an interview detailing his Islamist manifesto. Surprisingly, no storm has been kicked up over pronouncements that are so unapologetically anti-liberal, anti-secular, anti-democracy, anti-Constitution—in a word, anti-national.
2/5 He openly calls the Constitution fascist, labels secularism a trap, and denounces democracy as a contrivance to deny Muslims their political rights.
3/5 The piece is a litany of indictments against the liberal class. Imam rejects any difference between liberals and Hindutvadis. In his essentialist worldview, all Hindus are the same, unanimous in denying Muslims political power they claim as a divine right.
4/5 Inadvertently, Sharjeel has recognised something that liberals have been fighting shy of acknowledging: that Hindutva’s idea of India is anchored in the same “overarching nationalist framework”— that Muslims are Indians above all else.
5/5 For more, read this Opinion article by Ibn Khaldun Bharati, who looks at Islam from an Indian perspective:
Sharjeel Imam’s Islamist manifesto will be forgotten. The silence of liberals will not
https://t.co/UzbkRLx9tA
Uploading the full 40 minute Sharjeel speech, since many might not have seen it.
Please watch and understand the mindset.
Him and his ilk are Pakistanis living in India.
Many young muslims from JNU/AMU/JMI espouse the same ideology.
Watch.
This is just so painful
A delivery boy with @Flipkartminutes ended life over assault, humiliation and abuse by a customer who himself gave him a torn 10 rupees note and then started fighting with him
This young boy complained to @DelhiPolice but no action was taken
Tragic!
UN Human Rights
When protests in Europe
Headline: Dialogue
Statement after a month
No mention of detentions (Thousands detained)
Law enforcement: proportionate
When protests in India
Headline: Concern
Statement on same day
Concerns over detentions
Law enforcement: restraint