@LeGoatSunshine6@DirtysBurner@koestreicher34 He had back to back 17.5 sacks season and he was in a great pace last year before sitting the rest of the szn. He didn’t want to play for the sorry ass pussycat. Stop acting like 2 years ago is 20 years ago.
@samuelle01__@MisterPat23@GagnonFrancois Je te confirme qu’il y a plus de monde de Tampa qui vont voir les Orlando Magic (NBA) que le Lightning. Donc oui le hockey c’est leur 4ieme sports la-bas
@AnotherYB@BizNasty2point0 Why would I waist my time arguing with you . We have 2 different opinions, I’m not changing mine and you are not changing yours ahaha . I know none Tampa fan would agree with me cuz they are literally the same
@AnotherYB@BizNasty2point0 Yes they both have the same first point of contact and both have their fleet leaving the ice after the contact . The only difference one was in the middle of ice and the other near the bench . Learn the game pussy
@XLonewolfx21@FriedgeHNIC You are literally proving the point that it was non conclusive during the review . If it was conclusive you wouldn’t need to make the skate disappear with Ai
@SteveGalla146@ProducerDrew_ So by your logic this one should have been a good goal ? https://t.co/hCsQtsd6xm . You can clearly see by the path of the puck that it was in under mcdoonag pants before coming back up on the goal line .
@BarstoolChief By the NHL rulebook, it has to be 💯 certain from the video. If you need AI edits and extra calculations to prove it, then it’s not conclusive from the video alone.
@DobberHockey By the NHL rulebook, it has to be 💯 certain from the video. If you need AI edits and extra calculations to prove it, then it’s not conclusive from the video alone.